Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2013; 40(06): 339-346
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349449
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Differenzielle Wirksamkeit eines Short Message Service (SMS)-basierten Programms zur Förderung des Rauchstopps bei Jugendlichen

Moderators of Outcome in a Text Messaging (SMS)-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young People
Severin Haug
1   Schweizer Institut für Sucht- und Gesundheitsforschung, ein assoziiertes Institut der Universität Zürich, Schweiz
,
Michael P. Schaub
1   Schweizer Institut für Sucht- und Gesundheitsforschung, ein assoziiertes Institut der Universität Zürich, Schweiz
,
Vigeli Venzin
2   Fachstelle Suchtprävention, Mittelschul- und Berufsbildungsamt, Zürich, Schweiz
,
Christian Meyer
3   Institut für Epidemiologie und Sozialmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
,
Ulrich John
3   Institut für Epidemiologie und Sozialmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 September 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Ein SMS-basiertes Programm zur Förderung der Rauchabstinenz bei Auszubildenden konnte deren Zigarettenkonsum reduzieren und begünstigte bei gelegentlich Rauchenden Aufhörversuche.

Methodik: Wir testeten, ob sich die Wirksamkeit des Programms in Abhängigkeit von demografischen, gesundheits- oder rauchspezifischen Charakteristika der Teilnehmenden unterscheidet.

Ergebnisse: Es wurden Subgruppen identifiziert, bei denen der Einsatz des Programms besonders sinnvoll erscheint.

Schlussfolgerung: Eine Programmoptimierung und mögliche Wirksamkeitssteigerung ist auf Grundlage der vorliegenden Ergebnisse möglich.

Abstract

Background: The results of a cluster randomised trial testing the efficacy of a text messaging (SMS)-based program for smoking cessation in vocational school students showed no short-term effects on smoking cessation; however the program resulted in lower cigarette consumption. Furthermore, occasional smokers of the intervention group made more attempts to quit smoking than occasional smokers in the control group.

Methods: Moderator analyses were conducted to test whether program efficacy differed according to demographic, health- and smoking-related baseline variables of the participants.

Results: In daily smokers, reduction of cigarette consumption was not moderated by any of the examined baseline variables. In occasional smokers, age moderated the reduction of cigarette consumption, with a higher reduction in older students. In the subgroup of daily smokers, the intervention more often resulted in progress on the stages of health behaviour change in male smokers and in smokers with at risk drinking. Furthermore, the intervention resulted in more serious quit attempts in daily smokers aged 18 years or older.

Conclusion: The results provide information on subgroups, which particularly benefit from participation in the SMS-program.

Schlüsselwörter

Tabak - Rauchen - Short Message Service (SMS) - Jugendliche - Auszubildende

Keywords

smoking cessation - text messaging - Short Message Service (SMS) - young people - students
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S et al. The 2011 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 36 European countries. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs (CAN); 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bundesamt für Statistik. Schulbesuchsquoten der 16–26-Jährigen 2010/11. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Sekretariat der Kultusministerkonferenz. Schüler, Klassen, Lehrer und Absolventen der Schulen 2001 bis 2010. Berlin: Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Haug S, Schaub MP, Salis Gross C et al. Predictors of hazardous drinking, tobacco smoking and physical inactivity in vocational school students. BMC Pub Health 2013; 13: 475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hanke M, Ulbricht S, Freyer-Adam J et al. Tabakrauchen und Alkoholkonsum bei Auszubildenden an beruflichen Schulen in Vorpommern. Gesundheitswesen 2013; 75: 216-224
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grimshaw GM, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD003289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hollis JF, Polen MR, Whitlock EP et al. Teen reach: outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a tobacco reduction program for teens seen in primary medical care. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 981-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bühler A. Rauchstopp bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen – Grundlagen und Intervention. Sucht 2012; 58: 297-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Morgenstern M, Herrmann U, Hanewinkel R. Rauchstopp-Hilfen für Jugendliche: Welche Faktoren beeinflussen Bekanntheit, Akzeptanz und Nutzung? Schlussbericht zum Forschungsprojekt. Kiel: Institut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Petersen KU, Batra A. Suchtpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie: Entwicklungslinien und Fortschritte. Psychiatrie 2011; 8: 219-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Haug S, Meyer C, Gross B et al. Kontinuierliche individuelle Förderung der Rauchabstinenz bei sozial benachteiligten jungen Erwachsenen über das Handy – Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. Gesundheitswesen 2008; 70: 364-371
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: 165-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Free C, Knight R, Robertson S et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 49-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Willemse I, Waller G, Süss D, Genner S, Huber A-L. JAMES: Jugend, Aktivitäten, Medien – Erhebung Schweiz. Zürich: Zürcher Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. JIM 2012. Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. (November 2012). Im Internet: http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/JIM-pdf12/JIM2012_Endversion.pdf (Stand: 12.07.2013)
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Haug S, Schaub MP, Venzin V et al. Efficacy of a Text Messaging (SMS) Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young People: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res [in press]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG et al. Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 59: 877-883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tob Induc Dis 2009; 5: 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Curry SJ, Mermelstein RJ, Sporer AK. Therapy for Specific Problems: Youth Tobacco Cessation. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 229-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Etter JF, Perneger TV. Effectiveness of a computer-tailored smoking cessation program: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2596-2601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Strecher VJ, Shiffman S, West R. Moderators and mediators of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program among nicotine patch users. Nicotine Tob Res 2006; 8 (Suppl. 01) 95-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A et al. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2010; 105: 1381-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Suls JM, Luger TM, Curry SJ et al. Efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42: 655-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol Int Rev 2008; 57: 1-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB et al. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1789-1795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ et al. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: 1208-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R et al. Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol 2009; 28: 183-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cooper TV, Taylor T, Murray A et al. Differences between intermittent and light daily smokers in a population of U.S. military recruits. Nicotine Tob Res 2010; 12: 465-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ICE. Stata J 2005; 5: 527-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McClelland GH, Judd CM. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 376-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pomerleau CS, Pomerleau OF, Garcia AW. Biobehavioral research on nicotine use in women. Brit J Addict 1991; 86: 527-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Royce JM, Corbett K, Sorensen G et al. Gender, social pressure, and smoking cessations: the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) at baseline. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 359-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Noar SM, Chabot M, Zimmerman RS. Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches. Prev Med 2008; 46: 275-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Baumeister SE et al. Proactive interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice: a quasi-randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of computer-tailored letters and physician-delivered brief advice. Addiction 2008; 103: 294-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Velicer WF, Redding CA, Sun X et al. Demographic variables, smoking variables, and outcome across five studies. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 278-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Haug S, Meyer C, Ulbricht S et al. Predictors and moderators of outcome in different brief interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 78: 57-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kleinjan M, Engels RC, van Leeuwe J et al. Mechanisms of adolescent smoking cessation: roles of readiness to quit, nicotine dependence, and smoking of parents and peers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 99: 204-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar