Semin Hear 2010; 31(1): 003-014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246320
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Use of the Bone-Anchored Cochlear Stimulator (Baha) and Satisfaction among Long-Term Users

Soha N. Ghossaini1 , 2 , Jaclyn B. Spitzer2 , 3 , 4 , Julia Borik3
  • 1Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
  • 2Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
  • 3Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
  • 4Montclair State University, Clifton, New Jersey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 April 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

The bone-anchored cochlear stimulator (Baha system) has been successfully used in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, more commonly known as single-sided deafness (SSD). Review of the literature revealed improvement in measured Baha-aided thresholds when compared to unaided responses. Only a few patient satisfaction studies in the literature reflect long-term follow-up findings. This article reviews the efficacy of Baha in a variety of patient diagnoses and reports on preliminary results of long-term patient satisfaction with Baha in 11 patients. A questionnaire was developed for this study that examines several dimensions of Baha use and practicality. The participants used the device for more than 1 year and responded to the questionnaire in writing or by telephone survey. The 30-item questionnaire probed several areas of interest: hearing performance; listening in groups; listening to music; localization; listening in large venues; and the pragmatic use of the device, such as requiring assistance to insert or remove the device, Baha satisfaction, sequelae to surgery, and change in participation limitation. For questions 1 to 30, the participant was asked to respond to the questions on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly) or to indicate “not applicable.” Nine additional questions explored whether the participants had other significant vision or medical conditions that might have an influence on the ability to adjust to Baha use.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Wazen J J, Spitzer J B, Ghossaini S N et al.. Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129(3) 248-254
  • 2 Tjellström A, Håkansson B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;  28(1) 53-72
  • 3 Browning G G, Gatehouse S. Estimation of the benefit of bone-anchored hearing aids.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;  103(11) 872-878
  • 4 Wazen J J, Caruso M, Tjellstrom A. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.  Am J Otol. 1998;  19(6) 737-741
  • 5 Lustig L R, Arts H A, Brackmann D E et al.. Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;  22(3) 328-334
  • 6 Dumper J, Hodgetts B, Liu R, Brandner N. Indications for bone-anchored hearing AIDS: a functional outcomes study.  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;  38(1) 96-105
  • 7 Cremers C W, Snik F M, Beynon A J. Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid.  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992;  17(3) 275-279
  • 8 Flynn M C, Sadeghi A, Halvarsson G. Baha solutions for patients with severe mixed hearing loss.  Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;  10(Suppl 1) 43-47
  • 9 Silman S, Silverman C A, Emmer M B, Gelfand S A. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;  30(3) 326-332
  • 10 Wazen J J, Spitzer J, Ghossaini S N, Kacker A, Zschommler A. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.  Laryngoscope. 2001;  111(6) 955-958
  • 11 Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. The bone-anchored hearing aid in patients with a unilateral air-bone gap.  Otol Neurotol. 2002;  23(1) 61-66
  • 12 Hol M K, Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?.  Audiol Neurootol. 2005;  10(3) 159-168
  • 13 Kunst S J, Leijendeckers J M, Mylanus E A, Hol M K, Snik A F, Cremers C W. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(1) 2-7
  • 14 van der Pouw K T, Snik A F, Cremers C W. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia.  Laryngoscope. 1998;  108(4 Pt 1) 548-553
  • 15 Priwin C, Stenfelt S, Granström G, Tjellström A, Håkansson B. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114(1) 77-84
  • 16 Priwin C, Jönsson R, Hultcrantz M, Granström G. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;  71(1) 135-145
  • 17 Dutt S N, McDermott A L, Burrell S P, Cooper H R, Reid A P, Proops D W. Speech intelligibility with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience.  J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 2002;  (28) 47-51
  • 18 Bosman A J, Snik A F, van der Pouw C T, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.  Audiology. 2001;  40(3) 158-167
  • 19 Bosman A J, Hol M K, Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness.  Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;  123(2) 258-260
  • 20 Hol M K, Bosman A J, Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.  Audiol Neurootol. 2004;  9(5) 274-281
  • 21 Hol M K, Bosman A J, Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;  26(5) 999-1006
  • 22 Lin L M, Bowditch S, Anderson M J, May B, Cox K M, Niparko J K. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27(2) 172-182
  • 23 Newman C W, Sandridge S A, Wodzisz L M. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(8) 1123-1131
  • 24 Christensen L, Dornhoffer J L. Bone-anchored hearing aids for unilateral hearing loss in teenagers.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(8) 1120-1122
  • 25 Linstrom C J, Silverman C A, Yu G P. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119(4) 713-720
  • 26 Tringali S, Grayeli A B, Bouccara D et al.. A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;  265(12) 1461-1464
  • 27 Wazen J J, Young D L, Farrugia M C et al.. Successes and complications of the Baha system.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(8) 1115-1119
  • 28 Kunst S J, Hol M K, Mylanus E A, Leijendeckers J M, Snik A F, Cremers C W. Subjective benefit after BAHA system application in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing impairment.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(3) 353-358
  • 29 Hol M K, Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.  Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;  131(4) 321-325
  • 30 Hol M K, Spath M A, Krabbe P F et al.. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.  Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;  130(4) 394-399

Soha N GhossainiM.D. 

Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

H091, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033

Email: sghossaini@gmail.com

    >