Download PDF
Aktuelle Neurologie 2014; 41(09): 509-514
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1389923
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neues in der prähospitalen Schlaganfallversorgung

News in Prehospital Stroke Management
C. Weimar
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
H. J. Audebert
2   Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 November 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Nach Etablierung der systemischen Thrombolyse in der Akutversorgung des ischämischen Schlaganfalls konzentrieren sich die Bemühungen zunehmend auf eine Verkürzung der Latenz bis zum Therapiebeginn. Während Patienten-bezogene Verzögerungsfaktoren bisher allenfalls moderat und kurzfristig durch entsprechende Aufklärungsmaßnahmen reduziert werden konnten, ergeben sich sowohl für die prähospitale Rettungsdienstversorgung als auch die initiale Versorgung im Krankenhaus zahlreiche Ansatzmöglichkeiten um die Zeit bis zum Beginn der Thrombolyse weiter zu verkürzen. Verschiedene Diagnosealgorithmen sollen der Einsatzzentrale helfen, umgehend auf einen Notruf mit Schilderung von möglichen Schlaganfallsymptomen zu reagieren. Die Aufgabe der Rettungskräfte ist dann nach Sicherung der Vitalfunktionen in erster Linie die unverzügliche Zuweisung in eine Stroke Unit, wobei eine telefonische Vorankündigung mit Angabe der Symptome und Vormedikation dort die Reaktionszeit verkürzen kann. Die sogenannte Door-to-Needle-Zeit im Krankenhaus kann dann durch weitere einfache Maßnahmen auf Latenzen deutlich unter 1 h gesenkt werden. Der Einsatz von Labordiagnostik, Schnittbildgebung oder Ultraschall bereits im Rettungswagen zur Indikationsstellung einer systemischen Lysetherapie ist derzeit Gegenstand mehrerer Studien. In 2 Projekten mit einem Computer­tomografen im Rettungswagen konnte so bereits eine deutliche Verkürzung der Latenz bis zum Beginn der Lysetherapie nachgewiesen werden. Vor einer Übernahme in die Regelversorgung in Ballungsräumen oder ländlichen Gegenden ist jedoch eine gesundheitsökonomische Analyse der erzielbaren klinischen Effekte erforderlich.

Abstract

Following systemic thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke, efforts must be directed to reducing delay between symptom onset and start of thrombolysis. While patient-related delays in the past could at best be improved only modestly and for a limited time by educational campaigns, there are multiple ways to shorten delays in pre-hospital patient management as well as during early hospital care. Various diagnostic algorithms can support dispatch services to quickly react to an emergency call with suspected stroke symptoms. After securing the vital functions, emergency (para)medical personnel should immediately transfer a suspected stroke patient to the nearest stroke unit. In-advance information to the hospital team about symptoms and previous medication can further shorten the admission process. The door-to-needle time can thus be reduced to less than an hour by relatively simple measures. Studies are currently investigating the potential benefit of laboratory diagnostics, cerebral imaging or transcranial ultrasound before or during transfer. Two projects with a CT built into an ambulance car have already demonstrated a markedly reduced delay between symptom onset and systemic thrombolysis. However, an economic analysis of clinical benefits is needed before this concept can be adapted to metropolitan or rural regions.

Schlüsselwörter

Schlaganfall - prähospitale Versorgung - Thrombolyse - Zuverlegungstriage - Hirninfarkt

