Kardiologie up2date 2012; 8(1): 2-9
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309401
Hotline – Herzinsuffizienz

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Was ist die ideale Position für LV-Sonden zur effektiven kardialen Resynchronisationstherapie (CRT)?

Michael  Günther, Thomas  Rauwolf, Ruth  H.  Strasser
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 March 2012 (online)

Abstract

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) is an effective tool in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) and asynchronous contraction of the left ventricle caused by left bundle branch block. The potency of resynchronisation effect by CRT depends on an ideal position of the left ventricular stimulation lead in a postero-lateral branch of the coronary sinus (CS) or ideal epicardial location. For positioning in suitable locations of the CS lead oblique fluoroscopy projections are useful. The best performance in consideration of CRT effect are achievable with CS lead positioning in the postero-lateral segment (LAO-projection) and basal or middle segment (RAO-projection). Apical positioning of CS lead is associated with lower CRT effect and excess mortality. After implantation of CRT systems the optimisation of AV- and VV-delay can improve CRT-effect and clinical performance of this critical ill patients.

Literatur

  • 1 Vlay S C. The ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: their relevance to the cardiologist, internist and family physician.  J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;  21 234-237
  • 2 The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators . A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  337 1576-1583
  • 3 Dickstein K, Vardas P E, Auricchio A et al. 2010 Focused Update of ESC guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association.  Eur Heart J. 2010;  31 2677-2687
  • 4 Moss A J, Hall W J, Cannom D S et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 1933-1940
  • 5 Moss A J, Zareba W, Hall W J et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 877-883
  • 6 Ypenburg C, Westenberg J J, Bleeker G B et al. Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy – part 1: selection of patients.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;  31 1475-1499
  • 7 Dickstein K, Vardas P E, Auricchio A et al. 2010 Focused Update of ESC guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association.  Eur Heart J. 2010;  31 2677-2687
  • 8 Ypenburg C, Westenberg J J, Bleeker G B et al. Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy--part 1: selection of patients.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;  31 1475-1499
  • 9 Bristow M R, Saxon L A, Boehmer J et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  350 2140-2150
  • 10 Cleland J G, Daubert J C, Erdmann E et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  352 1539-1549
  • 11 Moss A J, Brown M W, Cannom D S et al. Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT): design and clinical protocol.  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005;  10 (Suppl 4) 34-43
  • 12 Dickstein K, Vardas P E, Auricchio A et al. 2010 Focused Update of ESC guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association.  Eur Heart J. 2010;  31 2677-2687
  • 13 Rybak K, Nowak B, Pfeiffer D et al. Kommentar zu den ESC-Leitlinien „Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy“.  Kardiologe. 2008;  6 463-478
  • 14 van Rees J B, de Bie M K, Thijssen J et al. Implantation-related complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 995-1000
  • 15 Chung E S, Leon A R, Tavazzi L et al. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial.  Circulation. 2008;  117 2608-2616
  • 16 Beshai J F, Grimm R. The resynchronization therapy in narrow QRS study (RethinQ study): methods and protocol design.  J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007;  19 149-155
  • 17 Singh J P, Klein H U, Huang D T et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial.  Circulation. 2011;  123 1159-1166
  • 18 Singh J P, Klein H U, Huang D T et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial.  Circulation. 2011;  123 1159-1166
  • 19 Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C et al. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients.  Circulation. 2001;  104 3026-3029
  • 20 Koos R, Sinha A M, Markus K et al. Comparison of left ventricular lead placement via the coronary venous approach versus lateral thoracotomy in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.  Am J Cardiol. 2004;  94 59-63
  • 21 van Rees J B, de Bie M K, Thijssen J et al. Implantation-related complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;  58 995-1000
  • 22 Doll N, Piorkowski C, Czesla M et al. Epicardial versus transvenous left ventricular lead placement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a randomized prospective study.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;  56 256-261
  • 23 Klug D, Balde M, Pavin D et al. Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study.  Circulation. 2007;  116 1349-1355
  • 24 Baddour L M, Epstein A E, Erickson C C et al. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.  Circulation. 2010;  121 458-477
  • 25 Ypenburg C, van D , V , Westenberg J J et al. Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy – Part 2: Follow-up and optimization of settings.  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;  31 1628-1639
  • 26 Prochnau D, Forberg T, Kuhnert H et al. Optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy using a device for non-invasive measurement of cardiac index at rest and during exercise.  Europace. 2011; 
  • 27 Braun M U, Schnabel A, Rauwolf T et al. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.  J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;  13 223-229

Dr. med. Michael Günther

Klinik für Kardiologie
Herzzentrum Dresden
Technische Universität Dresden

Fetscherstraße 76

Email: Michael.Guenther2@mailbox.tu-dresden.de

    >