Proximal-Based Saphenous Neurocutaneous Flaps: A Novel Tool for Reconstructive Surgery in the Proximal Lower Leg and Knee

Abstract

Background Soft tissue defects around the knee region are usually complex and require adequate reconstruction with flaps. In this article, we present our experience using the proximal-based saphenous neurocutaneous flap for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects around the knee and the proximal lower leg.

Methods Between 2008 and 2010, 17 patients with soft tissue defects around the knee and the proximal lower leg were treated with proximal-based saphenous neurocutaneous flaps. The age of patients ranged from 19 to 61 years (mean 35.6 years). Defect sizes ranged from 3 cm × 4 cm to 9 cm × 18 cm and the flaps were designed with sizes ranging from 3 cm × 5 cm to 11 cm × 20 cm. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range 8 to 26 months).

Results Sixteen flaps survived completely, and one flap developed partial necrosis. Mild swelling was observed within a few days postoperatively, and no severe venous congestion occurred. The skin grafts in the donor sites survived completely. All of the 17 flaps gained a good sensory recovery, and only 2 patients complained of numbness on the grafted donor-site during extended follow-up.

Conclusion Our experience has demonstrated that the proximal-based saphenous neurocutaneous flap is a safe and reliable tool for reconstruction of the defects around the proximal lower leg and knee.

Keywords

saphenous neurocutaneous flap - proximal-based flap - reconstructive surgery

• References

• 1 Barfod B, Pers M. Gastrocnemius-plasty for primary closure of compound injuries of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970; 52 (1) 124-127
• 2 Elsahy NI. Cover of the exposed knee joint by the lateral head of the gastrocnemius. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31 (2) 136-137
• 3 Petty CT, Hogue Jr RJ. Closure of an exposed knee joint by use of a sartorius muscle flap: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62 (3) 458-461
• 4 Arnold PG, Prunes-Carrillo F. Vastus medialis muscle flap for functional closure of the exposed knee joint. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68 (1) 69-72
• 5 Swartz WM, Ramasastry SS, McGill JR, Noonan JD. Distally based vastus lateralis muscle flap for coverage of wounds about the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (2) 255-265
• 6 Feldman JJ, Cohen BE, May Jr JW. The medial gastrocnemius myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (4) 531-539
• 7 Tobin GR. Vastus medialis myocutaneous and myocutaneous-tendinous composite flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75 (5) 677-685
• 8 Barclay TL, Sharpe DT, Chisholm EM. Cross-leg fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 (6) 843-847
• 9 Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (6) 1115-1121
• 10 Cavadas PC. Reversed saphenous neurocutaneous island flap: clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (7) 1940-1946
• 11 Cavadas PC. Reversed saphenous neurocutaneous island flap: clinical experience and evolution to the posterior tibial perforator-saphenous subcutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (2) 837-839
• 12 Nenad T, Reiner W, Michael S, Reinhard H, Hans H. Saphenous perforator flap for reconstructive surgery in the lower leg and the foot: a clinical study of 50 patients with posttraumatic osteomyelitis. J Trauma 2010; 68 (5) 1200-1207
• 13 Demirseren ME, Efendioglu K, Demiralp CO, Kilicarslan K, Akkaya H. Clinical experience with a reverse-flow anterolateral thigh perforator flap for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the knee and proximal lower leg. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (12) 1613-1620
• 14 Hallock GG. Local knee random fasciocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 23 (4) 289-296
• 15 Bertelli JA. The saphenous postero-medial cutaneous island thigh flap and the saphenous supero-medial cutaneous island leg flap (25.10.91). Surg Radiol Anat 1992; 14 (2) 187-189
• 16 Stevanović G, Djordjević B, Daković M , et al. [Fasciocutaneous perforators of the lower leg—anatomic study and clinical significance]. Vojnosanit Pregl 2010; 67 (2) 136-144
• 17 Batchelor JS, McGuinness A. A reappraisal of axial and nonaxial lower leg fascial flaps: an anatomic study in human cadavers. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (5) 993-1000
• 18 Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S, Minabe T, Aiso S, Fujino T. Accompanying arteries of the cutaneous veins and cutaneous nerves in the extremities: anatomical study and a concept of the venoadipofascial and/or neuroadipofascial pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (3) 779-791
• 19 Shen YM, Yu DN, Hu XH, Qin FJ, Li M, Ning FG. Repairing proximal and middle lower-leg wounds with retrograde sartorius myocutaneous flap pedicled by perforating branches of medial inferior genicular artery or posterior tibial artery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (9) 1158-1164
• 20 Heymans O, Verhelle N, Peters S. The medial adiposofascial flap of the leg: anatomical basis and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (3) 793-801
• 21 Parodi PC, De Biasio F, Rampino Cordaro E, Guarneri GF, Panizzo N, Riberti C. Distally-based superficial sural flap: advantages of the adipofascial over the fasciocutaneous flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44 (1) 37-43
• 22 Lee SH, Choi TH, Kim SW , et al. An anatomical study of the saphenous nerve, artery, and artery perforators within the thigh using cadaveric dissection. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67 (4) 413-415
• 23 Karamürsel S, Celebioğlu S. Use of the medial side of the knee skin as a free flap: saphenous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (4) 1308-1314
• 24 Wang CY, Chai YM, Wen G , et al. The free peroneal perforator-based sural neurofasciocutaneous flap: a novel tool for reconstruction of large soft-tissue defects in the upper limb. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (1) 293-302
• 25 Moscatiello F, Masià J, Carrera A, Clavero JA, Larrañaga JR, Pons G. The 'propeller' distal anteromedial thigh perforator flap. Anatomic study and clinical applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (12) 1323-1330