Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2790-9948
Breast Neurotization: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Directions
Authors
Abstract
The growing population of breast cancer survivors has increased the demand for breast reconstruction that restores not only shape but also sensory function. Neurotization techniques aiming to reestablish breast and nipple sensation have demonstrated promising outcomes, yet optimal approaches remain undefined. A scoping review of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted, focusing on studies of breast neurotization across autologous and implant-based reconstructions. Quantitative tools enable objective assessment of breast sensation across reconstruction types. Neurotization of autologous flaps improves recovery of protective and erogenous sensation and enhances physical well-being without adding significant surgical risk. Neurotization on implant-based breast reconstruction with nerve graft also showed promising sensory outcomes. Autografts support consistent nerve regeneration but are technically demanding; allografts simplify surgery and reduce morbidity but remain costly and underexplored. While preclinical data favor superficial neurotization, both superficial and deep approaches yield good clinical outcomes. Neurotization significantly improves postoperative sensation and patient-reported outcomes. Standardized prospective studies are needed to optimize technique selection and validate long-term benefits.
Keywords
breast neurotization - nerve coaptation - intercostal nerve - axogen - Tommy transfer - breast reconstruction - autograft - allograftPublication History
Article published online:
10 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (04) 1083-1090
- 2 Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (01) 120-127
- 3 Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L, Geigant E, Solders G. Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (06) 443-449
- 4 Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 96 (01) 47-51
- 5 Faulkner HR, Colwell AS, Liao EC, Winograd JM, Austen Jr WG. Thermal injury to reconstructed breasts from commonly used warming devices: a risk for reconstructive failure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1033
- 6 Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J. et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 818-829
- 7 Terzis J, Faibisoff B, Williams B. The nerve gap: suture under tension vs. graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56 (02) 166-170
- 8 Blondeel PN, Demuynck M, Mete D. et al. Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless?. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (01) 37-44
- 9 Vartanian ED, Lo AY, Hershenhouse KS, Jacob L, Patel KM. The role of neurotization in autologous breast reconstruction: can reconstruction restore breast sensation?. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123 (05) 1215-1231
- 10 Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, Spiegel AJ. et al. Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (09) 1229-1241
- 11 Harish V, Haffner ZK, Bekeny JC, Sayyed AA, Song DH, Fan KL. Preserving nipple sensitivity after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast J 2022; 2022: 9654741
- 12 Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ. et al. Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 167 (03) 687-695
- 13 Shyu S, Chang TN, Lu JC. et al. Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (05) 3235-3247
- 14 Spiegel AJ, Salazar-Reyes H, Izaddoost S, Khan FN. A novel method for neurotization of deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 29e-30e
- 15 Shiah E, Laikhter E, Comer CD. et al. Neurotization in innervated breast reconstruction: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (09) 2890-2913
- 16 Xia TY, Scomacao I, Djohan R, Moreira A, Gurunian R, Schwarz GS. Neurotization does not prolong operative time in free flap breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (05) 2159-2163
- 17 Momeni A, Meyer S, Shefren K, Januszyk M. Flap neurotization in breast reconstruction with nerve allografts: 1-year clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (01) e3328
- 18 Boyd CJ, Hemal K, Sorenson TJ. et al. Assessing perioperative complications and cost of nipple-areolar complex neurotization in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a matched-paired comparison. Ann Plast Surg 2025; 94 (4S, suppl 2): S118-S120
- 19 Lee YH, Huang JJ, Lu JC, Cheong DC, Chen CF, Chang TN. Complications and donor site morbidity in harvesting the intercostal main nerve as a graft for breast neurotization in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025
- 20 Ducic I, Yoon J, Momeni A, Ahcan U. Anatomical considerations to optimize sensory recovery in breast neurotization with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (11) e1985
- 21 Mohan AT, Suchyta M, Vyas KS, Lachman N, Mardini S, Saint-Cyr M. A cadaveric anatomical and histological study of recipient intercostal nerve selection for sensory reinnervation in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 136-142
- 22 Glassman GE, Al-Kassis S, Assi PE. et al. Anatomic comparison of recipient nerves for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap neurotization: a randomized control trial. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (06) 641-646
- 23 Slezak S, McGibbon B, Dellon AL. The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 28 (03) 210-217
- 24 Doncatto L, Hochberg J, Caleffi M. Breast reconstruction with sensitive TRAM flap reinnervation. Breast J 1997; 3 (06) 345-349
- 25 Isenberg JS. Sense and sensibility: breast reconstruction with innervated TRAM flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18 (01) 23-28
