Semin Plast Surg 2009; 23(3): 163-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224794
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Variations of Structural Components: Specific Intercultural Differences in Facial Morphology, Skin Type, and Structures

Aisha McKnight1 , Adeyiza O. Momoh1 , Jamal M. Bullocks1
  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 July 2009 (online)

ABSTRACT

Analysis of the differences in facial morphology and skin structure and tone among ethnic groups within the realm of plastic surgery is relevant due to the increasing number of ethnic individuals seeking cosmetic surgery. Previous classifications of ideal facial morphologic characteristics have been revised and challenged over the years to accurately reflect the differences in facial structure that are aesthetically pleasing to individuals of differing ethnic groups. The traditional neoclassic canons reflected the European Caucasian facial morphology and cannot be used to classify facial characteristics in ethnic groups due to drastic differences in measurement and proportion. In addition, differences in biophysiologic properties of ethnic skin types influence the progression of aging and the ability of skin to withstand environmental insults. Thickness of the stratum corneum, water content, and melanin composition are important factors that were analyzed in varying ethnic groups. Although it appears that Caucasian Americans are subject to earlier onset of skin wrinkling and sagging than are African Americans due to thinner stratum corneum layers and decreased water content, more research needs to be conducted to be inclusive of other ethnic groups. These data will enable plastic surgeons to treat these groups more effectively while preserving their unique characteristics.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Muzaffar A R, Flood J. Craniofacial Anomalies I: Cephalometrics & Orthognathnic Surgery. Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery Dallas, TX; Vol. 9, ch 24:2
  • 2 Farkas L G, Hreczko T A, Kolar J C, Munro I R. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  75 328-338
  • 3 Farkas L G, Kolar J C. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women's faces.  Clin Plast Surg. 1987;  14 599-616
  • 4 Farkas L G, Katic M J, Forrest C R. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females.  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  59 692-698
  • 5 Farkas L G, Katic M J, Forrest C R et al.. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.  J Craniofac Surg. 2005;  16 615-646
  • 6 Porter J P, Olson K L. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;  3 191-197
  • 7 Porter J P. The average African American male face: an anthropometric analysis.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;  6 78-81
  • 8 Le T T, Farkas L G, Ngim R C, Levin L S, Forrest C R. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;  26 64-69
  • 9 Odunze M, Reid R R, Yu M, Few J W. Periorbital rejuvenation and the African American patient: a survey approach.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  118 1011-1018
  • 10 Wesley N O, Maibach H I. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objective data.  Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;  4 843-860
  • 11 Diridollou S, de Rigal J, Querleux B, Leroy F, Holloway Barbosa V. Comparative study of the hydration of the stratum corneum between four ethnic groups: influence of age.  Int J Dermatol. 2007;  (46 Suppl 1) 11-14
  • 12 Rawlings A V. Ethnic skin types: are there differences in skin structure and function?.  Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;  28 79-93

Aisha McKnightM.D. 

Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

6701 Fannin, CC610.00, Houston, TX 77030

Email: ajmcknig@bcm.edu

    >