Key words
alkylation - antitumor agents - heterocycles - lactams - Michael addition - olefination
Carbo- and heterocycles containing an exo-methylidene moiety conjugated with a carbonyl
group constitute a large class of natural and synthetic compounds which display a
broad spectrum of biological properties, ranging from cytotoxic/anticancer, allergenic,
anti-inflammatory, and cardiovascular to antibacterial, antifungal, and phytotoxic
activities. These classes of compounds include α-methylidenecyclopentanones 1,[1] and α-alkylidene-γ- and δ-lactones 2 and 3 as well as α-alkylidene-γ- and δ-lactams 4 and 5 (Figure [1])[2] It is believed that the Michael acceptor functionality, which is present in all
these compounds, can effectively react with various bionucleophiles and therefore
is crucial for their biological activities.[3]
Figure 1
In a search for new, biologically promising analogues we have developed syntheses
of several classes of α-alkylidene-γ- and δ-lactones, as well as α-methylidene-γ-lactams,
by applying a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons approach to the construction of the exo-alkylidene
bond.[2b]
[4] Many of the compounds obtained in our laboratory turned out to be highly potent
against several cancer cell lines as well as against nosocomial and community-associated
staphylococci (MRSA) which are resistant to most or all available therapeutic classes
of antimicrobial drugs.[5] Recently, we envisaged that introduction of an additional heteroatom to the lactone
or lactam ring might be beneficial for biological activity. Consequently, a series
of 4-methylideneisoxazolidin-5-ones 6 (Figure [2]) containing an additional nitrogen atom in the lactone ring, has been synthesized
in our laboratory and, to our satisfaction, certain isoxazolidinones 6 proved to be very potent against HL-60, NALM-6, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells.[6] The most active compounds have been subjected to extended biological studies which
have shed light on their mode of action at the molecular level.[7]
Figure 2
Encouraged by these results we decided to develop the synthesis of, so far unknown,
4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 7 which have an additional nitrogen atom in the lactam ring. Although it is well established
that α-alkylidene-γ-lactams usually display lower cytotoxic activity than α-alkylidene-γ-lactones,[5a]
[b]
[c] on the other hand, these species are considered as particularly promising because
the γ-lactam moiety can help to mitigate the biological toxicity often observed for
γ-lactones.[8] Therefore, synthesis of α-methylidene-γ-lactams with potentially enhanced cytotoxicity
profile seemed an attractive goal. In this paper we describe our preliminary results
concerning a convenient and versatile Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons approach to variously
substituted 4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 7.
Synthesis of 2-aryl-1-methyl-4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 14a–e substituted with various aryl groups in position 2 was accomplished as shown in Scheme
[1]. 1-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols 11a–e were prepared by adapting the literature procedure described for the corresponding
4-dimethoxyphosphorylpyrazol-5-ols.[9] The sodium salt of ethyl 2-diethoxyphosphoryl-3-hydroxy-2-propenoate 8 was treated with arylhydrazine hydrochlorides 9a–e followed by addition of potassium carbonate (Table [1]). This one-pot, two-step reaction obviously proceeds via an addition–elimination
sequence to give substitution products 10a–e followed by intramolecular cyclization. Pyrazoles 11a–e obtained in this fashion were next N-methylated with dimethyl sulfate to give 2-aryl-1-methyl-4-diethoxyphosphorylpyrazol-3-ones
12a–e in satisfactory yields (Table [1]).[10] Unfortunately, all attempts to introduce various substituents into position 5 of
the pyrazolone ring, by executing Michael addition of Grignard reagents to 12, failed. Therefore, we decided to perform the reduction of the double bond in pyrazolones
12 to provide access to Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reagents 13. Standard hydrogenation of 12a in the presence of palladium or platinum catalysts gave only starting material. However,
application of L-Selectride as a reducing agent furnished the expected pyrazolidinones 13a–e in good yields (Table [1]).[11] Finally, reaction of 13a–e with paraformaldehyde in the presence of sodium hydride gave the targeted 4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones
14a–e in good to excellent yields (Table [1]).[12]
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (a) H2O, reflux, 10 min; (b) K2CO3 (1.1 equiv), H2O, reflux, 10 min; (c) Me2SO4 (1.2 equiv), DCE, 80 °C, 18 h; (d) L-Selectride (1.25 equiv), THF, –78 °C, 1 h, then r.t., 18 h; (e) (CH2O)n (5 equiv), NaH (1.2 equiv), THF, r.t., 2 h.
