Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377429
Bowel endometriosis mimicking gastrointestinal stromal tumor and diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound
Corresponding author
Publication History
Publication Date:
14 October 2014 (online)
A 51-year-old asymptomatic woman was referred for colorectal cancer screening. During colonoscopy, a rectosigmoid subepithelial lesion was found, measuring approximately 2 cm and covered by normal mucosa ([Fig. 1]). An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed to evaluate the lesion further. Radial and linear probes showed a hypoechoic lesion, measuring 22 × 9 mm, infiltrating the muscularis propria ([Fig. 2], [Fig. 3] and [Fig. 4]). EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the lesion was performed using a 22-gauge needle ([Fig. 5]). Histopathological examination showed the presence of endometrial glands and stroma ([Fig. 6]).












Differentiating between subepithelial lesions may be difficult during regular colonoscopic evaluation. EUS is the best imaging procedure to evaluate subepithelial lesions in the gastrointestinal tract [1]. It is possible to assess the size, layer of origin, and the echotexture of the lesion, and to differentiate between an intramural and extramural lesion [2]. In most cases, a hypoechoic lesion, infiltrating the muscularis propria, favors the diagnosis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, the rectosigmoid region can be affected by a wide variety of conditions, including tumors such as lymphoma, leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, neuroendocrine tumor, and endometriosis.
Bowel endometriosis occurs in 3 % – 37 % of women with endometriosis [3]. Up to 95 % of intestinal endometriosis is found in the rectum and sigmoid colon [4]. Deep invasion of the intestinal wall is frequent, with infiltration of the muscularis propria or even of the submucosa. The mucosa is infiltrated in less than 5 % of intestinal lesions. An accurate evaluation is indispensable for therapeutic decisions, and laparoscopic surgical resection of endometriotic lesions is the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients [5].
In the present case, it was possible to make a diagnosis of bowel endometriosis mimicking GIST using endoscopic ultrasound.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AF_2AH
#
Competing interests: None
-
References
- 1 Landi B, Palazzo L. The role of endosonography in submucosal tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 679-701
- 2 Polkowski M, Butruk E. Submucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15: 33-54
- 3 Williams TJ, Pratt JH. Endometriosis in 1,000 consecutive celiotomies: incidence and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 129: 245-250
- 4 Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Vieira M et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 157-161
- 5 Rossini LG, Ribeiro PA, Rodrigues FC et al. Transrectal ultrasound – techniques and outcomes in the management of intestinal endometriosis. Endosc Ultrasound 2012; 1: 23-35
Corresponding author
-
References
- 1 Landi B, Palazzo L. The role of endosonography in submucosal tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 679-701
- 2 Polkowski M, Butruk E. Submucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15: 33-54
- 3 Williams TJ, Pratt JH. Endometriosis in 1,000 consecutive celiotomies: incidence and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 129: 245-250
- 4 Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Vieira M et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 157-161
- 5 Rossini LG, Ribeiro PA, Rodrigues FC et al. Transrectal ultrasound – techniques and outcomes in the management of intestinal endometriosis. Endosc Ultrasound 2012; 1: 23-35











