Endoscopy 2009; 41(3): 187-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1119590
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

High prevalence of esophageal involvement in lichen planus: a study using magnification chromoendoscopy

R.  Quispel1 , O.  S.  van Boxel1 , M.  E.  Schipper2 , V.  Sigurdsson3 , M.  R.  Canninga-van Dijk2 , A.  Kerckhoffs1 , A.  J.  P.  M.  Smout1 , M.  Samsom1 , M.  P.  Schwartz1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

submitted31 October 2007

accepted after revision8 December 2008

Publication Date:
11 March 2009 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: The first cases of squamous cell carcinoma in esophageal lichen planus were recently described. We performed a study to establish the prevalence of endoscopic and histopathologic abnormalities consistent with lichen planus and (pre-) malignancy in a cohort of patients with lichen planus.

Patients and methods: A total of 24 patients with lichen planus were prospectively studied using high-magnification chromoendoscopy. Focal esophageal abnormalities were mapped, classified, and biopsied. Biopsies were also taken from normal-appearing esophageal mucosa at three levels (proximal, middle, and distal). The presence of a lymphohistiocytic interface inflammatory infiltrate and Civatte bodies (i. e. apoptotic basal keratinocytes) at histopathologic examination was considered diagnostic for esophageal lichen planus. Symptoms were assessed using validated questionnaires.

Results: A total of 38 focal abnormalities were biopsied. These consisted of: layers of mucosa peeling off, hyperemic lesions, papular lesions, submucosal plaques/papules, a flat polypoid lesion, and segments of cylindrical epithelium. No endoscopic signs of dysplasia were present. Esophagitis consistent with gastroesophageal reflux disease was noted in 12 / 24 patients. Histopathology showed chronic inflammation of the esophageal mucosa in the majority (18 / 24) of patients. In 50 % (12 / 24), the diagnosis of esophageal lichen planus was made. Dysplasia was not present. There were no differences in symptoms between patients with and without esophageal lichen planus.

Conclusions: At screening endoscopy a high prevalence (50 %) of esophageal lichen planus was found in patients with orocutaneous lichen planus. No dysplasia was found.

References

R. QuispelMD (Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis) 

Department of Gastroenterology

PO Box 5011
2600 GA Delft
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-15-2604080

Email: rquispel@rdgg.nl; rutgerq@hotmail.com