Endoscopic sutured closure of a gastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access gastrotomy compared with open surgical closure in a porcine model. A randomized, multicenter controlled trial

Background and study aims: In natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures it is essential to be able to perform secure closure of the access perforation. The aim of this study was to compare endoscopically sutured closure of a gastric access gastrotomy using the tissue apposition system (TAS), with closure via laparotomy in a randomized multicenter study.

Methods: A total of 32 pigs (18 – 42 kg) were used in this study. The gastric NOTES access was created using a needle knife and a 20-mm balloon. Following transgastric pelvic peritoneoscopy, the endoscope was withdrawn into the stomach. The animals were then randomized to endoscopic closure or laparotomy with surgical closure. Procedure time, recovery time, and weight gain were measured. At necropsy, adhesions, abscesses or peritonitis were recorded.

Results: Of the 32 pigs, 29 survived 14 days without complications. All endoscopic and all open surgical closures were secure at postmortem. On average two suture pairs were used for endoscopic closure. Surgical closure was quicker (12.5 vs. 20.1 minutes). Recovery time and postoperative weight gain were similar for both groups. Two pigs in the endoscopic group died: one of gastric dilatation, without leakage from the gastrotomy; another was euthanized due to rectal prolapse. In the laparotomy group one pig was euthanized after 7 days due to abdominal wound dehiscence. At necropsy there were significantly more intra-abdominal adhesions in the laparotomized group.

Conclusion: This randomized controlled study of endoscopic and surgical closure of a gastrotomy made for transperitoneal access for NOTES procedures suggests that both techniques are comparable in technical closure rates, postoperative recovery, and prevention of peritonitis. There were fewer adhesions in the endoscopic group.

References

• 1 Rao G V, Reddy D N, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008;  18 361-370
• 2 Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse C A. et al . Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 122-129
• 3 Ikeda K, Mosse C A, Park P O. et al . Endoscopic full-thickness resection: circumferential cutting method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 82-89
• 4 Sclabas G M, Swain P, Swanstrom L L. Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES).  Surg Innov. 2006;  13 23-30
• 5 Perretta S, Sereno S, Forgione A. et al . A new method to close the gastrotomy by using a cardiac septal occluder: long-term survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 809-813
• 6 Swain P. The ShapeLock system adapted to intragastric and transgastric surgery.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 466-470
• 7 Chiu P W, Lau J Y, Ng E K. et al . Closure of a gastrotomy after transgastric tubal ligation by using the Eagle Claw VII: a survival experiment in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 554-559
• 8 Schurr M O, Arezzo A, Ho C N. et al . The OTSC clip for endoscopic organ closure in NOTES: device and technique.  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;  17 262-266
• 9 McGee M F, Marks J M, Onders R P. et al . Complete endoscopic closure of gastrotomy after natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery using the NDO plicator.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 214-220
• 10 Cios T J, Reavis K M, Renton D R. et al . Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 961-966
• 11 Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E. et al . Endoscopic full-thickness closure of large gastric perforations by use of tissue anchors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 134-139
• 12 von Delius S, Gillen S, Doundoulakis E. et al . Comparison of transgastric access techniques for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 940-947
• 13 Arezzo A, Kratt T, Schurr M O, Morino M. Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric cholecystectomy and secure endoscopic closure of the transgastric defect in a survival porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 767-772
• 14 Voermans R P, Worm A M, van Berge Henegouwen M I. et al . In vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 595-601
• 15 Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P O. Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 307-312
• 16 Park P O, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K. et al . Endoscopic pyloroplasty with full-thickness transgastric and transduodenal myotomy with sutured closure.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 116-120
• 17 Bergstrom M, Swain P, Park P O. Early clinical experience with a new flexible endoscopic suturing method for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and intraluminal endosurgery (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 528-533
• 18 Raju G S, Fritscher-Ravens A, Rothstein R I. et al . Endoscopic closure of colon perforation compared to surgery in a porcine model: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 324-332
• 19 Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al . Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 114-117
• 20 Hazey J W, Narula V K, Renton D B. et al . Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 16-20
• 21 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
• 22 Lima E, Rolanda C, Pego J M. et al . Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: a novel 5 mm port for intra-abdominal scarless surgery.  J Urol. 2006;  176 802-805
• 23 Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S. et al . Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.  Arch Surg. 2007;  142 823-826
• 24 Crofts T J, Park K G, Steele R J. et al . A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  320 970-973
• 25 Jagannath S B, Kantsevoy S V, Vaughn C A. et al . Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 449-453
• 26 Holmdahl L. Making and covering of surgical footprints.  Lancet. 1999;  353 1456-1457
• 27 Aiello S. The Merck Veterinary Manual 2006 Merck Inc., Merial. 9th edn. Pennsylvania: John Wiley and Sons. On-line at: http://www.merckveterinarymanual.com .