J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73(05): 308-315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1321507
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring of the Facial Nerve during Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection

Maura K. Cosetti
1   Departments of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Ming Xu
2   Departments of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Andrew Rivera
1   Departments of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Daniel Jethanamest
1   Departments of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Maggie A. Kuhn
1   Departments of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Aleksandar Beric
2   Departments of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
3   Departments of Neurology and Orthopedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
John G. Golfinos
2   Departments of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
J. Thomas Roland
1   Departments of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
2   Departments of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 September 2011

28 March 2012

Publication Date:
30 July 2012 (online)

Abstract

Objective To determine whether transcranial motor-evoked potential (TCMEP) monitoring of the facial nerve (FN) during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection can predict both immediate and long-term postoperative FN function.

Design Retrospective review.

Setting Tertiary referral center.

Main Outcome Measures DeltaTCMEP (final-initial) and immediate and long-term facial nerve function using House Brackmann (HB) rating scale.

Results Intraoperative TCMEP data and immediate and follow-up FN outcome are reported for 52 patients undergoing CPA tumor resection. Patients with unsatisfactory facial outcome (HB >2) at follow-up had an average deltaTCMEP of 57 V, whereas those with HB I or II had a mean deltaTCMEP of 0.04 V (t = -2.6, p < 0.05.) Intraoperative deltaTCMEP did not differ significantly between groups with satisfactory (HB I, II) and unsatisfactory (HB > 2) facial function in the immediate postoperative period.

Conclusion Intraoperative TCMEP of the facial nerve can be a valuable adjunct to conventional facial nerve electromyography during resection of tumors at the CPA. Intraoperative deltaTCMEP >57 V may be worrisome for long-term recovery of satisfactory facial nerve function.

 
  • References

  • 1 Prass RL, Lüders H. Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring: Part 1. Evoked electromyographic activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurosurgery 1986; 19: 392-400
  • 2 Harner SG, Daube JR, Ebersold MJ, Beatty CW. Improved preservation of facial nerve function with use of electrical monitoring during removal of acoustic neuromas. Mayo Clin Proc 1987; 62: 92-102
  • 3 Niparko JK, Kileny PR, Kemink JL, Lee HM, Graham MD. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring: II. Facial nerve function. Am J Otol 1989; 10: 55-61
  • 4 Hammerschlag PE, Cohen NL. Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function in cerebellopontine angle surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103 (5 (Pt 1)) 681-684
  • 5 Silverstein H, Rosenberg SI, Flanzer J, Seidman MD. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol 1993; 14: 524-532
  • 6 Romstöck J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 586-593
  • 7 Prell J, Rampp S, Romstöck J, Fahlbusch R, Strauss C. Train time as a quantitative electromyographic parameter for facial nerve function in patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2007; 106: 826-832
  • 8 Prell J, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Rampp S. A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 1064-1073 , discussion 1073
  • 9 Lin VY, Houlden D, Bethune A , et al. A novel method in predicting immediate postoperative facial nerve function post acoustic neuroma excision. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 1017-1022
  • 10 Zeitouni AG, Hammerschlag PE, Cohen NL. Prognostic significance of intraoperative facial nerve stimulus thresholds. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 494-497
  • 11 Nissen AJ, Sikand A, Curto FS, Welsh JE, Gardi J. Value of intraoperative threshold stimulus in predicting postoperative facial nerve function after acoustic tumor resection. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 249-251
  • 12 Isaacson B, Kileny PR, El-Kashlan H, Gadre AK. Intraoperative monitoring and facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 812-817
  • 13 Selesnick SH, Carew JF, Victor JD, Heise CW, Levine J. Predictive value of facial nerve electrophysiologic stimulation thresholds in cerebellopontine-angle surgery. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (5 Pt 1) 633-638
  • 14 Neff BA, Ting J, Dickinson SL, Welling DB. Facial nerve monitoring parameters as a predictor of postoperative facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 728-732
  • 15 Bernat I, Grayeli AB, Esquia G, Zhang Z, Kalamarides M, Sterkers O. Intraoperative electromyography and surgical observations as predictive factors of facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 306-312
  • 16 Sala F, Manganotti P, Tramontano V, Bricolo A, Gerosa M. Monitoring of motor pathways during brain stem surgery: what we have achieved and what we still miss?. Neurophysiol Clin 2007; 37: 399-406
  • 17 Chen X, Sterio D, Ming X , et al. Success rate of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: effects of age, lesion location, and preoperative neurologic deficits. J Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 24: 281-285
  • 18 Jones SJ, Harrison R, Koh KF, Mendoza N, Crockard HA. Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 100: 375-383
  • 19 Szelényi A, Kothbauer KF, Deletis V. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 1586-1595
  • 20 Akagami R, Dong CC, Westerberg BD. Localized transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials for monitoring cranial nerves in cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl) 78-85 , discussion 78–85
  • 21 Dong CC, Macdonald DB, Akagami R , et al. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 588-596
  • 22 Acioly MA, Liebsch M, Carvalho CH, Gharabaghi A, Tatagiba M. Transcranial electrocortical stimulation to monitor the facial nerve motor function during cerebellopontine angle surgery. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative) 354-361 , discussion 362
  • 23 Fukuda M, Oishi M, Hiraishi T, Fujii Y. Facial nerve motor-evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 519-523
  • 24 Fukuda M, Oishi M, Takao T, Saito A, Fujii Y. Facial nerve motor-evoked potential monitoring during skull base surgery predicts facial nerve outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 1066-1070
  • 25 Liu BY, Tian YJ, Liu W , et al. Intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation for preservation of facial nerve function in patients with large acoustic neuroma. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007; 120: 323-325
  • 26 Wilkinson MF, Kaufmann AM. Monitoring of facial muscle motor evoked potentials during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: evidence of changes in motor neuron excitability. J Neurosurg 2005; 103: 64-69
  • 27 Sekhar LN, Swamy NK, Jaiswal V, Rubinstein E, Hirsch Jr WE, Wright DC. Surgical excision of meningiomas involving the clivus: preoperative and intraoperative features as predictors of postoperative functional deterioration. J Neurosurg 1994; 81: 860-868
  • 28 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 146-147
  • 29 Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2005; 17: 13-19
  • 30 Esquia-Medina GN, Grayeli AB, Ferrary E , et al. Do facial nerve displacement pattern and tumor adhesion influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery?. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 392-397
  • 31 Luetje CM, Whittaker CK, Callaway LA, Veraga G. Histological acoustic tumor involvement of the VIIth nerve and multicentric origin in the VIIIth nerve. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1133-1139
  • 32 McElveen Jr JT, Belmonte RG, Fukushima T, Bullard DE. A review of facial nerve outcome in 100 consecutive cases of acoustic tumor surgery. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (10 Pt 1) 1667-1672
  • 33 Zaouche S, Ionescu E, Dubreuil C, Ferber-Viart C. Pre- and intraoperative predictive factors of facial palsy in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 363-369