Synlett 2014; 25(19): 2802-2805
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379236
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Direct Intramolecular Catalytic Enantioselective Alkylation of Oxazolidinone Bromoalkanoate Imides

Nicolas De Rycke
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0B8, Canada   Fax: +1(514)3983797   Email: jim.gleason@mcgill.ca
,
Jeffrey D. St Denis
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0B8, Canada   Fax: +1(514)3983797   Email: jim.gleason@mcgill.ca
,
Jonathan M. E. Hughes
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0B8, Canada   Fax: +1(514)3983797   Email: jim.gleason@mcgill.ca
,
Kristopher A. Rosadiuk
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0B8, Canada   Fax: +1(514)3983797   Email: jim.gleason@mcgill.ca
,
James L. Gleason*
Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 0B8, Canada   Fax: +1(514)3983797   Email: jim.gleason@mcgill.ca
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 July 2014

Accepted after revision: 11 September 2014

Publication Date:
16 October 2014 (online)


Abstract

Bromoalkanoate imides undergo intramolecular alkylation to form cyclopentane carboximides using catalytic amounts of magnesium bromide in the presence of DBU. Addition of PyBox ligands affords alkylation products with moderate enantioselectivity.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Myers AG, Yang BH, Chen H, Gleason JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 9361
    • 1b Evans DA, Ennis MD, Mathre DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982; 104: 1737
    • 1c Evans DA, Takacs JM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980; 21: 4233
    • 1d Meyers AI, Knaus G, Kamata K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 268
    • 1e Romo D, Meyers AI. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 9503
    • 1f Kummer DA, Chain WJ, Morales MR, Quiroga O, Myers AG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 13231
    • 1g Arpin A, Manthorpe JM, Gleason JL. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 1359
    • 1h Manthorpe JM, Gleason JL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 2338
    • 2a Dolling UH, Davis P, Grabowski EJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 446
    • 2b O’Donnell MJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004; 37: 506
    • 2c Corey EJ, Xu F, Noe MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 12414
    • 2d Lygo B, Wainwright PG. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 8595
    • 2e Imai M, Hagihara A, Kawasaki H, Manabe K, Koga K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 8829
    • 3a Nicewicz DA, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2008; 322: 77
    • 3b Shih H.-W, Vander Wal MN, Grange RL, MacMillan DW. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 13600
    • 4a Gualandi A, Emer E, Capdevila MG, Cozzi PG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7842
    • 4b Cozzi PG, Benfatti F, Zoli L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 1313
    • 4c Brown AR, Kuo W.-H, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 9286
  • 5 Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 62
  • 6 Vignola N, List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 450
  • 7 List B, Čorić I, Grygorenko OO, Kaib PS. J, Komarov I, Lee A, Leutzsch M, Chandra Pan S, Tymtsunik AV, van Gemmeren M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 53: 282
    • 8a Evans DA, Downey CW, Shaw JT, Tedrow JS. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 1127
    • 8b Evans DA, Tedrow JS, Shaw JT, Downey CW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 392
    • 8c Evans DA, Bilodeau MT, Somers TC, Clardy J, Cherry D, Kato Y. J. Org. Chem. 1991; 56: 5750
    • 8d Evans DA, Bartroli J, Shih TL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981; 103: 2127
  • 9 Jiang M, Dalgarno S, Kilner CA, Halcrow MA, Kee TP. Polyhedron 2001; 20: 2151
  • 10 Less hindered trialkylamines such as Et3N and i-PrNEt2 failed to give any product.
  • 11 The reasons behind this observation are unclear but may be linked to the heterogeneity of the samples.
