Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2011; 15(3): 95-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273461
Literaturstudie

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Empfehlungen zur Manuellen Therapie bei lumbalen Rückenschmerzen in klinischen Leitlinien

Systematischer ReviewRecommendations for Manual Therapy in Low Back Pain Clinical GuidelinesA Systematic ReviewJ. Grothues1 , J.-F. Chenot2
  • 1Fakultät Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit, HAWK Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst Hildesheim
  • 2Abt. Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 27.10.2010

Manuskript akzeptiert: 1.3.2011

Publication Date:
25 July 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Leitlinien gewinnen für Physiotherapeuten und Ärzte bei der Versorgung von Patienten mit lumbalen Rückenschmerzen (LRS) immer mehr an Bedeutung. Frühere Übersichtsarbeiten zeigen, dass die Manuelle Therapie in Leitlinien kontrovers bewertet wurde. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersuchte die Empfehlungen für Manuelle Therapie und deren Grundlage in ab 2001 veröffentlichten klinischen Leitlinien.

Bei Patienten mit akuten und chronischen LRS ist Manuelle Therapie eine leitliniengerechte Behandlungsform. Die Empfehlungen der Leitlinien sind aber sehr unspezifisch und bieten dem Nutzer nur eine geringe Unterstützung bei der klinischen Entscheidungsfindung. Für bessere und spezifischere Leitlinienempfehlungen ist mehr und einträglichere Forschung erforderlich.

Abstract

Clinical guidelines are gaining increasing importance for physiotherapists and physicians in the care of patients with low back pain (LBP). Previous reviews show that manual therapy is discussed controversially in these guidelines. This article investigated recommendations for manual therapy and their basis in clinical guidelines published from 2001 onwards.

In acute and chronic LBP manual therapy is a guideline-compatible treatment option. However, the guidelines are very unspecific and hardly support the user in clinical decision making. More research and better evidence is needed to strengthen and specify guideline recommendations for the use of manual therapy.

Schlüsselwörter

klinische Leitlinien - lumbale Rückenschmerzen - Manuelle Therapie - spinale Manipulationen - systematischer Review

Key words

clinical guidelines - low back pain - manual therapy - spinal manipulation - systematic review

