Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(01): 69-74
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343404
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neuromuscular Adaptations to Constant vs. Variable Resistance Training in Older Men

S. Walker
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
,
H. Peltonen
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
,
J. Sautel
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
,
C. Scaramella
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
,
W. J. Kraemer
2   Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
,
J. Avela
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
,
K. Häkkinen
1   Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 06 March 2013

Publication Date:
03 July 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study examined the effects of constant or variable external resistance training on neuromuscular adaptations in the lower limbs of older men. 37 subjects (age 65±4 year) were quasi-randomly assigned to the constant or variable training group, or a non-training control group. Training consisted of a 20-week medium-intensity, high volume resistance training program. Maximum bilateral concentric and isometric force production of the leg extensors as well as repetitions-to-failure test were performed pre-, mid- and post-training. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area was assessed by ultrasound and lean leg mass was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Both training groups significantly increased force production of the leg extensors (variable: 26 kg, 95% CI=12–39, P<0.01; constant: 31 kg, 95% CI=19–43, P<0.01) and VL cross-sectional area (variable: 1.5 cm2, 95% CI=0.03–3.1, P=0.046; constant: 3 cm2, 95% CI=1.2–4.8, P=0.002). However, only the variable training group significantly improved repetitions to failure performance (704 kg, 95% CI=45–1 364, P=0.035). Only the variable resistance training group improved fatigue-resistance properties, which may be an important adaptation to maintain exercise and functional capacity in older individuals.

Key words

force production - hypertrophy - neural adaptation - quadriceps
 

  • References

  • 1 Ahtiainen JP, Hoffren M, Hulmi JJ, Pietikäinen M, Mero AA, Avela J, Häkkinen K. Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 273-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Anderson CE, Sforzo GA, Sigg JA. The effects of combining elastic and free weight resistance on strength and power in athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 567-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bellar DM, Muller MD, Barkley JE, Kim CH, Ida K, Ryan EJ, Bliss MV, Glickman EL. The effects of combined elastic- and free-weight tension vs. free-weight tension on one-repetition maximum strength in the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 459-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bellemare F, Bigland-Ritchie B. Assessment of human diaphragm strength and activation using phrenic nerve stimulation. Respir Physiol 1984; 58: 263-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De Vos NJ, Singh NA, Ross DA, Stavrinos TM, Orr R, Fiatarone Singh MA. Optimal load for increasing muscle power during explosive resistance training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60A: 638-647
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Frost DM, Cronin J, Newton RU. A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance. Sports Med 2010; 40: 303-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C. European recommendations for surface electromyography: result of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development; Enschede, The Netherlands: 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bamman MM. Effects of resistance training on older adults. Sports Med 2004; 34: 329-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Häkkinen K, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Effects of fatiguing loading with a variable resistance equipment on neural activation and force production of the knee extensor muscles. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 28: 79-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A. Acute hormonal responses to heavy resistance exercise in men and women at different ages. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16: 507-513
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Mälkiä E, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, Alen M. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1341-1349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Karavirta L, Häkkinen A, Sillanpää E, Garcia-Lopez D, Kauhanen A, Haapasaari A, Alen M, Pakarinen A, Kraemer WJ, Izquierdo M, Gorostiaga E, Häkkinen K. Effects of combined endurance and strength training on muscle strength, power and hypertrophy in 40-60-year-old men. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011; 21: 402-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K, Newton RU, Nindl BC, Volek JS, McCormick M, Gotshalk LA, Gordon SE, Fleck SJ, Campbell WW, Putukian M, Evans WJ. Effects of heavy-resistance training on hormonal response patterns in younger vs. older men. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 982-992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mero AA, Hulmi JJ, Salmijärvi H, Katajavuori M, Haverinen M, Holviala J, Ridanpää T, Häkkinen K, Kovanen V, Ahtiainen JP, Selänne H. Resistance training increases in muscle fiber size in young and older men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2466-x.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Noorkoiv M, Nosaka K, Blazevich AJ. Assessment of quadricepzs muscle cross-sectional area by ultrasound extended-field-of-view imaging. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 631-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: A meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 249-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sillanpää E, Häkkinen A, Nyman K, Mattila M, Cheng S, Karavirta L, Laaksonen DE, Huuhka N, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Body composition and fitness during strength and/or endurance training in older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 950-958
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Skelton DA, Young A, Greig CA, Malbut KE. Effects of resistance training on strength, power, and selected functional abilities of women aged 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 1081-1087
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, Garhammer J, McMillan J, Rozenek R. A theoretical model of strength training. Nat Str Coaches Assoc J 1982; 4: 36-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Suetta C, Hvid LG, Justesen L, Christensen U, Neergaard K, Simonsen L, Ortenblad N, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M, Aagaard P. Effects of aging on human skeletal muscle after immobilization and retraining. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 1172-1180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Walker S, Taipale RS, Nyman K, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular and hormonal responses to constant and variable resistance loadings. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 26-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomee R. The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Med 2007; 37: 225-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar