Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1275845
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Erkrankungen durch humane Papillomviren
Quo vadis HPV-Impfung?Diseases caused by human papilloma viruses Quo vadis vaccination?Publication History
eingereicht: 17.10.2010
akzeptiert: 27.01.2011
Publication Date:
10 May 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Humane Papillomviren können die Haut infizieren und sowohl gut- als auch bösartige Tumoren induzieren. HPV 6 und 11 sind die Ursache von bis zu 90 % der Genitalwarzen. Fast jedes Zervixkarzinom ist mit HPV assoziiert. HPV 16 und 18 induzieren bis zu 70 % der zervikalen Neoplasien. Die HPV-Impfung ist eine international anerkannte Routineimpfung, die laut STIKO für alle Mädchen von 12 – 17 empfohlen wird. Sie birgt die Chance, ca. 70 % der Zervixkarzinome und ca. 50 % der Vorstufen zu verhindern. Umfangreiche Studien zeigen die gute Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit der beiden verfügbaren Impfstoffe. Gardasil® richtet sich gegen HPV 6, 11, 16 und 18, Cervarix® gegen HPV 16 und 18. Durch die tetravalente HPV-Impfung können mehr als 90 % der Genitalwarzen verhindert werden. Die bivalente HPV-Vakzine weist durch die Kreuzprotektion (gegen 16, 18, 31, 33, 45) einen breiten Schutz vor höhergradigen CIN-Läsionen auf. Die Herstellung von VLPs stellt eine innovative Technologie in der Impfstoffproduktion dar. Eine Vergleichstudie der beiden Impfstoffe ergab eine signifikant höhere Immugenität bei Cervarix®. Die jährliche Krebsfrüherkennungsuntersuchung bleibt essentiell als sekundäre Präventionsmaßnahme. Im internationalen Vergleich ist die HPV-Impfrate in Deutschland niedrig. Persönliche Beratung und Empfehlung sind maßgebliche Kriterien für die Impfentscheidung.
Abstract
Human papilloma viruses are responsible for a large number of benign and malignant lesions of the skin. HPV 6 and 11 cause up to 90 % of condylomata. Almost each cervical cancer is associated with HPV. HPV 16 und 18 induce up to 70 % of cervical neoplasias. The vaccination against HPV is internationally implemented and should be applied to young girls aged 12 to 17 according to STIKO criteria. The vaccination may reduce the rate of cervical cancer by 70 % and the rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by 50 %. Many studies demonstrated the efficacy and safetyness of both vaccines. Gardasil® offers protection against HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18, Cervarix® against HPV 16 and 18. Protection against condylomata is offered by the quadrivalent vaccine in 90 %. The bivalent vaccine has demonstrated type-specific protection against the five most frequent cancer inducing types (16, 18, 31, 33, 45). The production of VLPs is an innovative technology. A comparison of both vaccines, Cervarix® and Gardasil®, showed a higher immunogenicity for Cervarix®. In Germany the immunization rates are still low comparing to other countries. As a method for secondary prevention of cervical cancer the PAP smear is still an effective method.
Schlüsselwörter
HPV-Vakzine - zervikale intraepitheliale Neoplasie (CIN) - CIN-Läsionen - humane Papillomviren - Zervixkarzinom
Key words
HPV vaccine - cercical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) - CIN lesions - human papilloma virus - cervical cancer
Literatur
- 1 Atkinson W, Wolfe S, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L. Human
papillomavirus. In: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, 11th
ed. Washington DC: Public Health Foundation; 2009
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Brown D R, Kjaer S K, Sigurdsson K. et al .
The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus
(HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on
infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in generally
HPV-naïve women aged 16 – 26
years.
J Infect Dis.
2009;
199
926-935
MissingFormLabel
- 3
David M P, Van Herck K, Hardt K. et al .
Long-term persistence of anti-HPV-16 and
-18 antibodies induced by vaccination with the AS04-adjuvanted cervical
cancer vaccine: modeling of sustained antibody responses.
Gynecol
Oncol.
2009;
115 (3 Suppl.)
S1-S6
MissingFormLabel
- 4
DeCarvalho N. et al .
Immunogenicity and safety of HPV-16/18
AS04-adjuvanted vaccine up to 7.3y. Abstract presented at the 25th
International Papillomavirus Conference; 8 – 14
May 2009, Malmö.
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Einstein M H, Baron M, Levin M J. et al .
Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety
of Cervarix® and Gardasil® human papillomavirus (HPV)
cervical cancer vaccines in healthy women aged 18 – 45
years.
Human Vaccines.
