Midterm Results of Beating Heart Coronary Bypass Surgery for Non-left Internal Thoracic Artery Anastomosis According to Grafting Design and Implications of Intraoperative Flow Characteristics on Graft Patency

Seung Hyun Lee; Cheol Hyun Chung; Sung Ho Jung; Jae Won Lee; Suk Jung Choo

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1304539

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Table of Contents

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60(07): 438-445
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304539

Original Cardiovascular

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Midterm Results of Beating Heart Coronary Bypass Surgery for Non-left Internal Thoracic Artery Anastomosis According to Grafting Design and Implications of Intraoperative Flow Characteristics on Graft Patency

Authors

Seung Hyun Lee

¹Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, University of Keimyung College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
Cheol Hyun Chung

²Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Sung Ho Jung

²Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Jae Won Lee

²Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Suk Jung Choo

²Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the midterm patency of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery according to the grafting design and intraoperative flow characteristics. Between March 2007 and July 2008, 218 beating heart CABG patients were prospectively divided into two groups according to the non-left internal thoracic artery (LITA) bypass grafting design; Group I (n = 161, aorta–saphenous vein) and Group II (n = 57, LITA-radial artery composite grafting). Preoperative patient characteristics and the additive EuroSCORE were similar between the two groups (p = 0.82). Mean flow (mL/min) and pulsatility index were measured intraoperatively and coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed immediately and 1 year postoperatively. For the non-LITA bypasses, the mean flow was significantly greater in group I than in group II (27.9 ± 17.7 mL/min vs. 17.6 ± 12.6 mL/min, p < 0.001). Uni- and multivariate analysis showed the grafting design (group I) to be the only predictive factor for the favorable midterm patency of the non-LITA grafts (p < 0.001). There were no significant intergroup differences in the incidence of complications including that of stroke or death in the immediate postoperative period. A total of four patients had cerebral events: three in group I (1.87%) and one in group II (1.75%). The overall rates of freedom from graft occlusion for the non-LITA to LAD bypasses at 100, 200, and 300 days were 99, 98, and 89%, respectively, in group I, and 95, 88, and 70%, respectively, in group II (P < 0.01). Overall freedom from graft occlusion for LITA to LAD bypasses showed no significant differences between the two groups (98 vs. 93%, p = 0.053). The results suggest superior intraoperative flow characteristics of the direct aorta-saphenous vein bypass grafting design to be attributable for its favorable patency results.

Keywords

coronary bypass grafting - grafting design - intraoperative flow characteristics

Full Text

References

References
1 Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny J-Y , et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116 (6) 981-989
2 Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA , et al. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (1) 23-29 , discussion 29–30
3 Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (1) 93-101
4 Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah AS, Habib RH. Late results of conventional versus all-arterial revascularization based on internal thoracic and radial artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (1) 19-26 , e2
5 Souza DSR, Johansson B, Bojö L , et al. Harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue for CABG provides long-term graft patency comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: results of a randomized longitudinal trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (2) 373-378
6 Nezić D, Knezevic A, Micovic S, Jovic M. Sequential saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: long-term survival and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (5) 1704-1705 , author reply 1705
7 Kim K-B, Kang CH, Lim C. Prediction of graft flow impairment by intraoperative transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass using arterial grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (2) 594-598
8 Leong DKH, Ashok V, Nishkantha A, Shan YH, Sim EKW. Transit-time flow measurement is essential in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79 (3) 854-857 , discussion 857–858
9 Walpoth BH, Bosshard A, Genyk I , et al. Transit-time flow measurement for detection of early graft failure during myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66 (3) 1097-1100
10 Jung S-H, Song H, Choo SJ , et al. Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site: direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery composite grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138 (1) 76-83
11 Di Giammarco G, Pano M, Cirmeni S, Pelini P, Vitolla G, Di Mauro M. Predictive value of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement for short-term graft patency in coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (3) 468-474
12 Royse AG, Royse CF, Raman JS. Exclusive Y graft operation for multivessel coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (5) 1612-1618
13 Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A , et al. Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127 (1) 179-184
14 Tanaka H, Narisawa T, Mori N , et al. The left internal thoracic artery and radial artery composite graft in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 8 (4) 204-208
15 Lev-Ran O, Braunstein R, Sharony R , et al. No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: the effect on stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129 (2) 307-313
16 Stamou SC, Jablonski KA, Pfister AJ , et al. Stroke after conventional versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (2) 394-399
17 Sakaguchi G, Tadamura E, Ohnaka M, Tambara K, Nishimura K, Komeda M. Composite arterial Y graft has less coronary flow reserve than independent grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (2) 493-496
18 Pevni D, Hertz I, Medalion B , et al. Angiographic evidence for reduced graft patency due to competitive flow in composite arterial T-grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (5) 1220-1225
19 Manabe S, Fukui T, Shimokawa T , et al. Increased graft occlusion or string sign in composite arterial grafting for mildly stenosed target vessels. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (3) 683-687
20 Khot UN, Friedman DT, Ellis SG. Radial-artery coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (9) 941-942 , author reply 941–942
21 Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE. Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (22) 2302-2309
22 Christenson JT, Schmuziger M. Sequential venous bypass grafts: results 10 years later. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63 (2) 371-376
23 Vural KM, Sener E, Taşdemir O. Long-term patency of sequential and individual saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (2) 140-144
24 Farsak B, Tokmakoglu H, Kandemir O , et al. Angiographic assessment of sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg 2003; 18 (6) 524-529 , discussion 530–531