    • 12a Willis MC, Cutting GA, Piccio VJ. D, Durbin MJ, John MP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 1543
    • 12b Yamamoto H, Hayashi S, Kubo M, Harada M, Hasegawa M, Noguchi M, Sumimoto M, Hori K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 2007: 2859
    • 12c Parsons AT, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 3122
  • 13 Resubmission of alkylation product 4a to the alkylation conditions, either in the absence or presence of ligand 5c, produced no change in the observed enantiomeric excess, indicating that the enantioselectivities observed are the kinetic result.
  • 14 The configuration of the major and minor enantiomers has not been assigned.
    • 15a Ternel J, Delevoye L, Agbossou-Niedercorn F, Roisnel T, Gauvin RM, Thomas CM. Dalton Trans. 2010; 39: 3802
    • 15b Panosyan FB, Lough AJ, Chin J. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E 2003; 59: m864
  • 16 General Procedure: In a glove box, an oven-dried 15-mL pressure tube was charged with MgBr2·OEt2 (10.3 mg, 0.040 mmol, 10 mol%) and 4 mL of substrate 3a in a 0.1 M solution in CHCl3 (116.9 mg, 0.40 mmol, 1 equiv). The tube was capped and the mixture was shaken by hand for 30 s. The ligand (400 μL, 0.040 mmol, 10 mol%) was then added via syringe from a 0.1 M stock solution in CHCl3. The mixture was shaken by hand for another 30 s and DBU was then added from a 0.1 M solution in CHCl3 (0.60 mmol, 6 mL, 1.5 equiv) to the tube. This mixture was shaken for 30 s and let stand 24 h without agitation at r.t. After this time, the reaction was quenched by addition of 10% CuSO4 solution (ca. 25 mL) and shaken. The product was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 × 20 mL), the combined extracts were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:0, 3:1) to yield 4a as a clear oil (83.5 mg, 98%). 3-(2,2-Dimethylcyclopentanecarbonyl)oxazolidin-2-one (4a): IR (KBr): 2957, 2918, 2366, 1775, 1691, 1382, 1192, 1021 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.94–4.08 (m, 3 H), 1.99–2.08 (m, 1 H), 1.85–1.96 (m, 1 H), 1.77–1.84 (m, 1 H), 1.65–1.72 (m, 1 H), 1.54–1.61 (m, 1 H), 1.41–1.49 (m, 1 H), 1.09 (s, 3 H), 0.93 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.2, 153.6, 61.6, 50.4, 44.5, 42.9, 41.3, 28.7, 28.4, 24.4, 22.8. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C11H17NO3: 212.1281; found: 212.1281. 3-(Cyclopentanecarbonyl)oxazolidinone (4b): IR (film): 2960, 2872, 1772, 1692, 1383, 1220, 1109, 1040 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.40 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.00 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.86 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.93–1.99 (m, 2 H), 1.60–1.83 (m, 6 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.8, 153.3, 61.8, 42.9, 42.7, 29.9, 29.7, 26.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na+] calcd for C9H13NO3: 206.0788; found: 206.0788. 3-(3,3-Dimethylcyclopentanecarbonyl)oxazolidin-2-one (4c): IR (film): 2959, 2872, 1771, 1690, 1478, 1381, 1361, 1251, 1195, 1102, 1042, 1016 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.39 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.96–4.07 (m, 3 H), 1.88–2.08 (m, 2 H), 1.43–1.82 (m, 4 H), 1.06 (br s, 3 H), 1.01 (br s, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.8, 153.2, 61.8, 44.0, 42.9, 42.3, 40.6, 39.8, 29.0, 28.6, 28.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na+] calcd for C11H17NO3: 234.1101; found: 234.1100. 3-(3-Methylenecyclopentanecarbonyl)oxazolidin-2-one (4d): IR (neat): 1773, 1738, 1695 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.87 (m, 2 H), 4.41 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.93–4.04 (m, 3 H), 2.54–2.68 (m, 2 H), 2.43–2.51 (m, 1 H), 2.30–2.39 (m, 1 H), 2.04–2.12 (m, 1 H), 1.83–1.93 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.5, 153.2, 150.3, 105.9, 61.9, 43.1, 42.8, 36.2, 32.2, 29.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C10H14NO3: 196.0968; found: 196.0970.
  • 17 In addition, we examined the alkylation of a 4-(2-bromo-ethoxy)butanimide which would form a six-membered ring. No product formation was observed.