Cost Analysis of 109 Microsurgical Reconstructions and Flap Monitoring with Microdialysis

ABSTRACT

Few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of microsurgery, and little is known about the cost-effectiveness of flap monitoring. We studied the costs related to microsurgery during 2004 to 2006 in Kuopio University Hospital. A total of 99 patients were reconstructed with 109 flaps. Primary success was achieved in 64% of cases. Reoperation for anastomosis was conducted in 25% and for other surgical complications in 27%. The intended result was achieved in 94% of cases. The mean total cost of hospital care was 20,000 € in head and neck cancer surgery, 15,500 € in defects of the lower extremities, and 9200 € in breast reconstruction. The costs were greatly influenced by surgical complications (i.e., if the primary reconstruction failed, then the secondary microvascular flap almost doubled the expense involved; mean expenses per case 27,900 €). Microdialysis was used in flap monitoring with an additional cost of 535 € per patient. We found that microdialysis provided an early diagnosis of perfusion failure and helped to save the flap. It was estimated that if one or two flaps per year are saved due to more effective monitoring, then the extra costs of using microdialysis are covered.

Microsurgery - monitoring - microdialysis - cost analysis

REFERENCES

• 1 Jones N F. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free tissue transfers.  Clin Plast Surg. 1992;  19 783-797
• 2 Kamolz L P, Giovanoli P, Haslik W, Koller R, Frey M. Continuous free-flap monitoring with tissue-oxygen measurements: three-year experience.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;  18 487-491 discussion 492-493
• 3 Disa J J, Cordeiro P G, Hidalgo D A. Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 97-101
• 4 Setälä L, Papp A, Romppanen E L, Mustonen P, Berg L, Härmä M. Microdialysis detects postoperative perfusion failure in microvascular flaps.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006;  22 87-96
• 5 Thoma A, Strumas N, Rockwell G, McKnight L. The use of cost-effectiveness analysis in plastic surgery clinical research.  Clin Plast Surg. 2008;  35 285-296
• 6 Miller M J, Swartz W M, Miller R H, Harvey J M. Cost analysis of microsurgical reconstruction in the head and neck.  J Surg Oncol. 1991;  46 230-234
• 7 de Bree R, Reith R, Quak J J, Uyl-de Groot C A, van Agthoven M, Leemans C R. Free radial forearm flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects: a cost analysis.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2007;  32 275-282
• 8 Heinz T R, Cowper P A, Levin L S. Microsurgery costs and outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 89-96
• 9 Petruzzelli G J, Brockenbrough J M, Vandevender D, Creech S D. The influence of reconstructive modality on cost of care in head and neck oncologic surgery.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;  128 1377-1380
• 10 Jones N F, Jarrahy R, Song J I, Kaufman M R, Markowitz B. Postoperative medical complications—not microsurgical complications—negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  119 2053-2060
• 11 Preminger B A, Pusic A L, McCarthy C M, Verma N, Worku A, Cordeiro P G. How should quality-of-life data be incorporated into a cost analysis of breast reconstruction? A consideration of implant versus free TRAM flap procedures.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121 1075-1082
• 12 Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Veltri K. Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction.  Microsurgery. 2003;  23 287-295
• 13 Khouri R K. Avoiding free flap failure.  Clin Plast Surg. 1992;  19 773-781
• 14 Lin C S, Lee H C, Lin C T, Lin H C. The association between surgeon case volume and hospitalization costs in free flap oral cancer reconstruction operations.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 133-139