Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2013; 122(01/02): 8-15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1337897
Wissenschaft
Parodontologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Zur antimikrobiellen Wirkung von Mundspüllösungen

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Mouth Rinses
S Kneist
,
K Gebelein
,
H Küpper
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 February 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Einer antimikrobiellen Wirkung von 119 Mundspüllösungen (MSPL) auf Mikroorganismen des supra- und subgingivalen Biofilms (Aktinomyzeten, Streptokokken, Laktobazillen, Parodontopathogene, S. aureus, E. faecalis und C. albicans) wurde in vitro mit dem Agar-Hemmhoftest nachgegangen. Die MSPL enthielten Chlorhexidin (CHX, n = 31), Cetylpyridiniumchlorid (CPC, n = 34), Fluorid (F–, n = 30) oder „andere“ Ingredienzien (n=25). Physiologische NaCl-Lösung und 1 %iges CHX dienten als Kontrollen. Die Keime wurden in der nachfolgenden Rangfolge durch CHX (Hemmhofdurchmesser in mm = HHD: 29,5–16,4), CPC (HHD: 19,2–11,7), F– (HHD: 17,1–11,7) und „andere Ingredienzien” (HHD: 17,7–12,5) im Wachstum inhibiert. Die Ergebnisse wurden vergleichbaren Untersuchungen aus dem Schrifttum gegenübergestellt und untermauern, dass MSPL mit CHX im Vergleich zu den übrigen zu den am stärksten ausgeprägten Hemmhofzonen im Bakterien- bzw. Pilzrasen führen.

The antimicrobial efficacy of 119 mouthrinses on the synergistic reduction of supra- and subgingival microorganisms (actinomyces, streptococci, lactobacilli, periopathogens, S. aureus, E. faecalis and C. albicans) was determined in vitro. The agar diffusion assay was performed. The mouth rinses contained Chlorhexidine (CHX, n = 31), Cetylpyridiniumchloride (CPC, n = 34), Fluoride (F–, n = 30) or „other“ ingredients (n = 25). NaCl and CHX (1 %) served as controls. In general, the microbes were inhibited in the following order by CHX (diameter of inhibition zones in mm = DIZ: 29.5–16.4), CPC (DIZ: 19.2–11.7), F (DIZ: 17.1–11.7), and by „other ingredients“ (IZ: 17.7–12.5). In concordance with results of other authors mouth rinses with CHX produced significantly larger inhibition zones in comparison with other mouth rinses.

Schlüsselwörter

In-vitro-Studie - Mundspüllösungen - antimikrobielle Wirkung - sensibles Keimspektrum