Keywords

stroke - prehospital management - thrombolysis - referral strategy - cerebral infarction
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Evenson KR, Foraker RE, Morris DL et al. A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care. Int J Stroke 2009; 4: 187-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shah M, Makinde KA, Thomas P. Cognitive and behavioral aspects affecting early referral of acute stroke patients to hospital. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 16: 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marx JJ, Nedelmann M, Haertle B et al. An educational multimedia campaign has differential effects on public stroke knowledge and care-seeking behavior. J Neurol 2008; 255: 378-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Muller-Nordhorn J, Wegscheider K, Nolte CH et al. Population-based intervention to reduce prehospital delays in patients with cerebrovascular events. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1484-1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Teuschl Y, Brainin M. Stroke education: discrepancies among factors influencing prehospital delay and stroke knowledge. Int J Stroke 2010; 5: 187-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schilling M, Kros M, Ritter M et al. Concept for allocation of acute stroke patients: evaluation of the quality of diagnosis reached by the emergency medical services of Munster. Nervenarzt 2012; 83: 759-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buck BH, Starkman S, Eckstein M et al. Dispatcher recognition of stroke using the National Academy Medical Priority Dispatch System. Stroke 2009; 40: 2027-2030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Krebes S, Ebinger M, Baumann AM et al. Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. Stroke 2012; 43: 776-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Handschu R, Poppe R, Rauss J et al. Emergency calls in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 1005-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kessler C, Khaw AV, Nabavi DG et al. Standardized prehospital treatment of stroke. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108: 585-591
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 He J, Zhang Y, Xu T et al. Effects of immediate blood pressure reduction on death and major disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the CATIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 479-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke 2003; 34: 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kleindorfer DO, Miller R, Moomaw CJ et al. Designing a message for public education regarding stroke: does FAST capture enough stroke?. Stroke 2007; 38: 2864-2868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wojner-Alexandrov AW, Alexandrov AV, Rodriguez D et al. Houston paramedic and emergency stroke treatment and outcomes study (HoPSTO). Stroke 2005; 36: 1512-1518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bray JE, Martin J, Cooper G et al. An interventional study to improve paramedic diagnosis of stroke. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005; 9: 297-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S et al. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology 2012; 79: 306-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Quain DA, Parsons MW, Loudfoot AR et al. Improving access to acute stroke therapies: a controlled trial of organised pre-hospital and emergency care. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 429-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4.5 h after acute ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1303-1309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL et al. Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle-times within 60 minutes. Circulation 2011; 123: 750-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kohrmann M, Schellinger PD, Breuer L et al. Avoiding in hospital delays and eliminating the three-hour effect in thrombolysis for stroke. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 493-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ziegler V, Rashid A, Muller-Gorchs M et al. Mobile computing systems in preclinical care of stroke. Results of the Stroke Angel initiative within the BMBF project PerCoMed. Anaesthesist 2008; 57: 677-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McKinney JS, Mylavarapu K, Lane J et al. Hospital prenotification of stroke patients by emergency medical services improves stroke time targets. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 113-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lin CB, Peterson ED, Smith EE et al. Emergency medical service hospital prenotification is associated with improved evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5: 514-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 LaMonte MP, Xiao Y, Hu PF et al. Shortening time to stroke treatment using ambulance telemedicine: TeleBAT. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 13: 148-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Liman TG, Winter B, Waldschmidt C et al. Telestroke Ambulances in Prehospital Stroke Management: Concept and Pilot Feasibility Study. Stroke 2012;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bergrath S, Reich A, Rossaint R et al. Feasibility of prehospital teleconsultation in acute stroke – a pilot study in clinical routine. PLoS One 2012; 7: e36796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Schlachetzki F, Herzberg M, Holscher T et al. Transcranial Ultrasound from Diagnosis to Early Stroke Treatment – Part 2: Prehospital Neurosonography in Patients with Acute Stroke – The Regensburg Stroke Mobile Project. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 33: 262-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 397-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ebinger M, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C et al. PHANTOM-S: the prehospital acute neurological therapy and optimization of medical care in stroke patients – study. Int J Stroke 2012; 7: 348-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Weber JE, Ebinger M, Rozanski M et al. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute stroke: Results of the PHANTOM-S pilot study. Neurology 2013; 80: 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ebinger M, Lindenlaub S, Kunz A et al. Prehospital thrombolysis: a manual from Berlin. J Vis Exp 2013; e50534
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Gierhake D, Weber JE, Villringer K et al. Mobile CT: technical aspects of prehospital stroke imaging before intravenous thrombolysis. Rofo 2013; 185: 55-59
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1622-1631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kostopoulos P, Walter S, Haass A et al. Mobile stroke unit for diagnosis-based triage of persons with suspected stroke. Neurology 2012; 78: 1849-1852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar