Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31(3): 187-196
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1257535
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Clinical Influences

Brigette Larkins1 , 2
  • 1Communication Disability Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • 2Department of Speech Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 August 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Mark Ylvisaker influenced a paradigm shift on approaches to assessment and intervention of individuals with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). This article describes the influence of Mark Ylvisaker on my speech-language therapy practice in TBI rehabilitation, from shaping assessment research through supporting a practical, problem-solving approach to intervention. In this article, only a small selection of his therapeutic concepts and recommendations are described. The concepts selected—context and meaningfulness, collaboration, and measuring performance—are those that are pertinent to functional communication assessment. The three interventions chosen illustrate the applicability of Mark Ylvisaker's work in different contexts and across different levels of disability following TBI. They are also selected as they promote personally satisfying communication for the client and illustrate the contribution that speech-language therapy may make to TBI rehabilitation overall.

KEYWORDS

Interactional communication - functional communication

REFERENCES

  • 1 Frattali C. Functional assessment of communication: merging public policy with clinical views.  Aphasiology. 1992;  6 63-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Frattali C M. Perspectives on functional assessment: its use for policy making.  Disabil Rehabil. 1993;  15(1) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Everyday communicative activities of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand.  Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear. 1999;  4 4183-4191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McDonald S. The social and neuropsychological underpinnings of communication disorders after severe traumatic brain injury. In: Ball M, Damico J Clinical Aphasiology, Future Directions. A Festschrift for Chris Code. New York, NY; Psychology Press 2007: 42-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ylvisaker M, Holland A. Coaching, self coaching, and the rehabilitation of head injury. In: Johns D Clinical Management of Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Boston, MA; Little, Brown 1985: 243-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Szekeres S, Ylvisaker M, Holland A. Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: a framework for intervention. In: Ylvisaker M Head Injury Rehabilitation, Children and Adolescents. Newton, MA; Butterworth- Heinemann 1985: 219-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S. Metacognitive and executive impairment in head injured children and adults.  Top Lang Disord. 1989;  9 34-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ylvisaker M, Urbanczyk B, Feeney T J. Social skills following traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1992;  13(4) 308-322
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J, Urbanczyk B. A social-environmental approach to communication and behaviour after traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1993;  14(1) 84-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Larkins B. The application of the ICF in cognitive-communication disorders following traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 2007;  28(4) 334-342
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tate R L. Executive dysfunction and characterological changes after traumatic brain injury: two sides of the same coin?.  Cortex. 1999;  35(1) 39-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Godfrey H PD, Bishara S, Partridge F. Emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury: a stress-appraisal-coping formulation.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;  11 29-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: a new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18(3) 219-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Godfrey H PD, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14(4) 433-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ylvisaker M. Cognitive and behavioural outcomes in head injured children. Paper presented at: The International Symposium on the Traumatic Brain Injured Adult and Child October, 1981 Boston, MA;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 McDonald S. Putting communication disorders in context after traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14(4) 339-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S, Feeney T J. Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In: Chapey R Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD; Williams and Wilkins 2001: 745-809
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Holland A. A look into a cloudy crystal ball for specialists in neurogenic language disorders.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1994;  3 34-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Worrall L, Hickson L. Communication Disability in Aging: From Prevention to Intervention. Clifton Park, NY; Thompson, Delmar Learning 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Worrall L. The functional communication perspective. In: Code C, Muller D. Treatment of Aphasia: From Theory to Practice. London, United Kingdom; Whurr 1995: 47-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Assessment and treatment of functional communication in cognitive communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. In: Worrall L, Frattali C Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A Functional Approach. New York, NY; Thieme 2000: 206-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Holland A. When is aphasia, aphasia? The problem of closed head injury. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK 1982: 345-349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Worrall L. A conceptual framework for a functional approach to acquired neurogenic disorders and swallowing. In: Worrall L, Frattalli C Neurogenic Communication Disorders. A Functional Approach. New York, NY; Thieme 2000: 3-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hartley L. Assessment of functional communication. In: Tupper D, Cicerone K The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies. Boston, MA; Kluwer Academic 1990: 125-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McGann W, Werven G, Douglas M M. Social competence and head injury: a practical approach.  Brain Inj. 1997;  11(9) 621-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Linscott R J, Knight R G, Godfrey H PD. The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): a measure of communication impairment for clinical use.  Brain Inj. 1996;  10(6) 397-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Douglas J, O'Flaherty C, Snow P. Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 251-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 MacDonald S, Johnson C J. Assessment of subtle cognitive-communication deficits following acquired brain injury: A normative study of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES).  Brain Inj. 2005;  19(11) 895-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Developing a traumatic brain injury index for social and vocational communication outcomes (SAVCO).  Brain Impair. 2008;  9(3) 247-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 World Health Organisation .International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland; WHO 2001
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Worrall LM, Frattali CM Neurogenic Communication Disorders. A Functional Approach. New York, NY; Thieme 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Worrall L, McCooey R, Davidson B, Larkins B, Hickson L. The validity of functional assessments of communication and the Activity/Participation components of the ICIDH-2: do they reflect what really happens in real-life?.  J Commun Disord. 2002;  35(2) 107-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S. Communication disorders associated with closed head injury. In: Chapey R Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. 4th ed. Baltimore, Maryland; Williams and Wilkins 1994: 546-568
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Executive functions after traumatic brain injury: supported cognition and self-advocacy.  Semin Speech Lang. 1996;  17(3) 217-232
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention, Positive Everyday Routines. San Diego, CA; Singular 1998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Communication and behaviour: collaboration between speech-language pathologists and behavioral psychologist.  Top Lang Disord. 1994;  1 37-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Traumatic brain injury in adolescence: assessment and reintegration.  Semin Speech Lang. 1995;  15 32-45
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;  17(3) 191-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H E, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury: a review.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18(1) 7-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Use of multiple methods to determine items relevant for a functional communication assessment.  New Zealand J Speech-Language Therapy. 2005;  59 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Larkins B M, Worrall L E, Hickson L M. Stakeholder opinion of functional communication activities following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2004;  18(7) 691-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Larkins B. Functional communication assessment of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand. Unpublished doctoral thesis Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland 2004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hagen C. Language disorders secondary to closed head injury: diagnosis and treatment.  Top Lang Disord. 1981;  1 73-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Togher L. Traumatic brain injury, advanced communication training perspectives. In: Ball M, Damico J Clinical Aphasiology, Future Directions. A Festschrift for Chris Code. New York, NY; Psychology Press 2007: 270-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Togher L, Hand L, Code C. A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges.  Disabil Rehabil. 1996;  18(11) 559-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Togher L. Giving information: the importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 365-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Togher L, McDonald S, Code C, Grant S. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 313-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J, Urbanczyk B. Developing a positive communication culture for rehabilitation: communication training for staff and family members. In: Durgin CJ, Schmidt ND, Fryer LJ Staff Development and Clinical Intervention in Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, MD; Aspen 1993: 57-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Feeney T. Mark and Tim Unplugged. Keynote Presentation at: JBM 5th TBI Functional Rehabilitation Conference July, 2006 Auckland, New Zealand;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Brigette LarkinsPh.D. M.Ed. M.N.Z.S.T.A. 

Associate Member Communication Disability Centre

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Email: brigette.larkins@gmail.com

      >