Key words

In vitro study - Mouth Rinses - Antimicrobial Efficacy - Susceptibility among Germs
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Afennich F, Slot DE, Hossainian N et al. The effect of hexetidine mouthwash on the prevention of plaque and gingival inflammation: a systemic review. Int J Dent Hygiene 2011; 9: 182-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arweiler NB, Netuschil L, Reich E. Alcohol-free mouthrinse solutions to reduce supragingival plaque regrowth and vitality. A controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 168-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Arweiler N, Mombelli A, Welk A et al. 40 Jahre Chlorhexidin in der klinischen Forschung – Ist Chlorhexidin auch heute noch der Goldstandard?. ZWR 2011; 120: 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Auschill TM, Hein N, Hellwig E et al. Effect of two antimicrobial agents on early in situ biofilm formation. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 147-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Barkvoll P, Rølla G, Svendsen AK. Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium lauryl sulfate in vivo. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16: 593-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bernimoulin JP, Deschner J. Antimikrobielle Lösungen in der Parodontologie. Parodontologie 1995; 3: 173-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bonesvoll P, Lökken P, Rölla G. Influence of concentration, time, temperature and pH on the retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity after mouth rinses. Arch Oral Biol 1974; 19: 1025-1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bonesvoll P, Lökken P, Rölla G et al. Retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity after mouth rinses. Arch Oral Biol 1974; 19: 209-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brecx M, Netuschil L, Hoffmann T. How to select the right mouthrinses in periodontal prevention and therapy. Part II. Clinical use and recommendations. Int J Dent Hyg 2003; 1: 188-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Clarkson J, Hardwick K, Barmes D et al. International collaborative research on fluoride. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 893-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cummins D, Watson GK. Computer model relating chemistry to biological activity of metal anti-plaque agents. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1702-1705
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Decker EM, von Ohle C, Weiger R et al. A synergistic chlorhexidine/chitosan combination for improved antiplaque strategies. J Periodontol Res 2005; 40: 373-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fine DH, Furgang D, Barnett ML. Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 697-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gebelein K. In-vitro-Studie zur antimikrobiellen Wirkung von Mundspüllösungen im Agar-Hemmhoftest. [Dissertation] Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Gehring F. Wirkung von Aminfluorid und Natriumfluorid auf Keime der Plaqueflora. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1983; 38: 36-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gjermo P, Bastaad KL, Rölla G. The plaque-inhibiting capacity of 11 antibacterial compounds. J Periodont Res 1970; 5: 102-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grytten J, Tollefsen T, Afseth J. The effect of a combination of copper and hexetidine on plaque formation and the amount of copper retained by dental plaque bacteria. Acta Odontol Scand 1987; 45: 429-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gülzow HJ, Hellwig E, Hetzer G. Stellungnahme der DGZMK. Empfehlungen zur Kariesprophylaxe mit Fluoriden. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2000; 55: 383-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Haffajee AD, Yaskell T, Socransky SS. Antimicrobial effectiveness of an herbal mouthrinse compared with an essential oil and a chlorhexidine mouthrinse. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 606-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Haps S, Slot DE, Berchier CE et al. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouth rinses as adjuncts to toothbrushing on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation; a systemic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2008; 6: 290-303
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Hepsø HU, Bjørnland T, Skoglund LA. Side-effects and patient acceptance of 0,2 % versus 0,1 % chlorhexidine used as post-operative prophylactic mouthwash. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 17-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Herrera D, Roldán S, Santacruz I et al. Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0,12 % chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary counts study. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kneist S. Chlorhexidin in der zahnärztlichen Praxis – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. ZMK 2006; 11: 720-730
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kneist S, Sieckmann C, Küpper H. Zur antimikrobiellen Wirkung von NaF-haltigen Zahnpasten. ZWR 2012; 121: 78-88
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Melzig M, Teuscher E. Untersuchung zum Einfluss ätherischer Öle und ihrer Hauptkomponenten auf die Adenosinaufnahme kultivierter Endothelzellen. Planta Med 1989; 57: 41-42
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Miller DW. Die Mikroorganismen der Mundhöhle. Leipzig: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1892
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Moermann JE, Mühlemann HR. Synergistic inhibitory effect of zinc and hexetidine on in vitro growth and acid production of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 135-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Øgaard B, Rølla G, Ruben J et al. Relative cariostatic effects of KOH-soluble and KOH-insoluble fluoride in situ. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1505-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Otten MPT, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC et al. Retention of antimicrobial activity in plaque and saliva following mouthrinse. Use in vivo. Caries Res 2010; 44: 459-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pan PH, Finnegan MB, Sturdivant L et al. Comparative antimicrobial activity of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 474-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Pan PC, Harper S, Ricci-Nittel D et al. In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent 2010; 38: 16-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Roberts WR, Addy M. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride and hexetidine. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8: 295-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Scheie AA, Petersen FC. Antimicrobials in caries control. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E, Hrsg. Dental caries. The disease and its clinical management. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008: 265-277
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Schröder FW. Anwendung von Chlorhexidin-Spüllösungen. Inaktivierung des Chlorhexidins durch anionische Netzmittel in Mundpflegemitteln. Oralprophylaxe 2000; 22: 203-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Steinberg D, Heling I, Daniel I et al. Antibacterial synergistic effect of chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxid against Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. J Oral Reh 1999; 26: 151-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Waaler SM. Further in vivo studies on the plaque-inhibiting effect of chlorhexidine and its binding mechanism. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 422-427
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Wåler SM. The effect of some metal ions on volatile sulphur-containing compounds originating from the oral cavity. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 261-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wile DB, Dinsdale JRM, Joynson DHM. Hexetidine (,Oraldene'): a report on its antibacterial and antifungal properties on the oral flora in healthy subjects. Curr Med Res Opin 1986; 10: 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Young A, Jonski G, Rölla G et al. Effects of metal salts on the oral production of volatile sulfur-containing compounds (VSC). J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 776-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar