Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2009; 117(5): 230-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1128125
Article

© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Longitudinal Change in HbA1c in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Short-acting, Biphasic and Basal Insulin

W. Rathmann 1 , K. Strassburger 1 , K. Kostev 2 , D. Schröder-Bernhardi 2 , G. Giani 1 , M. Happich 3
  • 1Institute of Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 2IMS HEALTH, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 3Eli Lilly Germany, Bad Homburg, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received 27.06.2008 first decision 30.12.2008

accepted 30.12.2008

Publication Date:
18 February 2009 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the annual change in HbA1c values among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care practices comparing different insulin regimens.

Research Design and Methods: Longitudinal data from 666 nationwide general and internal medicine practices in Germany (Disease Analyser, IMS HEALTH) from 7/2004 to 6/2006 were analysed, including 348 patients (mean age±SD: 61±11 years) with continuous short-acting (regular insulin or analogues), 1 906 with biphasic (72±9 years), 439 with basal-bolus (68±10 years), and 1 719 with basal insulin therapy (65±10 years). The mean of the individual relative changes in HbA1c (level in 2006 divided by level in 2005) were compared between insulin groups, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, diabetes duration, oral antidiabetics, comorbidity, health insurance, visits, hospitalisations, and practice type using general linear models.

Results: There was only a small difference in baseline HbA1c values (range 7.3–7.5%) between the four insulin groups (p=0.008). Substantial group differences were observed for age, diabetes duration, and additional prescriptions of oral antidiabetics (p<0.0001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the relative annual increase in HbA1c was highest for biphasic insulin (1.021; 95%CI 1.016–1.025), followed by basal-bolus therapy (1.017; 1.012–1.022), and basal insulin (monotherapy) (1.012; 1.002–1.021). No significant change in HbA1c was found for short-acting insulin (1.006; 0.996–1.016).

Conclusions: Although many options for insulin therapy are now available, a progression of glycemia still occurs in the majority of insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients in primary care.

References

Correspondence

Dr. W. RathmannMD, MSPH (USA) 

Institute of Biometrics and Epidemiology

German Diabetes Center

Auf’m Hennekamp 65

40225 Düsseldorf

Phone: +49/211/33 82 663

Fax: +49/211/33 82 677

Email: rathmann@ddz.uni-duesseldorf.de