2009;
10
705-719
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Gnanamony M, Peedicayil A, Subhasini J. et al .
: Detection and quantification of HPV 16
and 18 in plasma of Indian women with cervival cancer.
Gynecol
Oncol.
2010;
116
447-451
MissingFormLabel
- 7 Hampl M. Gebärmutterhalskrebs und Genitalwarzen – Vorsorge durch
Impfung. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2009
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Hausmann R.
Prevention des Zervixcarcinoms in Gefahr?.
Gyne.
2009;
12
36-37
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Joura E A, Leodolter S, Hernandez-Avila M. et al .
Efficacy of a quadrivalent prophylactic
human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like-particle
vaccine against high-grade vulval and vaginal lesions: a combined
analysis of three randomised clinical trials.
Lancet.
2007;
369
1693-1702
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Joura E A, Kjaer S K, Wheeler C M. et al .
HPV antibody levels and
clinical efficacy following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent
HPV vaccine.
Vaccine.
2008;
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.073
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Khan M J, Castle P E, Lorincz A T. et al .
The elevated 10-year risk
of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV)
type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing
in clinical practice.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2005;
97
1072-1079
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Kjaer S K, van den Brule A J, Paull G. et al .
Type specific persistence
of high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) as indicator of high grade
cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women: population based
prospective follow up study.
Brit Med J.
2002;
325
572-578
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Munoz N, Bosch F X, de Sanjose S. et al .
Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus
types associated with cervical cancer.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
348
518-527
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Munoz N, Manalastas Jr R, Pitisuttithum P. et al .
Safety, immunogenicity and
efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16,
18) recombinant vaccine in women aged 24 – 45 years: a
randomised, double-blind trial.
Lancet.
2009;
373
1949-1957
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Paavonen J, Jenkins D, Bosch F X. et al .
Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent
L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus
types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III
double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2007;
369
2161-2170
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J. et al .
Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18
AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer
caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind,
randomised study in young women.
Lancet.
2009;
374
301-314
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Schreckenberger C, Kaufmann A, Schneider A.
Primäre Prävention des Zervixkarzinoms. HPV-Impfung
und deren molekularbiologischen Grundlagen.
Onkologe.
2006;
12
836-844
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Schwarz T F.
Clinical update of the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus-16/18
cervical cancer vaccine, Cervarix®.
Adv
Ther.
2009;
26
983-998
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Schwarz T F, Kocken M, Petäja T. et al .
Correlation between levels of human papillomavirus
(HPV)-16 and 18 antibodies in serum and cervicovaginal secretions
in girls and women vaccinated with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted
vaccine.
Hum Vacc.
2010;
6
1054-1061
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Sigurdsson K, Sigvaldason H, Gudmundsdottir T, Sigurdsson R, Briem H.
The efficacy of HPV 16/18 vaccines on sexually active
18 – 23 year old women and the impact
of HPV vaccination on organised cervical cancer screening.
Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2009;
88
27-35
MissingFormLabel
- 21 Skinner S R, Apter D, Chow S N. et al .Cross-protective efficacy of Cervarix® against
oncogenic HPV types beyond HPV-16/18. Presented at: International
Papillomavirus Conference; May 8 – 14,
2009; Malmo, Sweden. http://www.hpv2009.org
MissingFormLabel
- 22
STIKO .
Impfung
gegen humane Papillomaviren (HPV) für Mädchen von
12 bis 17 Jahren – Empfehlung und Begründung.
Epidemiol Bull.
2007;
12
97-103
MissingFormLabel
- 23
STIKO .
Impfung
gegen HPV – Aktuelle Bewertung der STIKO.
Epidemiol
Bull.
2009;
32
319-328
MissingFormLabel
- 24
The FUTURE II Study group .
Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent
high-grade cervical lesions.
N Engl J Med.
2007;
356
1915-1927
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Wheeler C M, Kjaer S K, Sigurdsson K. et al .
The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus
(HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on
infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in sexually
active women aged 16 – 26 years.
J
Infect Dis.
2009;
199
936-944
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Winer R L, Hughes J P, Feng Q. et al .
Condom use and the risk of genital human
papillomavirus infection in young women.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
354
2645-2654
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Zylka-Menhorn V, Meyer R.
In Deutschland wird spät
geimpft.
Dtsch Ärztebl.
2009;
106
1442
MissingFormLabel
PD Dr. Ursula Zollner
Universitäts-Frauenklinik Würzburg
Josef-Schneider-Str. 4
97080 Würzburg
Phone: 0931/201-25621
Fax: 0931/201-25406
Email: zollner_u@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de