Der Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)

Zusammenfassung

In Nordamerika gilt die Verwendung aktuarischer Instrumente zur Schätzung des Rückfallrisikos bei Straftätern als „state of the art”. Eines dieser Instrumente ist der „Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide” (SORAG), der spezifisch für die Anwendung bei Sexualstraftätern entwickelt worden ist. Vorliegende Arbeit fasst die aktuelle Literatur zur Validität des Instrumentes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Validität im deutschen Sprachraum zusammen. Resümierend kann gesagt werden, dass der SORAG eine gute Trennschärfe aufweist. Einschränkend ist darauf hinzuweisen, dass diese nicht bei allen Gruppen von Sexualstraftätern gleich gut ist. Insbesondere in der Subpopulation der Straftäter, die sexuelle Handlungen an Kindern verübt haben, ist die Trennschärfe des SORAG als sehr gut einzuschätzen. Im Rahmen vorliegender Arbeit wird ferner eine von den Autoren des SORAG autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung des SORAG vorgelegt.

Abstract

In North America, the use of actuarial instruments is considered to be state of the art in the assessment of offender recidivism risk. One of these instruments is the ”Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide” (SORAG), which was developed specifically for the use in sex offender risk assessment. The present review investigates the current state of knowledge regarding the instrument’s validity specifically for its use in German-speaking countries. Overall the results speak for the instrument’s good discriminatory power. However, this is not true to the same degree for all types of sex offender populations. The discriminatory power is especially good in the subpopulation of child molesters. Part of the present review is a German translation of the instrument authorised by the developers of the SORAG.