Literatur

  • 1 AGREE Collaboration .Checkliste zur Qualitätsbeurteilung von Leitlinien (AGREE-Instrument) - Deutschsprachige Version. 2001 http://www.agreecollaboration.org/pdf/de.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 2 AGREE Collaboration . Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.  Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;  12 18-23
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Airaksinen O, Brox J I, Cedraschi C et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic non specific low back pain. 2004 DOI: www.backpaineurope.org/web/files/WG2_Guidelines.pdf (Europa)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Arnau J M, Vallano A, Lopez A et al. A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment.  Eur Spine J. 2006;  15 543-553
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Ashton J, Butler M, Bridge et al. New Zealand Acute Low Back Pain Guide. 2004 http://www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/0072/acc1038_col.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Assendelft W JJ, Morten S C, Yu E I et al. Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain.  Chochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  1 CD000447
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Borkan J M, Koes B, Reis S et al. A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain. Reexamining priorities.  Spine. 1998;  23 1992-1996
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Boyling J D, Jull G A. Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy. The Vertebral Column. Edingburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Brooks P, March L, Bogduk N et al. Evidence-Based Management of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain. A Guide for Clinicians. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press; 2004 http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp94syn.htm
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Vereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Gesellschaften (AWMF) .Versorgungsleitlinie Kreuzschmerz. 2010 http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/kreuzschmerz
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Cherkin D C, Sherman K J, Deyo R A et al. A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy and spinal manipulation for back pain.  Ann Intern Med. 2003;  138 898-906
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Childs J D, Fritz M J, Flynn T W et al. A Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely to Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study.  Ann Int Med. 2004;  141 920-928
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S et al. Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.  BMJ. 2008;  337 979-983
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Deyo R A. Diagnostic evaluation of LBP: reaching a specific diagnosis is often impossible.  Arch Intern Med. 2002;  162 1444-1447
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Evans D W, Lucas N. What is „manipulation”? A reappraisal.  Manual Therapy. 2010;  15 286-229
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Field M J, Lohr K N. Guidelines for clinical practice. From development to use. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J et al. A Clinical Prediction Rule for Classifying Patients with Low Back Pain Who Demonstrate Short-Term Improvement with Spinal Manipulation.  Spine. 2002;  24 2835-2843
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Fritz J M, Cleland J A, Childs J D. Subgrouping Patients with Low Back Pain: Evolution of a Classification Approach to Physical Therapy.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;  37 290-302
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hancock M J, Maher C G, Latimer J et al. Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomized controlled trial.  Eur Spine J. 2008;  17 936-943
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Heijmans W FGJ, Hendriks H JM, Esch van der M et al. KNGF-Guideline. Manual Therapy on low back pain. 2003 http://www.kngfrichtlijnen.nl/downloads/Manual_Therapy_in_case_of_Low_Back_Pain_Guideline.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Institue of Health Economics .Ambassador Program Guideline for the Management of Low Back Pain. Background Document. 2009 http://www.ihe.ca/research/ambassador-program/--low-back-pain/methods
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Institute of Health Economics .Guideline for the Evidence-Informed Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain. 2009 http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/informed_practice/clinical_practice_guidelines/complete%20set/Low%20Back%20Pain/backpain_guideline.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 23 International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists .Standards dokumentieren. 2005 http://www.ifomt.org/pdf/Standards_Document_dtFinalVersion.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Kamper S J, Maher C G, Hancock M J et al. Treatment-Based subgroups of low back pain: A guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;  24 181-191
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Koes B W, Tulder van M, Ostelo R et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.  Spine. 2001;  26 2504-2513
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Koes B W, Tulder van M, Lin C W et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.  Eur Spine J. 2010;  DOI: 10.1007 /s00586-010-1502-y
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Kunz R, Burnand B, Schünemann H J. Das GRADE-System. Ein internationaler Ansatz zur Vereinheitlichung der Graduierung von Evidenz und Empfehlungen in Leitlinien.  Internist. 2008;  49 673-680
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Laerum E, Dullerud R, Kirksola G et al. Acute low back pain. Interdisciplinary clinical guidelines. Oslo: The Norwegian Back Pain Network; 2002 http://www.ifomt.org/pdf/Norway_Acute_Low_Back.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 29 May S, Littlewood C, Bishop A. Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: A systematic review.  Aust J Physioth. 2006;  52 91-102
    Google Scholar
  • 30 May S, Rosedale R. Prescriptive Clinical Prediction Rules in Back Pain Research: A Systematic Review.  J Man Manip Ther. 2009;  17 36-45
    Google Scholar
  • 31 McCarthy C H, Arnall F A, Strimpakos N et al. The biopsychosocial classification of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.  Physical Therapy Reviews. 2004;  9 17-30
    Google Scholar
  • 32 McCarthy C, Keating J L, Kent P M et al. Targeted manual therapy for non-specific low-back pain (Protocol).  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;  Issue 3 CD007135. DOI: 10.1002 / 14 651858.CD 007 135
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Murphy A Y, Teijlingen E R, Gobbi M O. Inconsistent grading of evidence across countries: a review of low back pain guidelines.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;  29 576-581
    Google Scholar
  • 34 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence .The Guidelines Manual. 2009 http://www.nice.org.uk/media/5F2/44/The_guidelines_manual_2009_-_All_chapters.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Negrini van S, Giovannoni S, Minozzi S et al. Diagnostic therapeutic flow-charts for low back pain patients: the Italian clinical guidelines.  Eura Medicophys. 2006;  42 151-170. www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/europa-medicophysica/article.php?cod=R33Y2006N02A0151
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Savigny P, Kuntze S, Watson P et al. Low Back Pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009 http://www.guidance.nice.org.uk/CG88
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Schmidt C O, Raspe H, Pfingsten M et al. Back Pain in the German Adult Population: Prevalence, Severity, and Sociodemographic Correlates in a Multiregional survey.  Spine. 2007;  15 2005-2011
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Shapiro C M. Comment on: Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain.  Ann Intern Med. 2004;  140 665
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Shekelle P G, Adams A H, Chassin M R et al. Spinal manipulation for low back pain.  Ann Int Med. 1992;  117 590-598
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Stanton T R, Hancock M J, Maher C G et al. Critical Appraisal of Clinical Prediction Rules That Aim to Optimize Treatment Selection for Musculoskeletal Conditions.  Phys Ther. 2010;  90 843-854
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Thorson D C, Bonsell J, Hecht S et al. ICSI Institute for Clinical System Improvement. Health care guideline. Adult low back pain. 2008 http://www.icsi.org/low_back_pain/adult_low_back_pain__8.html
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Van Tulder M, Koes B W, Bouter L M. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials of the most common interventions.  Spine. 1997;  22 2128-2156
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. 2004 http://www.backpaineurope.org/web/files/WG1_Guidelines.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 44 UK BEAM Trial Team . United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: Cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.  BMJ. 2004;  329 1381-1385
    Google Scholar

Johannes Grothues

B.Sc. PT, HAWK Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst Hildesheim, Fakultät Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit

Email: J.Grothues@gmx.de

      >