- 26 Yano K, Matsuo Y, Hosokawa K. Breast reconstruction by means of innervated rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1452-1460
- 27 Yano K, Hosokawa K, Takagi S, Nakai K, Kubo T. Breast reconstruction using the sensate latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 1897-1902 , discussion 1903
- 28 Blondeel PN. The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52 (03) 185-193
- 29 Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, Lataster A, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated lateral thigh perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (02) 281-292
- 30 Puonti HK, Jääskeläinen SK, Hallikainen HK, Partanen TA. Improved sensory recovery with a novel dual neurorrhaphy technique for breast reconstruction with free muscle sparing TRAM flap technique. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 21-28
- 31 Temple CL, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, MacDermid J, Gan BS, Ross DC. Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2119-2127 , discussion 2128–2130
- 32 Yap LH, Whiten SC, Forster A, Stevenson HJ. Sensory recovery in the sensate free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (05) 1280-1288
- 33 Magarakis M, Venkat R, Dellon AL. et al. Pilot study of breast sensation after breast reconstruction: evaluating the effects of radiation therapy and perforator flap neurotization on sensory recovery. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (06) 421-431
- 34 Lu Wang M, Qin N, Chadab TM. et al. A pilot study comparing sensation in buried versus nonburied deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90 (6S, suppl 5): S574-S577
- 35 Bubberman JM, Brandts L, van Kuijk SMJ, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Preliminary results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Breast 2024; 74: 103691
- 36 Djohan R, Scomacao I, Duraes EFR, Knackstedt R, Mangan R, Schwarz G. Sensory restoration in abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction using nerve allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (01) 25-33
- 37 Huang H, Wang ML, Ellison A, Otterburn DM. Comparing autologous to device-based breast reconstruction: a pilot study of return in breast sensation. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (3, suppl 3): S184-S189
- 38 Beugels J, Bijkerk E, Lataster A, Heuts EM, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Nerve coaptation improves the sensory recovery of the breast in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (02) 273-284
- 39 Bijkerk E, van Kuijk SMJ, Lataster A, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 181 (03) 599-610
- 40 Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, van Kuijk SMJ. et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 178e-188e
- 41 Spiegel AJ, Menn ZK, Eldor L, Kaufman Y, Dellon AL. Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (08) e72
- 42 van Rooij JAF, Bijkerk E, van der Hulst RRJW, Tuinder SMH. The influence of a previous implant-based breast reconstruction on postoperative sensation of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Breast Cancer 2024; 31 (03) 456-466
- 43 van Rooij JAF, Bijkerk E, van der Hulst RRJW, van Kuijk SMJ, Tuinder SMH. Replacing an implant-based with a DIEP flap breast reconstruction: breast sensation and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (02) 293-304
- 44 Wang LM, Qin N, Chen Y. et al. A comparative analysis of sensory return in delayed-immediate versus immediate neurotized deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2023;
- 45 Qin N, Black GG, Chen Y, Wang ML, Huang H, Otterburn DM. Impact of comorbidities on sensory return after breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92 (4S, suppl 2): S185-S190
- 46 Lapiņš J, Polita BSD, Kalniņa L. et al. Novel nipple reinnervation technique using N. suralis graft. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60 (09) 1533
- 47 Peled AW, von Eyben R, Peled ZM. Sensory outcomes after neurotization in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (12) e5437
- 48 Djohan R, Scomacao I, Knackstedt R, Cakmakoglu C, Grobmyer SR. Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (02) 250-254
- 49 Juan Z, Liang YP, Shen JL. et al. Efficacy and safety of intercostal nerve anastomosis in immediate subpectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical study. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1261936
- 50 Chang TN, Lu JC, Sung CW. et al. Elongation of intercostal nerve cutaneous branches for breast and nipple neurotization during breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: case-control study. Br J Surg 2024; 111 (02) znae005
- 51 Black GG, Chen Y, Qin N, Wang ML, Huang H, Otterburn DM. An evolving landscape: return of breast sensation after mastectomy varies by anatomic region and reconstructive method. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92 (4S, suppl 2): S91-S95
- 52 Zhang A, Salingaros S, Arbuiso S. et al. Comparing primary coaptation and allograft in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: long-term sensory and BREAST-Q outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2025; 94 (4S, suppl 2): S291-S296
- 53 Puonti HK, Broth TA, Soinila SO, Hallikainen HK, Jääskeläinen SK. How to assess sensory recovery after breast reconstruction surgery?. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17 (06) 471-485
- 54 Lu LI, Chuang DC. Sensory reinnervation of a musculocutaneous flap: an experimental rabbit study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (03) 291-298
- 55 Guido G, Peled ZM, Peled AW. Degree and timing of sensory return following nipple-areolar complex neurotization during nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2025; 94 (5S, suppl 3): S452-S456
