Drug Res (Stuttg) 2013; 63(09): 468-472
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1345182
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Ibuprofen Sustained-Release Formulations after Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

L.-F. Luo
1   Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu, P. R. China
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
,
Y. Tian
1   Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu, P. R. China
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
,
H.-M. Guo
1   Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu, P. R. China
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
,
G. Li
1   Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu, P. R. China
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
,
Z.-J. Zhang
1   Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance, China Pharmaceutical University, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu, P. R. China
2   Center for Instrumental Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
3   State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Jiangsu, P. R. China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 12 September 2012

accepted 24 April 2013

Publication Date:
29 May 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability of 2 ibuprofen sustained-release formulations after single and multiple doses.

Methods:

It was conducted on 19 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study. Plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartment model.

Results:

In the single-dose study, the values of Cmax, tmax, t1/2, AUC0–τ, AUC0– for test and reference formulations were 12.59±2.29 and 12.84±2.79 μg/mL, 4.5±1.1 and 4.3±0.7 h, 4.15±1.37 and 4.03±0.86 h, 83.71±21.01 and 86.32±23.42 μg · h/mL, 86.05±21.37 and 88.99±25.33 μg · h/mL, respectively. In the multiple-dose study, the values of Cmax, Cmin, tmax, t1/2, AUCss, DF for test and ­reference formulations were 14.46±3.08 and 14.00±2.61 μg/mL, 0.47±0.21 and 0.63±0.45 μg/mL, 4.0±0.9 and 4.3±0.9 h, 4.69±1.61 and 4.99±2.16 h, 89.11±19.04 and 89.23±20.56 μg · h/mL, 3.25±0.50 and 3.06±0.71, respectively. Single-dose relative bioavailability were 97.8±10.5% for AUC0–τ and multiple-dose relative bioavailability were 100.6±9.4% for AUCss. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80–125%.

Conclusions:

This means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.