Synlett 2014; 25(6): 871-875
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1340835
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Safe Generation and Direct Use of Diazoesters in Flow Chemistry

Simon T. R. Müller
a   Cardiff University, School of Chemistry, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK   Fax: +44(29)20876968   Email: wirth@cf.ac.uk
,
Daniel Smith
a   Cardiff University, School of Chemistry, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK   Fax: +44(29)20876968   Email: wirth@cf.ac.uk
,
Paul Hellier
b   Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 81603 Gaillac, France
,
Thomas Wirth*
a   Cardiff University, School of Chemistry, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK   Fax: +44(29)20876968   Email: wirth@cf.ac.uk
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 13 December 2013

Accepted after revision: 27 January 2014

Publication Date:
05 March 2014 (online)


Abstract

A safe and fast method for the production of β-hydroxy-α-diazoesters in continuous flow technology is described. The synthesis involves the formation of ethyl diazoacetate in situ and the addition to several aldehydes in a two-step continuous flow microreactor setup. Rhodium acetate catalyzes a subsequent 1,2-hydride shift to give access to β-keto esters in a three-step sequence.

 
  • References and Notes


    • For selected reviews on diazo compounds, see:
    • 1a Ye T, McKervey A. Chem. Rev. 1994; 94: 1091
    • 1b Zhang Z, Wang J. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 6577

