Antibiotic-Impregnated Cement Embedding Technique for Spinal Instrumentation Infections

Abstract

Background and Study Aims When surgical site infection occurs in patients with an instrumented spine, the management of infection is challenging because a biofilm is formed around the metallic surface of the implant. Although a wide variety of methods to salvage implants has been developed, previously reported methods reduce the patients' quality of life and are frequently time consuming and costly.

Patients and Methods We performed a cement embedding technique in 13 consecutive patients with infection after spinal instrumentation. After meticulous open débridement, the metallic implants were embedded using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) mixed with antibiotics. Antibiotics were selected in each case according to the pathogens and their sensitivity. The wound was primarily closed. We did not restrict the patients' activity postoperatively. The implants were not removed unless it was necessary for further procedures.

Results Nine patients, including those infected by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), were cured by débridement and PMMA embedding followed by systemic antibiotic treatment. No complications were reported.

Conclusions The antibiotic-impregnated PMMA embedding technique is an effective method for the treatment of spinal instrumentation infections. It is easy to perform and is also effective for MRSA infection.

Keywords

spinal instrument - infection - antibiotic impregnated cement - embedding

• References

• 1 Smith J, Bhatia NN. Postoperative spinal infections. In: Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA, , eds. Rothman-Simeone The Spine. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011: 1789-1803
• 2 Sheehan E, McKenna J, Mulhall KJ, Marks P, McCormack D. Adhesion of Staphylococcus to orthopaedic metals, an in vivo study. J Orthop Res 2004; 22 (1) 39-43
• 3 Aydinli U, Karaeminoğullari O, Tişkaya K. Postoperative deep wound infection in instrumented spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 1999; 65 (2) 182-187
• 4 Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa Jr FP. Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13 (5) 422-426
• 5 Levi AD, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg 1997; 86 (6) 975-980
• 6 Vender JR, Hester S, Houle PJ, Choudhri HF, Rekito A, McDonnell DE. The use of closed-suction irrigation systems to manage spinal infections. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3 (4) 276-282
• 7 Chikawa T, Sakai T, Bhatia NN , et al. Retrospective study of deep surgical site infections following spinal surgery and the effectiveness of continuous irrigation. Br J Neurosurg 2011; 25 (5) 621-624
• 8 Ido K, Shimizu K, Nakayama Y, Shikata J, Matsushita M, Nakamura T. Suction/irrigation for deep wound infection after spinal instrumentation: a case study. Eur Spine J 1996; 5 (5) 345-349
• 9 Mehbod AA, Ogilvie JW, Pinto MR , et al. Postoperative deep wound infections in adults after spinal fusion: management with vacuum-assisted wound closure. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 (1) 14-17
• 10 Ploumis A, Mehbod AA, Dressel TD, Dykes DC, Transfeldt EE, Lonstein JE. Therapy of spinal wound infections using vacuum-assisted wound closure: risk factors leading to resistance to treatment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21 (5) 320-323
• 11 Jones GA, Butler J, Lieberman I, Schlenk R. Negative-pressure wound therapy in the treatment of complex postoperative spinal wound infections: complications and lessons learned using vacuum-assisted closure. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (5) 407-411
• 12 Labler L, Keel M, Trentz O, Heinzelmann M. Wound conditioning by vacuum assisted closure (V.A.C.) in postoperative infections after dorsal spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (9) 1388-1396
• 13 Vicario C, de Juan J, Esclarin A, Alcobendas M. Treatment of deep wound infections after spinal fusion with a vacuum-assisted device in patients with spinal cord injury. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73 (1) 102-106
• 14 Ahmed R, Greenlee JD, Traynelis VC. Preservation of spinal instrumentation after development of postoperative bacterial infections in patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25 (6) 299-302
• 15 Pitto RP, Spika IA. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers in two-stage management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2004; 28 (3) 129-133
• 16 Hanssen AD, Spangehl MJ. Practical applications of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for treatment of infected joint replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (427) 79-85
• 17 Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM , et al. Salvage of instrumental lumbar fusions complicated by surgical wound infection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21 (18) 2163-2169
• 18 Gristina AG, Costerton JW. Bacterial adherence to biomaterials and tissue. The significance of its role in clinical sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (2) 264-273
• 19 Donlan RM. Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33 (8) 1387-1392
• 20 Richards BR, Emara KM. Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: revisited. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26 (18) 1990-1996
• 21 Hedequist D, Haugen A, Hresko T , et al. Failure of attempted implant retention in spinal deformity delayed surgical site infections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (1) 60-64
• 22 Seligson D, Mehta S, Voos K, Henry SL, Johnson JR. The use of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads to prevent the evolution of localized infection. J Orthop Trauma 1992; 6 (4) 401-406