Skull Base 2011; 21(6): 373-378
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1287678
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Qualitative and Quantitative Radio-Anatomical Variation of the Posterior Clinoid Process

Asem Salma1 , Nishanta B. Baidya1 , Benjamin Wendt1 , Francisco Aguila2 , Steffen Sammet2 , Mario Ammirati1
  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
  • 2Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to investigate the radiological anatomy of the posterior clinoid process (PCP) to highlight preoperative awareness of its variations and its relationships to other skull base landmarks. The PCPs of 36, three-dimensional computed tomographic cadaveric heads were evaluated by studying the gross anatomy of the PCP and by measuring the distances between the PCP and other skull base anatomical landmarks relevant to transnasal or transcranial skull base approaches. PCP variations were found in five specimens (14%): in two the dorsum sellae was absent, in one the PCP and the anterior clinoid process (ACP) were connected unilaterally and in two bilaterally. The mean distance between the right/left PCP and the crista galli was 45.14 ± 4.0 standard deviation (SD_/46.24 ± 4.5 SD, respectively, while the distance to the middle point of the basion at the level of the foramen magnum was 40.41 ± 5.1 SD/41.0 ± 5.2 SD, respectively. The mean distance between the PCP and the ACP was 12.03 ± 3.18 SD on the right side and 12.11 ± 2.77 SD on the left. The data provided highlights the importance of careful preoperative evaluation of the PCP and of its relationships to other commonly encountered skull base landmarks. This information may give an idea of the exposure achievable through different transcranial and transnasal approaches. This is especially relevant when neuronavigation is not available.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Aziz K M, van Loveren H R, Tew Jr J M, Chicoine M R. The Kawase approach to retrosellar and upper clival basilar aneurysms.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 (6) 1225-1234 discussion 1234-1236
  • 2 Figueiredo E G, Zabramski J M, Deshmukh P, Crawford N R, Preul M C, Spetzler R F. Anatomical and quantitative description of the transcavernous approach to interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns. Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 2006;  104 (6) 957-964
  • 3 Sugita K, Kobayashi S, Takemae T, Tada T, Tanaka Y. Aneurysms of the basilar artery trunk.  J Neurosurg. 1987;  66 (4) 500-505
  • 4 Inoue T, Rhoton Jr A L, Theele D, Barry M E. Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus: a microsurgical study.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  26 (6) 903-932
  • 5 Sekhar L N, Burgess J, Akin O. Anatomical study of the cavernous sinus emphasizing operative approaches and related vascular and neural reconstruction.  Neurosurgery. 1987;  21 (6) 806-816
  • 6 Nutik S L. Pterional craniotomy via a transcavernous approach for the treatment of low-lying distal basilar artery aneurysms.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  89 (6) 921-926
  • 7 Youssef A S, van Loveren H R. Posterior clinoidectomy: dural tailoring technique and clinical application.  Skull Base. 2009;  19 (3) 183-191
  • 8 Salma A, Wang S, Ammirati M. Extradural endoscope-assisted subtemporal posterior clinoidectomy: a cadaver investigation study.  Neurosurgery. 2010;  67 (3, Suppl Operative) ons43-ons48 discussion ons48
  • 9 Kassam A B, Prevedello D M, Thomas A et al. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary transposition for a transdorsum sellae approach to the interpeduncular cistern.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62 (3, Suppl 1) 57-72 discussion 72-74
  • 10 Nagasawa S, Ohta T. Exostosis of the posterior clinoid process.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;  126 (2-4) 195-197
  • 11 Paul S, Das S. Anomalous posterior clinoid processes and its clinical importance.  Columbia-Médica. 2007;  38 (3) 301-304
  • 12 Ozdogmus O, Saka E, Tulay C, Gurdal E, Uzun I, Cavdar S. Ossification of interclinoid ligament and its clinical significance.  Neuroanatomy. 2003;  2 25-27
  • 13 Ono M, Rhoton Jr A L, Barry M. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the tentorial incisura.  J Neurosurg. 1984;  60 (2) 365-399
  • 14 Berger P E, Harwood-Nash D C, Fitz C R. The dorsum sellae in infancy and childhood.  Pediatr Radiol. 1976;  4 (4) 214-220
  • 15 Tubbs R S, Salter E G, Oakes W J. Quantitation of and measurements utilizing the sphenoid ridge.  Clin Anat. 2007;  20 (2) 131-134
  • 16 Kassam A, Snyderman C H, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau R L. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica.  Neurosurg Focus. 2005;  19 (1) E3
  • 17 Wang Q, Lan Q, Lu X J. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the suprasellar region: anatomic study and clinical considerations.  J Clin Neurosci. 2010;  17 (3) 342-346
  • 18 Song M, Zong X, Wang X et al. Anatomic study of the anterior skull base via an endoscopic transnasal approach.  Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;  113 (4) 281-284
  • 19 Kassam A, Snyderman C H, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau R L. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum.  Neurosurg Focus. 2005;  19 (1) E4
  • 20 Kassam A B, Prevedello D M, Carrau R L et al. The front door to Meckel's cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach- technical considerations and clinical series.  Neurosurgery. 2009;  64 (3, Suppl) 71-82 discussion 82-83
  • 21 Cavallo L M, Cappabianca P, Galzio R, Iaconetta G, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the cavernous sinus versus transcranial route: anatomic study.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  56 (2, Suppl) 379-389 discussion 379-389
  • 22 Abuzayed B, Tanriover N, Gazioglu N, Ozlen F, Cetin G, Akar Z. Endoscopic anatomy and approaches of the cavernous sinus: cadaver study.  Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;  32 (5) 499-508
  • 23 Ziyal I M, Bilginer B, Ozcan O E, Basar R, Sekhar L N, Ozgen T. Course and relationship of cranial nerves from end organs through foraminas to root entry zones. How far can they be mobilized: an anatomical study.  Neuroanatomy. 2004;  3 46-50

Mario AmmiratiM.D. M.B.A. 

Department of Neurological Surgery, N1025 Doan Hall

410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210

Email: mario.ammirati@osumc.edu

    >