SORAG - deutsche Übersetzung - Rückfallrisiko - Validität

SORAG - German translation - recidivism risk - validity

Literatur

• 1 Seto M C. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders.  Psychological Assessment. 2005;  17 156-167
• 2 Grove W M, Zald D H, Lebow B S et al. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis.  Psychological Assessment. 2000;  12 19-30
• 3 Hilton N Z, Simmons J L. The Influence of Actuarial Risk Assessment in Clinical Judgments and Tribunal Decisions about Mentally Disordered Offenders in Maximum Security.  Law and Human Behavior. 2001;  25 393-408
• 4 Quinsey V L, Harris G T, Rice M E. et al .Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2. Aufl. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006
• 5 Swets J A, Dawes R M, Monahan J. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2000;  1 1-26
• 6 Hanson R K, Morton-Bourgon K E. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.  Psychological Assessment. 2009;  21 1-21
• 7 Andrews D A, Bonta J. Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 3. Aufl. Cincinnati: Anderson; 2003
• 8 Boetticher A, Kröber H L, Müller-Isberner R et al. Mindestanforderungen für Prognosegutachten.  Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie. 2007;  1 90-100
• 9 Harris G T, Rice M E, Quinsey V L. Violent Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Statistical Prediction Instrument.  Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1993;  20 315-335
• 10 Epperson D L, Kaul J D, Huot S. et al .Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) Technical Paper: Development, Validation, and Recommended Risk Level Cut Scores. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections; 2003
• 11 Thornton D, Mann R, Webster S et al. Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;  989 225-235
• 12 Hanson R K, Thornton D. Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada; 1999
• 13 U. S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health; 2009 http://www.pubmed.com
• 14 Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer D P et al. Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment: A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes.  International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2009;  DOI: 0306624X08328755
• 15 Kingston D A, Yates P M, Firestone P et al. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2008;  20 466-484
• 16 Ducro C, Pham T. Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian Sex Offenders Committed to a Forensic Facility.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;  18 15-26
• 17 Harris G T, Rice M E. Actuarial Assessment of Risk among Sex Offenders.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;  989 198-210
• 18 Nunes K L, Firestone P, Bradford J M et al. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2002;  14 253-269
• 19 Rice M E, Harris G T. Men Who Molest Their Sexually Immature Daughters: Is a Special Explanation Required?.  Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2002;  111 329-339
• 20 Looman J. Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Instruments for Sexual Offenders.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;  18 193-206
• 21 Bartosh D L, Garby T, Lewis D et al. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.  International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2003;  47 422-438
• 22 Harris G T, Rice M E, Quinsey V L et al. A Multisite Comparison of Actuarial Risk Instruments for Sex Offenders.  Psychological Assessment. 2003;  15 413-425
• 23 Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene Research Department .Penetanguishene. ON, Canada; 2007
• 24 Eher R, Rettenberger M, Schilling F et al. Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study.  Sexual Offender Treatment. 2008;  3 1-14
• 25 Langton C M, Barbaree H E, Seto M C et al. Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders: Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of the Static-2002 and Five Other Instruments.  Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007;  34 37-59
• 26 Barbaree H E, Seto M C, Langton C M et al. Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Six Risk Assessment Instruments for Adult Sex Offenders.  Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2001;  28 490-521
• 27 Rossegger A, Vetter S, Danielsson C et al. Validation and Calibration of the VRAG in a Swiss offender population.  submitted
• 28 Urbaniok F, Rinne T, Held L et al. Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren.  Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie. 2008;  76 470-477
• 29 Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis.  Pattern Recognition Letters. 2006;  27 861-874
• 30 Hosmer D W, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000
• 31 Hanson R K, Morton-Bourgon K E. Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2004
• 32 Rice M E, Harris G T. Cross-Validation and Extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for Child Molesters and Rapists.  Law and Human Behavior. 1997;  21 231-241
• 33 Hanson R K, Bussiere M T. Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;  66 348-362
• 34 Urbaniok F, Endrass J, Rossegger A et al. The prediction of criminal recidivism: the implication of sampling in prognostic models.  European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2007;  257 129-134
• 35 Rossegger A, Urbaniok F, Danielsson C et al. Der Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) – Ein Instrument zur Kriminalprognose bei Gewaltstraftätern: Übersichtsarbeit und autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung.  Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie. 2009;  77 577-584
• 36 Rice M E, Harris G T, Quinsey V L. A Follow-Up of Rapists Assessed in a Maximum-Security Psychiatric Facility.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1990;  5 435-448
• 37 Rice M E, Quinsey V L, Harris G T. Sexual Recidivism Among Child Molesters Released From a Maximum Security Psychiatric Institution.  Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 1991;  59 381-386
• 38 Quinsey V L, Rice M E, Harris G T. Actuarial Prediction of Sexual Recidivism.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1995;  10 85-105
• 39 Hare R D. Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. 2. Aufl. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems; 2003
• 40 Marshall W L. Clinical and research limitations in the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders.  Sexual Offender Treatment. 2006;  1 1-19
• 41 Venzlaff U, Foerster K. Psychiatrische Begutachtung. Ein praktisches Handbuch für Ärzte und Juristen. 5 Aufl. München: Elsevier; Urban & Fischer; 2009
• 42 Seto M C, Harris G T, Rice M E et al. The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims.  Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2004;  33 455-466
• 43 Seto M C, Lalumiere M L. A Brief Screening Scale to Identify Pedophilic Interests Among Child Molesters.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2001;  13 15-25
• 44 Brown L K. Assessing risk for elopement and breaches of conditional release in insanity acquitees.  Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2004;  64(8-B) 3739
• 45 Quinsey V L, Coleman G, Jones B et al. Proximal antecedents of eloping and reoffending among supervised mentally disordered offenders.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1997;  12 794-813
• 46 Hare R D. Scoring guidelines for the Hare PCL: SV. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1998
• 47 Forth A E, Kosson D S, Hare R D. Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth version. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 2003
• 48 Rettenberger M, Eher R. Predicting Reoffence in Sexual Offender Subtypes: A Prospective Validation Study of the German Version of the Sexual Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).  Sexual Offender Treatment. 2007;  2 1-12
• 49 Rettenberger M, Eher R. Aktuarische Kriminalprognosemethoden und Sexualdelinquenz: die deutsche Version des SORAG.  Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsform. 2007;  90 484-497