Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281630
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Motorische Funktionen in der postprimären Neurorehabilitation: Der Bereich Mobilität des Assessments der Kliniken Schmieder (AKS/C)
Motor Function in Post-Primary Neurorehabilitation: The Mobility Domain of the Assessment of the Kliniken Schmieder (AKS/C)Publication History
eingereicht: 14.12.2010
angenommen: 2.5.2011
Publication Date:
07 September 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Die in der Neurorehabilitation am meisten verwendeten Assessments wurden verschiedentlich wegen ihrer ungenügenden Sensitivität kritisiert. Daher wurde in den Kliniken Schmieder in Deutschland das Assessment der Kliniken Schmieder/C (AKS/C) erarbeitet, das bei Patienten in der postprimären Rehabilitation die Motorik, Kognition, Kommunikation und die Fähigkeit zur Selbstversorgung erfasst.
Ziel: Bestimmung von Validität, Reliabilität und Responsivität des Bereichs Mobilität des AKS/C.
Methode: Patienten mit verschiedenen Diagnosen in der postprimären Neurorehabilitation (n = 31 bei Eintritt, n = 24 bei Austritt) wurden getestet. Für die Bestimmung der Validität fand der Vergleich der AKS/C-Daten mit den Mobilitätsitems des FIM statt. Die Bestimmung der Reliabilität erfolgte mittels Intraklassen-Korrelations- (ICC) sowie Cronbach-Alpha-Koeffizient und die Responsivität mittels Standardised Response Mean (SRM).
Ergebnisse: Validität (ICC = 0,93) und Reliabilität (ICC = 0,86 – 0,99; Cronbach Alpha = 0,95) des AKS/C waren gut. Die Responsivität (SRM = 1,3) lag etwas höher als die der FIM-Mobilitätsitems (SRM = 1,2). Die Kombination des AKS/C mit den FIM-Mobilitätsitems erhöhte die Responsivität nicht.
Schlussfolgerung: Der Bereich Mobilität des AKS/C erwies sich als valides, reliables und responsives Assessment zur Erfassung der motorischen Fähigkeiten von Patienten mit verschiedenen Diagnosen in der postprimären Neurorehabilitation.
Abstract
Background: The most used assessments in neuro-rehabilitation were often criticized because of their insufficient sensitivity. For this purpose, the Kliniken Schmieder in Germany have developed the Assessment of the Kliniken Schmieder/C (AKS/C) in order to collect motor function, cognition, communication and self-care competence of post-primary rehabilitation patients.
Objective: To determine validity, reliability and responsiveness of the AKS/C motor domain.
Method: Patients with various neurologic diagnoses in post-primary rehabilitation (n = 31 at admission, n = 24 at discharge) were tested. For concurrent validity determination AKS/C data were compared with those of FIM mobility and locomotor items. For assessing reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cronbach’s Alpha and for assessing responsiveness standardised response mean (SRM) were calculated.
Results: Validity (ICC = 0.93) and reliability (ICC = 0.86 – 0.99; Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.95) of AKS/C were good. Responsiveness of the AKS/C was slightly higher (SRM = 1.3) than of FIM motor items (SRM = 1.2). Combination of AKS/C and FIM items did not increase responsiveness.
Conclusion: The motor domain of the AKS/C proved to be a valid, reliable and responsive motor function assessment tool for patients in post-primary neuro-rehabilitation.
Schlüsselwörter
Mobilität - Neurorehabilitation - Reliabilität - Responsivität - Validität
Key words
mobility - neuro-rehabilitation - reliability - responsiveness - validity
Literatur
- 1
Atkinson G, Nevill A M.
Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant
to sports medicine.
Sports Med.
1998;
26
217-238
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W. et al .Multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin: Springer; 2003
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
1
307-310
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Chou C Y, Chien C W, Hsueh I P et al.
Developing a short form of the Berg Balance Scale for people with stroke.
Phys Ther.
2006;
86
195-204
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Cohen M E, Marino R J.
The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2000;
81
S21-S29
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Damron L A, Dearth D J, Hoffman R L et al.
Quantification of the corticospinal silent period evoked via transcranial magnetic
stimulation.
J Neurosci Methods.
2008;
173
121-128
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Granger C V, Hamilton B B, Linacre J M et al.
Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
1993;
72
84-89
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F et al.
The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe.
J Rehabil Med.
2001;
33
273-278
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Hartmann A, Knols R, Murer K et al.
Reproducibility of an isokinetic strength-testing protocol of the knee and ankle in
older adults.
Gerontology.
2009;
55
259-268
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Holmes W C, Shea J A.
Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic
seropositive individuals.
Qual Life Res.
1997;
6
561-571
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Husted J A, Cook R J, Farewell V T et al.
Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.
J Clin Epidemiol.
2000;
53
459-468
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Jette D U, Warren R L, Wirtalla C.
Functional independence domains in patients receiving rehabilitation in skilled nursing
facilities: evaluation of psychometric properties.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2005;
86
1089-1094
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Lin J, Lo S, Chang Y et al.
Validation of comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke survivors.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci.
2004;
20
287-294
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Mahoney F I, Barthel D W.
Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index.
Md State Med J.
1965;
14
61-65
MissingFormLabel
- 15
McHorney C A, Ware Jr J E, Lu J F et al.
The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling
assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.
Med Care.
1994;
32
40-66
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Middleton J W, Harvey L A, Batty J et al.
Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM
in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury.
Spinal Cord.
2006;
44
495-504
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Post M W, Port I G, Kap van de B et al.
Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation
(USER).
Clin Rehabil.
2009;
23
909-917
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Van der Putten J J, Hobart J C, Freeman J A et al.
Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness
of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
1999;
66
480-484
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Rankin G, Stokes M.
Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate
statistical analyses.
Clin Rehabil.
1998;
12
187-199
MissingFormLabel
- 20 Schönle PW, Stemmer B. Neurologische Rehabilitation in den Phasen B, C, D und E. Praxis und Prognose. Bad Honnef; Hippocampus, 2000
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Seel R T, Wright G, Wallace T et al.
The utility of the FIM + FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
J Head Trauma Rehabil.
2007;
22
267-277
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Suzuki M, Yamada S, Omori M et al.
Development of the upper-body dressing scale for a buttoned shirt: a preliminary correlational
study.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
2008;
87
740-749
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T et al.
The UK FIM + FAM: development and evaluation. Functional Assessment Measure.
Clin Rehabil.
1999;
13
277-287
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger (VDR) .
Phaseneinteilung in der neurologischen Rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation.
1995;
34
119-127
MissingFormLabel
Klaus Starrost
PT MSc, Kliniken Schmieder
Zum Tafelholz 8
78476 Allensbach
Email: K.Starrost@Kliniken-Schmieder.de