      For selected reviews on cyclopropanations using diazo compounds, see:
    • 2a Intrieri D, Caselli A, Gallo E. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011; 5071
    • 2b Grygorenko OO, Artamonov OS, Komarov IV, Mykhailiuk PK. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 803
    • 2c Honma M, Takeda H, Takano M, Nakada M. Synlett 2009; 1695
  • 3 Gioiello A, Venturino F, Marinozzi M, Natalini B, Pellicciari R. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 7431
  • 4 Trost BM, Malhotra S, Koschker P, Ellerbrock P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 2075
  • 5 Trost BM, Malhotra S, Ellerbrock P. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 440
  • 6 Shi W, Ma M, Wang J. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2004; 15: 911
  • 7 Jabre ND, Brewer M. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 9910
  • 8 Shu Z, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang J. Chem. Lett. 2011; 40: 1009
  • 9 Proctor LD, Warr AJ. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2002; 6: 884
  • 10 Huang Y.-S, Zhang W.-Q, Zhang P.-F, Liu X.-G. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010; 49: 12164
    • 11a Microreactors in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis. Wirth T. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2013
    • 11b Wegner J, Ceylan S, Kirschning A. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 4583
    • 11c Flash Chemistry . Yoshida J. Wiley; Chichester: 2008
    • 12a Brandt JC, Wirth T. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2009; 5: No. 30
    • 12b Delville MM. E, Nieuwland PJ, Janssen P, Koch K, van Hest JC. M, Rutjes FP. J. T. Chem. Eng. J. 2011; 167: 556
    • 12c O’Brien AG, Lévesque F, Suzuki Y, Seeberger PH. Chem. Oggi 2011; 29: 57
  • 13 Baumann M, Baxendale IR, Ley SV. Synlett 2008; 2111
  • 14 Kleinke AS, Jamison TF. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 710
    • 15a Chernyak N, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 12466
    • 15b Hu DX, O’Brien M, Ley SV. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4246
    • 15c Ahmed-Omer B, Barrow DA, Wirth T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 3352
    • 16a Bartrum HE, Blakemore DC, Moody CJ, Hayes CJ. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 2276
    • 16b Kupracz L, Kirschning A. J. Flow Chem. 2012; 3: 11
    • 16c Rossi E, Woehl P, Maggini M. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2012; 16: 1146
    • 16d Hu DX, O’Brien M, Ley SV. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 4246
    • 16e Krawczyk M, Kulkarni Y. Int. Patent WO2012128985, 2012
    • 16f Martin LJ, Marzinzik AL, Ley SV, Baxendale IR. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 320
    • 16g Bartrum HE, Blakemore DC, Moody CJ, Hayes CJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 9586
    • 16h Bartrum HE, Blakemore DC, Moody CJ, Hayes CJ. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 8674
    • 16i Maurya RA, Park CP, Lee JH, Kim D.-P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 5952
    • 16j Vaske YS. M, Mahoney ME, Konopelski JP, Rogow DL, McDonald WJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 11379
    • 16k Struempel M, Ondruschka B, Stark A. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2009; 13: 1014
  • 17 Maas G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 8186
  • 18 Delville MM. E, van Hest JC. M, Rutjes FP. J. T. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013; 9: 1813
  • 19 Zhang Y, Wang J. Chem. Commun. 2009; 5350
  • 20 Zhang Y, Wang J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 1285
  • 21 Xiao F, Liu Y, Wang J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 1147
  • 22 Pellicciari R, Fringuelli R, Ceccherelli P, Sisani E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979; 959
  • 23 General Procedure for the Two-Step Process: Glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride (1.12 g, 8 mmol) was dissolved in H2O (2.5 mL) and 5% sulfuric acid (0.76 mL, w/w) was added and a 4-mL syringe was equipped with the mixture. Next, NaNO2 (664 mg, 10 mmol) was dissolved in H2O (3.9 mL) and another 4-mL syringe was equipped with this solution. The two syringes were connected to a flow setup with a T-piece mixer and a 0.9-mL coil (PTFE, i.d. = 0.5 mm). 1,8-Diazabicycloundec-7-ene (596 μL, 4 mmol) was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (3.4 mL) and charged into a 4-mL syringe. Aldehyde (4 mmol) was dissolved in the required amount of DMSO to have a solution of exactly 4 mL volume. This mixture was charged into another 4-mL syringe. Both syringes were put to another syringe pump and connected with two T-pieces to the outlet of the first coil as well as to the inlet of the second coil. The second coil consisted of a 2-mL coil (PTFE, i.d. = 0.8 mm). The pumps were set to 4 mL/h and the entire setup ran for 28 min to reach the steady state. Afterwards, the product was collected for 20–30 min in NaHCO3 as quenching agent. Extraction was performed with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL), the combined organic layers were washed with H2O thoroughly (3 × 10 mL) and dried over anhyd MgSO4. After evaporating the solvent in vacuo, the diazoalcohol was purified by column chromatography (hexane–EtOAc gradient, 100% hexane to 85% hexane). Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoate (4a): obtained as a yellow thick oil; 363 mg (30 min collection time; 82% yield; 6.05 g, 115 min collection time, 72%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.57 (m, 5 H, ArH), 6.11 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 4.47 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.26 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.50 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.8, 139.2, 129.1, 128.6, 126.0, 69.2, 61.6, 15.0. MS (EI): m/z = 220.09 [M+]. Ethyl 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-diazo-3-hydroxypropanoate (4b): obtained as a yellow oil; 295 mg (20 min collection time; 74% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.79 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.58 (m, 2 H, ArH), 6.15 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 4.55 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.47 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.58 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.8, 138.4, 132.5, 128.1, 122.8, 68.8, 61.8, 15.0. MS (EI): m/z = 297.98 [M+]. Ethyl 3-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-diazo-3-hydroxypropanoate (4c): obtained as a yellow oil; 421 mg (22 min collection time; 96% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.71 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.57 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.39 (td, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.20 (td, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.09 (s, 1 H, CHOH), 4.29 (m, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.34 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.30 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.3, 137.7, 132.9, 127.8, 127.6, 121.6, 68.8, 61.3, 14.8. Ethyl 3-(3-Bromophenyl)-2-diazo-3-hydroxypropanoate (4d): obtained as a yellow oil; 362 mg (22 min collection time; 82% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (m, 1 H, ArH), 7.