Synlett 2013; 24(4): 461-464
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1318137
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Extending the Utility of the Bartoli Indolization: Synthesis of Marinoquinolines C and E

Ashley C. Lindsay
School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand   Fax: +64(9)3737422   Email: j.sperry@auckland.ac.nz
,
Jonathan Sperry*
School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand   Fax: +64(9)3737422   Email: j.sperry@auckland.ac.nz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 26 November 2012

Accepted after revision: 08 January 2013

Publication Date:
23 January 2013 (online)


Abstract

A short synthesis of marinoquinolines C and E has been achieved. The synthetic route involves an ipso nitration of an ­electron-deficient boronic acid, the first example of a Bartoli indolization on a nitroquinoline and Suzuki coupling between 2-chloropyrroloquinoline and two separate MIDA boronates.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Sangnoi Y, Sakulkeo O, Yuenyongsawad S, Kanjana-opas A, Ingkaninan K, Plubrukarn A, Suwanborirux K. Mar. Drugs 2008; 6: 578
  • 2 The structure of 1 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography: Kanjana-opas A, Panphon S, Fun H.-K, Chantrapromma S. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 2006; 62: 2728
  • 3 Okanya PW, Mohr KI, Gerth K, Jansen R, Müller R. J. Nat. Prod. 2011; 74: 603
  • 4 Carroll AR, Duffy S, Avery VM. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 8291
  • 5 Li S.-F, Di Y.-T, He H.-P, Zhang Y, Wang Y.-H, Yin J.-L, Tan C.-J, Li S.-L, Hao X.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 3186
  • 6 Synthesis of the parent heterocycle: Govindachari TR, Rajappa S, Sudarsanam V. Tetrahedron 1961; 16: 1
  • 7 Hemetsberger indolization: Molina P, Alajarín M, Sánchez-Andrada P. Synthesis 1993; 225
  • 8 Suzuki coupling–ring closure: Ghosez L, Franc C, Denonne F, Cuisinier C, Touillaux R. Can. J. Chem. 2001; 79: 1827

