RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273409
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Transvaginal Cervical Length Measurements and Quantitative Ultrasound Tissue Characterization of the Cervix in the Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy
Intra- und Interobserver-Reliabilität von transvaginaler Zervixlängenmessung und quantitativer sonografischer Gewebetypisierung der Zervix im zweiten und dritten Trimester der SchwangerschaftPublikationsverlauf
received: 28.10.2010
accepted: 2.5.2011
Publikationsdatum:
31. Mai 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Bestimmung der Intra- und Interobserver-Reliabilität der transvaginalen Zervixlängenmessung und der quantitativen sonografischen Gewebetypisierung (QUTC). Material und Methoden: Bei 20 Frauen im zweiten und dritten Trimester wurde eine transvaginale Sonografie der Zervix von 2 Untersuchern mit jeweils 3 Untersuchungen pro Patientin durchgeführt. Zervixlänge und QUTC wurden bestimmt. Wiederholbarkeitskoeffizient, Intraclass-Korrelationskoeffizient und Interclass-Korrelationskoeffizient wurden berechnet sowie die Bland-Altman-Methode angewandt. Ergebnisse: Der Wiederholbarkeitskoeffizient für die transvaginale Zervixlängenmessung betrug 0,95 bei Untersucher 1 und 0,99 bei Untersucher 2. Die entsprechenden Intraclass-Korrelationskoeffizienten waren 0,872 und 0,973. Der Interclass-Korrelationskoeffizient für die Zervixlänge betrug 0,986 und die mittlere Interobserver-Differenz war –2 mm. Die Übereinstimmungsgrenzen nach der Bland-Altmann-Methode betrugen –5,4 mm bis 1,5 mm. Der Wiederholbarkeitskoeffizient für die QUTC betrug 0,90 bei Untersucher 1 und 0,97 bei Untersucher 2. Die entsprechenden Intraclass-Korrelationskoeffizienten waren 0,74 und 0,9. Der Interclass-Korrelationskoeffizient für QUTC betrug 0,56 und die mittlere Interobserver-Differenz war 0,14. Die Übereinstimmungsgrenzen nach der Bland-Altman-Methode waren weit und betrugen –22,46 bis 22,74. Schlussfolgerung: Die transvaginale Zervixlängenmessung zeigt eine hohe Intra- und Interobserver-Reliabilität. QUTC zeigt eine nur eine geringe Interobserver-Reliabilität und sollte daher gegenwärtig nicht im klinischen Alltag angewendet werden.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal ultrasound measurements of cervical length and quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization (QUTC). Materials and Methods: 20 healthy women in the second and third trimester of pregnancy underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination of the cervix by two sonographers. 3 replicate vaginal measurements of cervical length and QUTC were taken by each observer for each woman. The repeatability coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient as well as the interclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement were calculated. Results: The reliability coefficient for transvaginal cervical length measurements was 0.95 for sonographer 1 and 0.99 for sonographer 2. The corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for cervical length measurements were 0.872 and 0.973. The interclass correlation coefficient for transvaginal cervical length measurements was 0.986, the mean interobserver difference was –2 mm, and the limits of agreement were –5.4 mm to 1.5 mm. The reliability coefficients for QUTC were 0.90 (sonographer 1) and 0.97 (sonographer 2) and the corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for cervical length measurements were 0.74 and 0.9. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.56, the mean interobserver difference was 0.14, and the limits of agreement were –22.46 to 22.74. Conclusion: Transvaginal cervical length measurements showed a high intraobserver and interobserver reliability, while quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization had poor interobserver reliability and should currently not be applied in clinical practice.
Key words
quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization - cervical length - intraobserver reliability - interobserver reliability
References
- 1
Iams J.
Prevention of preterm birth.
N Engl J Med.
1998;
338
54-56
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Moster D, Lie R L, Markestad T.
Long-Term Medical and Social Consequences of Preterm Birth.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
359
262-273
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Kobaly K, Schluchter M, Minich N et al.
Outcomes of extremely low birth weight (< 1 kg) and extremely low gestational age
(< 28 weeks) infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: effects of practice changes
in 2000 to 2003.
Pediatrics.
2008;
121
73-81
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Hack M, Taylor H G, Drotar D et al.
Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged
children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990 s.
JAMA.
2005;
294
318-325
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Berkowitz G S.
An epidemiologic study of preterm delivery.
Am J Epidemiol.
1981;
113
81-92
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Levkoff A H, Westphal M, Miller 3 rd M C et al.
Maternal risk factors in infants with very low birth weight.
Obstet Gynecol.
1982;
60
612-616
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Papiernik E, Kaminski M.
Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. I. A study
of the frequency of 30 predictive characteristics.
J Perinat Med.
1974;
2
30-36
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Shiono P H, Klebanoff M A, Graubard B I et al.
Birth weight among women of different ethnic groups.
JAMA.
1986;
255
48-52
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Iams J D, Goldenberg R L, Meis P J et al.
The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network.
N Engl J Med.
1996;
334
567-572
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Kagan K O, To M, Tsoi E et al.
Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length.
BJOG.
2006;
113
52-56
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Jörn H, Kalf K, Schwann R et al.
Grey-scale texture analysis of the cervix in pregnancy.
Ultraschall in Med.
2006;
27
347-54
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Heller F, Voigt F, Schrauder M et al.
B-Bildanalyse der Zervix vor der medikamentösen Geburtseinleitung – Können Rückschlüsse
auf den weiteren Geburtsverlauf gezogen werden?.
Ultraschall in Med.
2010;
31
S01
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Maeda K, Utsu M, Yamamoto N et al.
Echogenicity of fetal lung and liver quantified by the grey-level histogram width.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
1999;
25
201-208
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Maeda K, Utsu M, Kihaile P E.
Quantification of sonographic echogenicity with grey-level histogram width: a clinical
tissue characterization.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
1998;
24
225-234
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Tekesin I, Hellmeyer L, Heller G et al.
Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix and cervical
length in the prediction of premature delivery for patients with spontaneous preterm
labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
189
532-539
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Tekesin I, Wallwiener D, Schmidt S.
The value of quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix and rapid
fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery.
J Perinat Med.
2005;
33
383-391
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Tekesin I, Anderer G, Hellmeyer L et al.
Assessment of fetal lung development by quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization:
a methodical study.
Prenat Diagn.
2004;
24
671-676
MissingFormLabel
- 18 Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Bartko J J.
The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability.
Psychol Rep.
1966;
19
3-11
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Fleiss J L, Cohen J.
The equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coeffcient as measures
of reliability.
Educ Psychol Meas.
1973;
2
113-117
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Khan K S, Chien P FW.
Evaluation of a clinical test. I: Assessment of reliability.
Br J ObstetGynaecol.
2001;
108
562-567
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
1
307-310
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Valentin L, Bergelin I.
Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length
and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
20
256-262
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Burger M, Weber-Rössler T, Willman M.
Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study
and new standards to improve the interobserver variability.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
9
188-193
MissingFormLabel
- 25 Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Kranmer M S, Finstein A R.
Clinical biostatistics. The biostatistics of concordance.
Clin Pharmacol Ther.
1981;
29
111-123
MissingFormLabel
- 27 Altman D G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994: 403-409
MissingFormLabel
Dr. Werner Stein
Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin
Robert-Koch-Straße 40
37075 Göttingen
Telefon: ++ 49/5 51/39 65 05
Fax: ++ 49/5 51/39 65 61
eMail: werner.stein@med.uni-goettingen.de