Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis

Background and study aim: Placement of covered self-expanding metal or plastic stents (SEMS or SEPS) is an established method for managing intrathoracic leaks. Recently, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) has been described as a new effective treatment option. Our aim was to compare stent placement with EVAC for nonsurgical closure of intrathoracic anastomotic leaks.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective analysis we were able to identify 39 patients who were treated with SEMS or SEPS and 32 patients who were treated with EVAC for intrathoracic leakage. In addition to successful fistula closure, we analyzed hospital mortality, number of endoscopic interventions, incidence of stenoses, and duration of hospitalization.

Results: In a multivariate analysis, successful wound closure was independently associated with EVAC therapy (hazard ratio 2.997, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.568 – 5.729; P = 0.001). The overall closure rate was significantly higher in the EVAC group (84.4 %) compared with the SEMS/SEPS group (53.8 %). No difference was found for hospitalization and hospital mortality. We found significantly more strictures in the stent group (28.2 % vs. 9.4 % with EVAC, P < 0,05).

Conclusions: EVAC is an effective endoscopic treatment option for intrathoracic leaks and showed higher effectiveness than stent placement in our cohort.

• References

• 1 Lee Y, Fujita H, Yamana H et al. Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosis. Surg Today 1994; 24: 24-29
• 2 Faller J. Surgery for esophageal and cardia cancer in Hungary: a nationwide retrospective five-year survey. Surg Today 1996; 26: 368-372
• 3 Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C et al. Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000; 26: 168-171
• 4 Miller JD, Jain MK, de Gara CJ et al. Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1997; 65: 20-21
• 5 Ikeguchi M, Oka S, Gomyo Y et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 1517-1520
• 6 Roy-Choudhury SH, Nicholson AA, Wedgwood KR et al. Symptomatic malignant gastroesophageal anastomotic leak: management with covered metallic esophageal stents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 161-165
• 7 Doniec JM, Schniewind B, Kahlke V et al. Therapy of anastomotic leaks by means of covered self-expanding metallic stents after esophagogastrectomy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 652-658
• 8 Gelbmann CM, Ratiu NL, Rath HC et al. Use of self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and symptomatic anastomotic leaks. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 695-699
• 9 Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Moesta KT et al. Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 801-807
• 10 Langer FB, Wenzl E, Prager G et al. Management of postoperative esophageal leaks with the Polyflex self-expanding covered plastic stent. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 398-403
• 11 Radecke K, Gerken G, Treichel U. Impact of a self-expanding, plastic esophageal stent on various esophageal stenoses, fistulas, and leakages: a single-center experience in 39 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 812-818
• 12 Schubert D, Scheidbach H, Kuhn R et al. Endoscopic treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by using silicone-covered, self-expanding polyester stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 891-896
• 13 Kauer WK, Stein HJ, Dittler HJ et al. Stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 50-53
• 14 Tuebergen D, Rijcken E, Mennigen R et al. Treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and esophageal perforations with endoluminal stents: efficacy and current limitations. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1168-1176
• 15 Wedemeyer J, Schneider A, Manns MP et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 708-711
• 16 Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S et al. Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 382-386
• 17 Loske G, Schorsch T, Muller C. Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 540-544
• 18 Ahrens M, Schulte T, Egberts J et al. Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 693-698
• 19 Vikatmaa P, Juutilainen V, Kuukasjarvi P et al. Negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 438-448
• 20 Thompson JT, Marks MW. Negative pressure wound therapy. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34: 673-684
• 21 Holle G, Riedel K, von Gregory H et al. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy: Current status and basic research. Unfallchirurg 2007; 4: 289-300
• 22 Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1818-1825