Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(02): 153-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343406
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Knee and Hip Joint Biomechanics are Gender-specific in Runners with High Running Mileage

D. Gehring
1   Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
G. Mornieux
1   Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
J. Fleischmann
1   Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
,
A. Gollhofer
1   Department of Sport and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 04 March 2013

Publication Date:
18 July 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Female runners are reported to be more prone to develop specific knee joint injuries than males. It has been suggested that increased frontal plane joint loading might be related to the incidence of these knee injuries in running. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if frontal plane knee and hip joint kinematics and kinetics are gender-specific in runners with high mileage. 3D-kinematics and kinetics were recorded from 16 female and 16 male runners at a speed of 3 m/s, 4 m/s, and 5 m/s. Frontal plane joint angles and joint moments were ascertained and compared between genders among speed conditions. Across all speed conditions, females showed increased hip adduction and reduced knee adduction angles compared to males (p<0.003). The initial peak in the hip adduction moment was enhanced in females (p=0.003). Additionally, the hip adduction impulse showed a trend towards an increase in females at slow running speed (p=0.07). Hip and knee frontal plane joint kinematics are gender-specific. In addition, there are indications that frontal plane joint loading is increased in female runners. Future research should focus on the relationship of these observations regarding overuse running injuries.

Key words

patellofemoral pain - kinematics - women - men
 

  • References

  • 1 Belli A, Kyröläinen H, Komi PV. Moment and power of lower limb joints in running. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 136-141
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boyer KA, Beaupre GS, Andriacchi TP. Gender differences exist in the hip joint moments of healthy older walkers. J Biomech 2008; 41: 3360-3365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chiu MC, Wang MJ. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture 2007; 25: 385-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chumanov ES, Wall-Scheffler C, Heiderscheit BC. Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23: 1260-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cutting JE, Proffitt DR, Kozlowski LT. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1978; 4: 357-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 1991; 10: 575-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Eskofier BM, Kraus M, Worobets JT, Stefanyshyn DJ, Nigg BM. Pattern classification of kinematic and kinetic running data to distinguish gender, shod/barefoot and injury group with feature ranking. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2012; 15: 467-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ferber R, Davis IM, Williams DSI. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clin Biomech 2003; 18: 350-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105: 136-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Heiderscheit BC, Hamill J, Caldwell GE. Influence of Q-angle on lower-extremity running mechanics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000; 30: 271-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effect of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 296-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Heinert BL, Kernozek TW, Greany JF, Fater DC. Hip abductor weakness and lower extremity kinematics during running. J Sport Rehabil 2008; 17: 243-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hreljac A. Impact and overuse injuries in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 845-849
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kerrigan DC, Todd MK, Della CU. Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 2-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Leetun DT, Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Core stability measures as risk factors or lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 926-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M, Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 3059-3065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Moisio KC, Sumner DR, Shott S, Hurwitz DE. Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. J Biomech 2003; 36: 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nakahara I, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Noehren B, Davis I, Hamill J. ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006 – Prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin Biomech 2007; 22: 951-956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Powers CM. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics on patellofemoral joint dysfunction: a theoretical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33: 639-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schache AG, Blanch PD, Rath DA, Wirgley TV, Bennell KL. Are anthropometric and kinematic parameters of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex related to running injuries?. Res Sports Med 2005; 13: 127-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Smith LK, Lelas JL, Kerrigan DC. Gender differences in pelvic motions and center of mass displacement during walking: stereotypes quantified. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002; 11: 453-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stefanyshyn DJ, Stergiou P, Lun VM, Meeuwisse WH, Worobets JT. Knee angular impulse as a predictor of patellofemoral pain in runners. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1844-1851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 95-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Thijs Y, De Clercq D, Roosen P, Witvrouw E. Gait-related intrinsic risk factors for patellofemoral pain in novice recreational runners. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 466-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Van Gent RN, Siem D, Van Middelkoop M, Van Os AG, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Koes BW. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 469-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Willems TM, Witvrouw E, Cock A, De Clercq D. Gait-related risk factors for exercise-related lower-leg pain during shod running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 330-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2005: 63
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002; 35: 543-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar