Aktuelle Rheumatologie 2013; 38(01): 45-49
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1301928
Übersichtsarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Kardiovaskuläre Risiken der Therapie mit Zyklooxygenasehemmern (NSAR): Biomarker als Risikoindikatoren?

Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors (NSAIDs): Biomarkers for Risk Assessment?
K. Brune
1   Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
,
F. Ren
2   Harvard Medical School, TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, Boston, United States
,
C. T. Ruff
2   Harvard Medical School, TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, Boston, United States
,
B. Renner
1   Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. Februar 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Nicht-steroidale Antiphlogistika sind als Schmerzmittel unverzichtbar. Sie stehen wegen unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen (zuletzt: Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen) in der öffentlichen Kritik. Gerade ältere Menschen können ohne diese Wirkstoffe kaum auskommen. Da es an Alternativen mangelt, geht es darum, diejenigen Patienten zu erkennen, die ein besonders hohes kardiovaskuläres Risiko beim Gebrauch dieser Wirkstoffe aufweisen. Wir berichten über Untersuchungen zur Wertigkeit des „Biomarkers“ NTproBNP als Prädiktor für kardiovaskuläre Probleme bei Patienten unter Langzeitbehandlung mit Zyklooxygenasehemmern. Im Gegensatz zum hsCRP zeigt NTproBNP ein erhöhtes Risiko für kardiovaskuläre Probleme zuverlässig an.

Abstract

Non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, inhibitors of cyclooxygenases) are still worldwide the most intensively used remedies. These compounds are reliable therapeutics for muscle, joint, back, and traumatic pain. They cause, however, many unwanted side effects. Recently, the propensity of these compounds to cause cardiovascular diseases has been highlighted. As there are no alternatives available, attempts are made to single out those patients who are likely to develop unwanted cardiovascular drug effects when treated with NSAIDs. 2 widely used biomarkers were investigated as predictors of cardiovascular risks aggravated by the treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors. We here report on positive results of such evaluations employing the biomarker NTproBNP.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Schwabe U, Paffrath D. Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2011. Springer-Verlag; 2011
  • 2 Brune K, Renner B, Hinz B. Using pharmacokinetic principles to optimize pain therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010; 6: 589-598
  • 3 Grosser T, Fries S, FitzGerald GA. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 4-15
  • 4 Grosser T, Yu Y, FitzGerald GA. Emotion recollected in tranquility: lessons learned from the COX-2 saga. Annu Rev Med 2010; 61: 17-33
  • 5 Marnett LJ. The COXIB experience: a look in the rearview mirror. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2009; 49: 265-290
  • 6 Solomon DH, Rassen JA, Glynn RJ et al. The comparative safety of analgesics in older adults with arthritis. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1968-1976
  • 7 BÄK, KBV, AWMF. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz – Langfassung. Version 1.2. 2011. Im Internet http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/kreuzschmerz Stand: 08.2011; Zugriff: 20.11.2011
  • 8 DGSS. Langzeitanwendung von Opioiden bei nicht tumorbedingten Schmerzen (LONTS). Im Internet http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/041-003.html Stand: 01.06.2009; Zugriff: 10.01.2012
  • 9 Unger SI, Baerwald C. Schmerztherapie mit selektiven und nichtselektiven Cyclooxygenaseinhibitoren in der Rheumatologie. Akt Rheumatol 2010; 35: 178-183
  • 10 Januzzi Jr JL. Use of biomarkers to predict cardiac risk from medications: getting to the heart of the matter. Clin Chem 2008; 54: 1107-1109
  • 11 Cannon CP, Curtis SP, FitzGerald GA et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison. Lancet 2006; 368: 1771-1781
  • 12 Blankfield RP. Can natriuretic peptide levels predict the cardiovascular complications of COX-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 178-182
  • 13 Galvani M, Ottani F, Oltrona L et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide on admission has prognostic value across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2004; 110: 128-134
  • 14 Giannitsis E. Rationale for testing the cardiovascular risk for patients with COX-2 inhibitors on the basis of biomarker NT-proBNP. Clin Lab 2005; 51: 63-83
  • 15 Harney SM, Timperley J, Daly C et al. Brain natriuretic peptide is a potentially useful screening tool for the detection of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 136
  • 16 Provan S, Angel K, Semb AG et al. NT-proBNP predicts mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 10-year follow-up of the EURIDISS study. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 1946-1950
  • 17 Solus J, Chung CP, Oeser A et al. Amino-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 2662-2669
  • 18 Kistorp C, Raymond I, Pedersen F et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and urinary albumin levels as predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events in older adults. JAMA 2005; 293: 1609-1616
  • 19 Wong M, Toh L, Wilson A et al. Reduced arterial elasticity in rheumatoid arthritis and the relationship to vascular disease risk factors and inflammation. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 81-89
  • 20 Daniels LB, Maisel AS. Natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 2357-2368
  • 21 Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jesse RL et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2007; 115: e356-e375
  • 22 Nishikimi T, Kuwahara K, Nakao K. Current biochemistry, molecular biology, and clinical relevance of natriuretic peptides. J Cardiol 2011; 57: 131-140
  • 23 Brune K, Furst DE. Combining enzyme specificity and tissue selectivity of cyclooxygenase inhibitors: towards better tolerability?. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 911-919
  • 24 Häupl T, Burmester GR, Giannitsis E et al. N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide: a biomarker for detecting cardiovascular risks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis?. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 838-839
  • 25 Brune K, Katus HA, Moecks J et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations predict the risk of cardiovascular adverse events from antiinflammatory drugs: a pilot trial. Clin Chem 2008; 54: 1149-1157
  • 26 Ruff CT, Morrow DA, Jarolim P et al. Evaluation of NT-proBNP and high sensitivity C-reactive protein for predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with arthritis taking longterm nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 1071-1078
  • 27 Birbara CA, Puopolo AD, Munoz DR et al. Treatment of chronic low back pain with etoricoxib, a new cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor: improvement in pain and disability – a randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-month trial. J Pain 2003; 4: 307-315