Download PDF
Homœopathic Links 2013; 26(1): 40-46
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327884
PHILOSOPHY AND DISCUSSION
Sonntag Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG Stuttgart · New York

Network Approach to Semiology

Jorge Biolchini , Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 March 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Dealing with quantity and diversity of symptoms, while searching to capture the essence of a remedy, seem to be divergent aims, somewhat difficult to reconcile. The atomistic viewpoint of symptom study is limited, both in the health field in general and in homeopathy in particular, and can be challenged to expand our understanding perspective. The present work explores the subject through a multidimensional approach, including its componential, vectorial, and informational aspects. Ontologically defined as an open network of semiotic connections, the homeopathic symptom is explored through its multilevel structure. Three fundamental levels are presented, defined, and explained, as well as corresponding examples are given for each one. Network aspects of levels are discussed and diagrammatically represented, showing some of their organizational properties. A new approach to studying remedies is proposed, based on the semantic network of the repertory. Making it possible to visualize relevant links among symptoms, the method allows characterizing specific expressions of a remedy, while showing how they are related among themselves. It also makes it possible to identify and graphically demonstrate attractor properties of symptom fields in vital space.

Key words

Symptom - Remedy picture - Network - Repertory - Remedy essence - Semiology
 

  • References

  • 1 Biolchini J. Une Approche Linguistique de la Sémiologie Homéopathique. LʼHoméopathie Européenne. Paris: Groupe Méditions, v. 4, n. 4; 1996: 26-31
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Biolchini J. Semantics and Cognition in Knowledge Bases: From Controlled Vocabulary to Ontology. Rio de Janeiro: DataGramaZero – Revista de Ciência da Informação, v.2, n.5; 2001
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Biolchini J. From Knowledge Organization to Intelligence: Ontology Development to Support Medical Decision. Doctoral Thesis Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Castro JB. Logic of Repertories. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Cruse DA. Lexical Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Davies P, Gregersen NH. Information and the Nature of Reality – From Physics to Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Durso FT, Nickerson RS, Dumais ST, Lewandowsky S, Perfect TJ. Handbook of Applied Cognition. Chichester: Wiley; 2007
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Evans DA, Patel V. Cognitive Science in Medicine: Biomedical Modeling. Boston: The MIT Press; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Gärdenfors P. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Margolis E, Laurence S. Concepts – Core Readings. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Newman M. Networks: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Peirce CS. The Essential Peirce, Volume 2: Selected Philosophical Writings. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Robbins P, Aydede M. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Sowa JF. Knowledge Representation – Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Perspectives. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 2000
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thinkmap, Inc.. Visual Thesaurus. www.thinkmap.com New York: 2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 van Zandvoort R, van Grinsven E. Complete Repertory 2012/Complete Dynamics. Version 12.7. Den Haag: 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar