Int J Angiol 2016; 25(03): 186-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373734
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Mechanical Chest Compressions in Prolonged Cardiac Arrest due to ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Can Cause Myocardial Contusion

Cyril Stechovsky
1   Department of Cardiology, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Petr Hajek
1   Department of Cardiology, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Simon Cipro
2   Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Josef Veselka
1   Department of Cardiology, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 January 2015 (online)

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome is a common cause of sudden cardiac death. We present a case report of a 60-year-old man without a history of coronary artery disease who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. During transportation to the hospital, he developed ventricular fibrillation (VF) and later pulseless electrical activity. Chest compressions with LUCAS 2 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) automated mechanical compression–decompression device were initiated. Coronary angiography showed total occlusion of the left main coronary artery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed. After the PCI, his heart started to generate effective contractions and LUCAS could be discontinued. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after 90 minutes of cardiac arrest. The patient died of cardiogenic shock 11 hours later. An autopsy revealed a transmural anterolateral myocardial infarction but also massive subepicardial hemorrhage and interstitial edema and hemorrhages on histologic samples from regions of the myocardium outside the infarction itself and also from the right ventricle. These lesions were concluded to be a myocardial contusion. The true incidence of myocardial contusion as a consequence of mechanical chest compressions is not known. We speculate that severe myocardial contusion might have influenced outcome of our patient.

 
  • References

  • 1 Velders MA, Boden H, van der Hoeven BL , et al. Association between angiographic culprit lesion and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Resuscitation 2013; 84 (11) 1530-1535 . Circulation 2012;126:A13080 (Abstract)
  • 2 Lettieri C, Savonitto S, De Servi S , et al; LombardIMA Study Group. Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: early and medium-term outcome. Am Heart J 2009; 157 (3) 569-575 , e1
  • 3 Zimmermann S, Flachskampf FA, Schneider R , et al. Mild therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction: long-term results in clinical practice. Clin Cardiol 2013; 36: 414-421
  • 4 Zimmermann S, Flachskampf FA, Alff A , et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: long-term survival and neurological outcome. Int J Cardiol 2013; 166 (1) 236-241
  • 5 Wagner H, Terkelsen CJ, Friberg H , et al. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: a 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation 2010; 81 (4) 383-387
  • 6 Gates S, Smith JL, Ong GJ, Brace SJ, Perkins GD. Effectiveness of the LUCAS device for mechanical chest compression after cardiac arrest: systematic review of experimental, observational and animal studies. Heart 2012; 98 (12) 908-913
  • 7 El-Chami MF, Nicholson W, Helmy T. Blunt cardiac trauma. J Emerg Med 2008; 35 (2) 127-133
  • 8 Kagawa E, Dote K, Kato M , et al. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiac arrest?: rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2012; 126 (13) 1605-1613