Time to Get Rid of the Clock: Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability in Determination of the O'clock Position of the Femoral Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction

Abstract

This study evaluates intraobserver and interobserver agreement in reporting the o'clock position of the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Four PGY2 residents, four PGY5 residents, and four sports medicine orthopedic surgeons reported the o'clock position of the femoral ACL tunnel in 10 arthroscopic pictures on two occasions 3 months apart. Intraobserver agreement was determined using the intraobserver correlation coefficient (r > 0.576 for 0.05 significance level). Interobserver agreement between members of each group and between reviewer groups was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.75 considered good agreement). Poor interobserver agreement was demonstrated between the attending and PGY2 groups (ICC = 0.1685), between the attending and PGY5 groups (ICC = 0.2982), and between the PGY5 and PGY2 groups (ICC = 0.267). Attending surgeons, PGY5s, and PGY2s demonstrated poor interobserver agreement amongst themselves (ICC = 0.2244, 0.471, and 0.0859, respectively). PGY2s and PGY5s demonstrated good intraobserver agreement, but attending surgeons demonstrated poor intraobserver agreement. Attending orthopedic surgeons and residents of different levels of training interpret the o'clock position of the femoral tunnel differently. Greater years of experience does not improve intraobserver or interobserver agreement on the o'clock position. The clock face terminology for femoral tunnel placement may not be a reliable descriptor for scientific investigations or clinical instruction.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - o'clock - femoral tunnel

• References

• 1 Howell SM. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6 (Suppl. 01) S49-S55
• 2 Miller MD, Olszewski AD. Cruciate ligament graft intra-articular distances. Arthroscopy 1997; 13 (3) 291-295
• 3 Clancy Jr WG. Anatomic endoscopic ACL reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft. Orthopedics 1997; 20 (5) 397-400 , 399–400
• 4 Fu FH, Schulte KR. Anterior cruciate ligament surgery 1996. State of the art?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 325 (325) 19-24
• 5 Garofalo R, Moretti B, Kombot C, Moretti L, Mouhsine E. Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: rationale of the two incision technique. J Orthop Surg 2007; 2: 10
• 6 Grøntvedt T, Pena F, Engebretsen L. Accuracy of femoral tunnel placement and resulting graft force using one- or two-incision drill guides. A cadaver study on ten paired knees. Arthroscopy 1996; 12 (2) 187-192
• 7 Hantes ME, Dailiana Z, Zachos VC, Varitimidis SE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the Bio-TransFix femoral fixation device and anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (5) 497-501
• 8 Jepsen CF, Lundberg-Jensen AK, Faunoe P. Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (12) 1326-1333
• 9 Arnold MP, Kooloos J, van Kampen A. Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (4) 194-199
• 10 Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Charnock BL, Sullivan RT, Garrett Jr WE. Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (6) 1467-1474
• 11 Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter DM , et al. Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (5) 1016-1024
• 12 Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. A comparison of 11 o'clock versus oblique femoral tunnels in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee: knee kinematics during a simulated pivot test. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (5) 912-917
• 13 Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (3) 297-304
• 14 Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Siarava E, Ntoulia A, Mitsionis G, Georgoulis AD. Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (9) 2151-2158
• 15 Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Seo HY, Kim MS, Song EK. In vivo stability and clinical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using low or high femoral tunnel positions. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (1) 127-133
• 16 Sastre S, Popescu D, Núñez M, Pomes J, Tomas X, Peidro L. Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (1) 32-36
• 17 Streich NA, Friedrich K, Gotterbarm T, Schmitt H. Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (3) 232-238
• 18 Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (1) 29-36
• 19 Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (5) 585-592
• 20 Schneider FJ, Kraus T, Linhart WE. [Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon in children]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2008; 20 (4-5) 409-422
• 21 Busam ML, Provencher MT, Bach Jr BR. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs: care and prevention. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (2) 379-394
• 22 Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (1) 199-217
• 23 Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Yagi M, Papageorgiou C, Fu FH. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (6) 907-914
• 24 Hoshino Y, Kim D, Fu FH. Three-dimensional anatomic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament for planning reconstruction. Anat Res Int 2012; 2012: 569704
• 25 Steckel H, Starman JS, Baums MH, Klinger HM, Schultz W, Fu FH. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament double bundle structure: a macroscopic evaluation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007; 17 (4) 387-392
• 26 Azzam MG, Lenarz CJ, Farrow LD, Israel HA, Kieffer DA, Kaar SG. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the clock face representation as used to describe the femoral intercondylar notch. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (8) 1265-1270
• 27 Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research. Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Health; 2000