Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2015; 28(01): 012-020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545065
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Utilizing the Multidisciplinary Team for Planning and Monitoring Care and Quality Improvement

A. Patel
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Edward R. Franko Jr.
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
James W. Fleshman
2   Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 February 2015 (online)

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team management of patients with rectal cancer requires a dedicated group of surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and mid-level providers who meet to discuss every patient with rectal cancer. The data from that meeting is collected prospectively, recommendations made for case, follow-up obtained, and quality issues monitored. Improved case is the result.

 
  • References

  • 1 McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 1991; 302 (6791) 1501-1505
  • 2 Wexner SD, Rotholtz NA. Surgeon influenced variables in resectional rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (11) 1606-1627
  • 3 Dietz DW ; Consortium for Optimizing Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer (OSTRiCh). Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer: the OSTRICH. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17 (10) 1863-1868
  • 4 Calman K, Hine D. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services. London: Department of Health; 1995
  • 5 Verdecchia A, Guzzinati S, Francisci S , et al; EUROCARE Working Group. Survival trends in European cancer patients diagnosed from 1988 to 1999. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45 (6) 1042-1066
  • 6 Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?. Br J Surg 1982; 69 (10) 613-616
  • 7 Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1 (8496) 1479-1482
  • 8 Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE , et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg 2005; 92 (2) 225-229
  • 9 Wille-Jørgensen P, Sparre P, Glenthøj A , et al. Result of the implementation of multidisciplinary teams in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (4) 410-413
  • 10 Ortiz H, Wibe A, Ciga MA, Lujan J, Codina A, Biondo S ; Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. Impact of a multidisciplinary team training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Spain. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (5) 544-551
  • 11 Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J , et al; Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (7) 857-866
  • 12 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancers: Manual Update. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004
  • 13 Jessop J, Daniels I. The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of colorectal cancer. In: Scholefield JH, Abcarian H, Maughan T, , eds. Challenges in Colorectal Cancer. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006: 167-177
  • 14 The International Working Group in Colorectal Cancer. An international, multidisciplinary approach to the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997; 23 (Suppl A): 1-66
  • 15 Obias VJ, Reynolds Jr HL. Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20 (3) 143-147