Table 1 Preparation of 1-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols 11a–e, 2-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1-methyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-ones 12a–e, 2-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1-methylpyrazolidin-3-ones 13a–e, and 2-Aryl-1-methyl-4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 14a–e
|
Entry
|
Compd
|
Ar
|
Yield of 11 (%)a
|
Yield of 12 (%)a
|
Yield of 13 (%)a
|
Yield of 14 (%)a
|
|
1
|
a
|
Ph
|
79
|
54
|
86
|
91
|
|
2
|
b
|
2-MeC6H4
|
86
|
72
|
77
|
68
|
|
3
|
c
|
4-MeC6H4
|
87
|
67
|
82
|
68
|
|
4
|
d
|
4-ClC6H4
|
85
|
46
|
80
|
84
|
|
5
|
e
|
4-BrC6H4
|
81
|
63
|
79
|
61
|
a Yield of purified, isolated products based on 8, 11, 12, or 13, respectively.
Scheme 2
Reagents and conditions: (a) 1. H2NNHAr·HCl, H2O, reflux, 2 h; 2. K2CO3 (2 equiv), reflux, 2 h, then r.t., 18 h; (b) H2NNHPh, AcOH (2 equiv), H2O, reflux, 3 h; (c) CF3SO3Me (2 equiv), DCE, 80 °C, 2 h; (d) L-Selectride (1.25 equiv), THF, –78 °C, 1 h, then
r.t., 18 h; (e) (CH2O)n (5 equiv), NaH (1.2 equiv), THF, r.t., 2 h.
To gain access to 5-substituted 2-aryl-1-methyl-4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 19a–g we decided to prepare substituted 1-aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols 16a–g from various ethyl 2-acyl-2-diethoxyphosphorylacetates 15a–g and arylhydrazine hydrochlorides by applying a modified literature procedure[13] (Scheme [2], procedure a). This procedure worked well for alkyl-substituted acetates 15a–e (R = Alk) but aryl-substituted acetates 15f,g (R = Ar) gave low yield of the expected pyrazoles. Pleasingly, heating aryl-substituted
acetates 15f,g and phenylhydrazine with acetic acid in water (procedure b) furnished 1,3-diarylpyrazolols
16f,g in good yields (Table [2]).[14] N-Methylation of pyrazolols 16a–g
[10] using methyl triflate followed by reduction of 2-aryl-1-methylpyrazol-3-ones 17a–g
[11] with L-Selectride gave Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reagents 18a–g, which were obtained as single isomers or mixtures of trans and cis diastereoisomers in the ratio shown in Table [2]. Due to highly basic conditions employed during the reduction one could expect thermodynamic
control within the reaction and the preferential formation of the trans isomers. Unfortunately, resonances for the H-4 and H-5 protons in the 1H NMR spectra of pyrazolidiones 18 were not sufficiently resolved to determine J
H4–H5 coupling constants and to confirm the assumed trans configuration of these compounds. In view of the planned transformation of pyrazolidinones
18 into methylidenepyrazolidinones 19 no efforts were undertaken to separate the diastereoisomers. In the final step, pyrazolidinones
18a–g were used for the olefination with formaldehyde to provide final 5-substituted pyrazolidinones
19a–g in good yields (Table [2]).[12]
Table 2 Preparation of 1-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols 16a–g, 2-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1-methylpyrazol-3-ones 17a–g
, 2-Aryl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1-methypyrazolidin-3-ones 18a–g, and 2-Aryl-1-methyl-4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones 19a–g
|
Entry
|
Compd
|
R
|
Ar
|
Yield of 16
(%)a
|
Yield of 17 (%)a
|
Yield of 18
(%)a (trans/cis ratio)
|
Yield of 19 (%)a
|
|
1
|
a
|
Me
|
Ph
|
86
|
61
|
75 (85:15)
|
72
|
|
2
|
b
|
Et
|
Ph
|
64
|
60
|
75 (90:10)
|
61
|
|
3
|
c
|
i-Pr
|
Ph
|
41
|
51
|
41 (65:35)
|
70
|
|
4
|
d
|
n-Bu
|
Ph
|
72
|
57
|
88 (90:10)
|
58
|
|
5
|
e
|
Et
|
3-ClC6H4
|
72
|
75
|
70 (90:10)
|
79
|
|
6
|
f
|
Ph
|
Ph
|
75
|
65
|
84 (100:0)
|
63
|
|
7
|
g
|
4-MeOC6H4
|
Ph
|
72
|
61
|
51 (100:0)
|
85
|
a Yield of purified, isolated products based on 15, 16, 17, or 18, respectively.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (a) toluene, reflux, 80 h; (b) RMgX (1.2 equiv), THF, reflux, 2 h; (c) NaH (1.2
equiv), (CH2O)n (5 equiv), THF, r.t., 2 h.