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.26 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 5.87 (s, 1 H, CHOH), 4.28 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.09 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.30 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.2, 141.1, 131.4, 130.5, 128.9, 124.5, 123.0, 68.1, 61.4, 14.5. Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-hydroxy-3-(p-tolyl)propanoate (4e): obtained as a yellow oil; 203 mg (17 min collection time; 77% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 5.88 (s, 1 H, CHOH), 4.27 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.12 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 2.35 (s, 3 H, ArMe), 1.29 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.5, 138.2, 135.6, 129.4, 125.7, 68.7, 61.1, 21.1, 14.5. Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (4f): obtained as a yellow solid; 328 mg (22 min collection time; 85% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.44 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.28 (td, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.98 (dt, J = 7.5, 1 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 5.90 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 4.25 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CO2CH 2CH3), 4.08 (m, 2 H, OCH 2CH3), 3.62 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.42 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, OCH2CH 3), 1.29 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CO2CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.5, 155.4, 129.3, 127.2, 127.2, 120.8, 111.2, 66.4, 63.7, 60.9, 14.8, 14.5. Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (4g): obtained as a yellow oil; 259.8 mg (20 min collection time; 1.09 mmol, 82%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.68 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.35 (m, 2 H, ArH), 6.17 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 4.55 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.36 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.57 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.0, 163.5 (d, J = 234 Hz), 135.4, 128.2 (d, J = 9 Hz), 116.3 (d, J = 20 Hz), 68.8, 61.9, 15.1. MS (EI): m/z = 238.07 [M+]. Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-hydroxyoctanoate (4h): obtained as pale yellow oil; 188 mg (20 min collection time; 66% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.90 (dt, J = 4.5, 9.5 Hz, 1 H, CHOH), 4.47 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, OCH 2CH3), 2.80 (br s, 1 H, CHOH), 1.86 (m, 2 H, CH 2CHOH), 1.53 (m, 9 H, CH 2CH 2CH 2CH 3), 1.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, OCH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.3, 67.3, 61.6, 34.5, 32.0, 25.8, 23.1, 15.1, 14.6. MS (EI): m/z = 214.14 [M+]. Ethyl 2-Diazo-3-(furan-2-yl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (4i): obtained as a yellow oil; 94 mg (15 min collection time; 45% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.49 (t, J = 0.8 Hz, 1 H, OCH=C), 6.46 (m, 2 H, CH=CH), 5.91 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.64 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.35 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.1, 143.4, 143.1, 110.7, 107.8, 63.9, 61.5, 14.7. MS (EI): m/z = 208.11 [M+]. Ethyl 3-(Bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-2-yl)-2-diazo-3-hydroxypropanoate (4j): obtained as a yellow oil; 238 mg (20 min collection time; 75% yield). MS (EI): m/z = 236.12 [M+]. General Procedure for the Three-Step Process: Syringes, pumps, reagents and flow setup were built the way as described for the two-step procedure. Rhodium acetate dimer (0.025 mmol, 11 mg) was dissolved in a H2O–DMSO (1:1; 10 mL) mixture. The solution was charged onto a 10-mL syringe and put on a third syringe pump which was calibrated on a flow rate of 16 mL/h to run through the third reactor (i.d. 0.8 mm, 1 mL). After the first two reactors had reached steady state, the third pump was started and collection commenced after another 4 min after the last reactor has reached steady state. The product was collected for 20–30 min in sat. NaHCO3 solution. Extraction was performed with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL), the combined organic layers were washed with H2O (3 × 10 mL) and dried over anhyd MgSO4. After evaporating the solvent in vacuo, the β-keto ester was purified by column chromatography (hexane–EtOAc, 98:2). Ethyl 3-Oxo-3-phenylpropanoate (5a): obtained as a colourless oil; 187 mg (20 min collection time; 73% yield). Keto form: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.88 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.39 (m, 3 H, ArH), 4.14 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 3.92 (s, 2 H, OCCH2CO), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, CH 3CH2). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 193.2, 168.1, 134.4, 129.4, 60.9, 40.6, 14.6. Enol form: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.78 (s, 1 H, OH), 7.70 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.53 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.34 (m, 1 H, ArH), 5.60 (s, 1 H, C=CH), 4.19 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, OCH 2CH3), 1.26 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H, OCH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.8, 172.0, 134.0, 131.8, 126.6, 88.0, 60.9, 14.9. MS (EI): m/z = 192.07 [M+].
  • 24 During the finalization of this manuscript, a similar report has been published: Maurya RA, Min K.-I, Kim D.-P. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 116