    • Domino condensation–Heck reaction:
    • 9a Baelen GV, Lemiére GL. F, Dommisse RA, Maes BU. W. ARKIVOC 2009; (xi): 174
    • 9b Van Baelen G, Hostyn S, Dhooghe L, Tapolcsányi P, Mátyus P, Lemiére G, Dommisse R, Kaiser M, Brun R, Cos P, Maes L, Hajós G, Riedl Z, Nagy I, Maes BU. W, Pieters L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009; 17: 7209
  • 10 Ni L, Li Z, Wu F, Xu J, Wu X, Kong L, Yao H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 1271
  • 11 Schwalm CS, Correia CR. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 4836
  • 12 Ma X, Vo Y, Banwell MG, Willis AC. Asian. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 1: 160
  • 13 Mahajan JP, Suryawanshi R, Mhaske SB. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5804
  • 14 Panarese JD, Lindsley CW. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5808
  • 15 Marsais F, Godard A, Queguiner G. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1989; 26: 1589
  • 16 Manna S, Maity S, Rana S, Agasti S, Maiti D. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 1736
  • 17 Salzbrunn S, Simon J, Surya Prakash GK, Petasis NA, Olah GA. Synlett 2000; 1485
  • 18 Surya Prakash GK, Panja C, Mathew T, Surampudi V, Petasis NA, Olag GA. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 2205
  • 19 Yang H, Li Y, Jiang M, Wang J, Fu H. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 5652
  • 20 Wu X.-F, Schranck J, Neumann H, Beller M. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 12462
    • 22a Bartoli G, Palmieri G, Bosco M, Dalpozz R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989; 30: 2129
    • 22b Dalpozzo R, Bartoli G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005; 9: 163
  • 23 Bosco M, Dalpozzo R, Bartoli G, Palmieri G, Petrini M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1991; 657
  • 24 Zhang Z, Yang Z, Meanwell NA, Kadow JF, Wang T. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 2345
    • 25a Gillis EP, Burke MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 6716
    • 25b Knapp DM, Gillis EP, Burke MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 6961
  • 26 General Procedure: Suzuki Coupling A sealed tube charged with toluene (1 mL), THF (1 mL), and deionized H2O (0.3 mL) was degassed with nitrogen for 30 min. Pyrroloquinoline 9 (0.06–1 mmol) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (10 mol%) were added. The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min at r.t. then the appropriate boronic acid MIDA ester (1.5–2 equiv) and Na2CO3 (4.5 equiv) were added. The tube was then sealed under a blanket of nitrogen and stirred for 24 h at reflux. The solution was cooled, H2O was added (10 mL), and the mixture extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude oil by flash chromatography on silica gel eluting with hexanes–EtOAc (4:1) gave the title compound.
  • 27 Marinoquinoline C (3)3,11 According to the general procedure, using pyrroloquinoline 9 (19 mg, 0.094 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (11 mg, 0.009 mmol, 10 mol%), benzyl boronic acid MIDA ester (46 mg, 0.186 mmol), and Na2CO3 (44 mg, 0.415 mmol), the title compound (3 mg, 0.012 mmol, 13%) was obtained as a pale yellow solid, mp 155.4–161.2 °C [lit.11 187–188 °C]. IR: νmax = 3445, 3086, 2917, 1589, 1477, 1363, 1125, 724 cm–1. 1H NMR [400 MHz, (CD3)2CO]: δ = 11.06 (1 H, br s, NH), 8.26–8.22 (1 H, m, CH), 8.08–8.05 (1 H, m, CH), 7.57–7.52 (3 H, m, 3 × CH), 7.44 (2 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 × CH), 7.24 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 7.15 (2 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 × CH), 4.57 (2 H, s, CH2). 13C NMR [100 MHz, (CD3)2CO]: δ = 148.9 (C), 143.7 (C), 139.9 (C), 130.2 (CH), 129.7 (2 × CH), 129.3 (C), 129.2 (2 × CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 124.2 (C), 123.7 (CH), 102.1 (CH), 41.5 (CH2), 1 × C not observed; ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 259 (100) [M + H]+, 213 (28), 181 (42), 113 (11). ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for [C18H14N2 + H]+: 259.1239 [M + H]+; found: 259.1230. Spectroscopic data are consistent with the literature.3,11
  • 28 N-Phenylsulfonyl Marinoquinoline E (12) According to the general procedure using pyrroloquinoline 9 (12 mg, 0.06 mmol), tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (7 mg, 0.006 mmol, 10 mol%), 1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-indolylboronic acid MIDA ester (37 mg, 0.09 mmol), and Na2CO3 (28 mg, 0.27 mmol), the title compound (20 mg, 0.050 mmol, 80%) was obtained as a light brown oil. IR (neat): νmax = 3063, 2852, 2922, 1727, 1602, 1583, 1479, 1444, 1337, 1172, 1128, 1089 cm–1. 1H NMR [400 MHz, (CD3)2CO)]: δ = 11.26 (1 H, br s, NH), 8.67 (1 H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, CH), 8.50 (1 H, s, CH), 8.34–8.32 (1 H, m, CH), 8.15–8.08 (3 H, m, 3 × CH), 7.70–7.66 (2 H, m, 2 × CH), 7.60–7.57 (4 H, m, 4 × CH), 7.46–7.27 (4 H, m, 4 × CH). 13C NMR [100 MHz, (CD3)2CO]: δ = 143.6 (C), 141.5 (C), 138.7 (C), 136.1 (C), 135.4 (CH), 130.9 (C), 130.6 (2 × CH), 130.4 (CH), 130.2 (C), 128.2 (CH), 128.0 (2 × CH), 127.6 (C), 127.1 (CH), 126.7 (CH), 126.6 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 124.8 (CH), 124.6 (CH), 124.1 (C), 123.8 (CH), 121.4 (C), 114.1 (CH), 102.4 (CH). ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 424 (100) [M + H+], 413 (4), 408 (5). ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for [C25H17N3O2 + H]+: 424.1115 [M + H]+; found: 424.1114.
  • 29 Marinoquinoline E (5)3,11 A solution of N-(phenylsulfonyl marinoquinoline E (12, 10 mg, 0.02 mmol) and K2CO3 (39 mg, 0.3 mmol) in MeOH (1.5 mL) and H2O (0.5 mL) was heated to reflux for 3 h. The solution was cooled, H2O was added (5 mL), and the mixture extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The organic extracts were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude oil by flash chromatography on silica gel eluting with EtOAc gave the title compound (3 mg. 0.01 mmol, 45%) as a colorless solid; mp 258.7–263.5 °C [lit.11 264–266 °C]. IR (neat): νmax = 3450, 3418, 2900, 1735, 1558, 1494 cm–1. 1H NMR [400 MHz, (CD3)2CO]: δ = 10.95 (1 H, br s, NH), 10.79 (1 H, br s, NH), 8.77 (1 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH), 8.27 (2 H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 × CH), 8.17 (1 H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, CH), 7.61–7.49 (4 H, m, 4 × CH), 7.27–7.19 (3 H, m, 3 × CH). 13C NMR [100 MHz, (CD3)2CO]: δ = 144.5 (C), 144.1 (C), 138.0 (C), 130.1 (CH), 129.5 (C), 128.1 (C), 127.8 (C), 127.3 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 125.4 (CH), 123.7 (CH), 123.6 (CH), 123.3 (CH), 121.0 (CH), 115.3 (C), 112.2 (CH), 102.2 (CH), 1 × C not observed. ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 284 (100) [M + H+], 214 (2), 127 (5). ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for [C19H13N3 + H]+: 284.1187 [M + H]+; found: 284.1182. Spectroscopic data are consistent with the literature.3,11