Having accomplished the synthesis of 3-methylidene-1-methyl-2-arylpyrazolidin-3-ones
14a–e and 19a–g we turned our attention to the reaction of the sodium salt of 3-hydroxy-2-propenoate
8 with disubstituted hydrazines. To our disappointment the reaction of 8 with 1,2-diphenylhydrazine hydrochloride did not occur. Pleasingly, replacement of
8 by 3-methoxy-2-diethoxyphosphoryl-acrylate (20)[15] proved to be successful. When acrylate 20 and 1,2-diphenylhydrazine (21) were heated in refluxing toluene for 80 hours the expected 4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1,2-diphenyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one (22) was obtained in 83% yield (Scheme [3]). In the next step we examined the addition of Grignard reagents to pyrazolone 22. Unfortunately, all attempts to perform the addition of methylmagnesium chloride
to 22 under standard conditions (0 °C to r.t., THF or Et2O as solvent, addition of CuI) failed. However, performing this reaction in boiling
THF for two hours with 1.2 equivalents of MeMgCl gave, after purification by column
chromatography, the expected 5-methyl-4-diethoxyphosphoryl-1,2-diphenylpyrazolidin-3-one
(23a) in a reasonable 52% yield. Applying these optimized conditions we performed the
reaction of several Grignard reagents with pyrazolone 22 and obtained the expected adducts 23b–e, usually as mixtures of trans and cis isomers (Table [3]).[16] Contrary to pyrazolidinones 18, in the 1H NMR spectra of 23 all signals were resolved and J
H4–H5 coupling constants could be easily determined. For example, for the major and minor
diastereoisomer of 23a J
H4–H5 coupling constants were 2.8 Hz and 6.7 Hz, respectively, confirming the trans configuration of the latter if pseudoaxial positions of phosphoryl and methyl groups
are assumed. To unequivocally confirm the trans configuration of the major isomer of pyrazolidinone 23a, a NOE experiment was performed, showing 13% enhancement in the signal of the H-4
proton when protons of the methyl group in position 5 were irradiated. Because of
similar coupling constant patterns in all major isomers of pyrazolidinones 23a–e, we construe that all major isomers have the trans configuration. Phosphorylated pyrazolidinones 23a–e were next used as Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reagents for the olefination with formaldehyde
to furnish the targeted 4-methylidene-1,2-diphenylpyrazolidin-3-ones 24a–e in excellent yields (Table [3]).[12]
Table 3 Synthesis of 4-Diethoxyphosphoryl-1,2-diphenylpyrazolidin-3-ones 23a–e and 4-Methylidene-1,2-diphenylpyrazolidin-3-ones 24a–e
|
Entry
|
Compd
|
RMgX
|
Yield of 23
(%)a (trans/cis ratio)
|
Yield of 24
(%)a
|
|
1
|
a
|
MeMgCl
|
52 (85:15)
|
87
|
|
2
|
b
|
EtMgCl
|
42 (90:10)
|
92
|
|
3
|
c
|
n-BuMgCl
|
56 (95:5)
|
92
|
|
4
|
d
|
vinylMgBr
|
83 (90:10)
|
85
|
|
5
|
e
|
PhMgBr
|
35 (100:0)
|
89
|
a Yield of purified, isolated product based on 22 or 23, respectively.
In summary, as a part of an ongoing program in our laboratory focused on the application
of Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons approaches in the synthesis of biologically important 2-alkylidene-1-oxoheterocyles,
we have developed a simple, effective, and general methodology for the synthesis of
novel 4-methylidenepyrazolidin-3-ones. As disclosed, three complementary methods enable
the introduction of various alkyl or aryl substituents at positions 1, 2, and/or 5
on the pyrazolidinone ring and open access to a new class of α-alkylidene-γ-lactams
with potential cytotoxic activity. Further studies to extend the presented methodology
and to test the obtained compounds for their cytotoxic activity are under way.