Zentralbl Chir 2016; 141(05): 538-544
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545904
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

CAMIC-Empfehlungen zur chirurgischen Laparoskopie aus nicht geburtshilflicher Indikation während der Schwangerschaft

CAMIC Recommendations for Surgical Laparoscopy in Non-Obstetric Indications during Pregnancy
S. Förster
1   Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Deutschland
,
T. Reimer
2   Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock
,
S. Rimbach
3   Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Feldkirch, Österreich
12   Für die Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Endoskopie (AGE) der DGGG
,
F. Louwen
4   Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main
13   Für die Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin (AGG) der DGGG
,
T. Volk
5   Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saar
14   Für den wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreis Regionalanästhesie und geburtshilfliche Anästhesie der DGAI
,
H. Bürkle
6   Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
14   Für den wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreis Regionalanästhesie und geburtshilfliche Anästhesie der DGAI
,
C. Benecke
7   Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
11   Für die Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie (CAMIC) der DGAV
,
T. Carus
8   Klinik für Allgemin-, Viszeral- und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Bremen Ost
11   Für die Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie (CAMIC) der DGAV
,
A. Türler
9   Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Johanniter-Klinikum Bonn
11   Für die Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie (CAMIC) der DGAV
,
C. Wullstein
10   Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimalinvasive Chirurgie, Helios Klinikum Krefeld
11   Für die Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie (CAMIC) der DGAV
,
K. Ludwig
1   Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Deutschland
11   Für die Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie (CAMIC) der DGAV
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 July 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In der operativ chirurgischen Grundversorgung hat sich die laparoskopische Operationstechnik in den letzten Jahren fest etabliert. Inzwischen werden in der Normalpopulation über 90 % aller Cholezystektomien und über 80 % aller Appendektomien minimalinvasiv durchgeführt. Die nachgewiesenen Vorteile der laparoskopischen Operationstechnik liegen gegenüber konventionell offenen Operationen in einer vergleichsweise schnelleren frühpostoperativen Erholung mit frühzeitiger Wiederaufnahme der allgemeinen körperlichen sowie beruflichen Aktivität. Da diese Vorteile gleichermaßen für notwendige Eingriffe während einer Schwangerschaft nachweisbar sind, wurde in den letzten Jahren auch während der Schwangerschaft zunehmend minimalinvasiv aus nicht geburtshilflicher Indikation operiert. Insgesamt ist davon auszugehen, dass derartige Eingriffe bei ca. 2 % der schwangeren Patientinnen durchgeführt werden müssen. Zahlreiche Studien konnten dabei belegen, dass der Einsatz laparoskopischer Techniken insbesondere für die werdende Mutter sicher und nicht mit einem erhöhten Risiko verbunden ist. Auf der anderen Seite macht die bestehende Schwangerschaft ein adaptiertes Vorgehen bei der Lösung chirurgischer Probleme erforderlich, um den Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes zu gewährleisten. Unter Zugrundelegung der aktuell verfügbaren Datenlage werden Empfehlungen formuliert, die für eine Vielzahl klinischer Situationen als Entscheidungshilfe herangezogen werden können.

Abstract

In the operative surgical primary care, the laparoscopic surgical technique has firmly established itself in recent years. Meanwhile, in the normal population over 90 % of all cholecystectomies and over 80 % of all appendectomies are performed in a minimally invasive manner. The proven benefits of the laparoscopic surgical technique, compared with conventional open surgery, are a comparatively rapid early postoperative recovery with early resumption of the general physical and occupational activity. As these benefits are equally applicable for necessary interventions during pregnancy, in recent years laparoscopy has become the preferred treatment for non-obstetric indications in the gravid patient. Overall, it can be assumed that such interventions have to be performed in approximately 2 % of all pregnant patients. Numerous studies have proven here that the use of laparoscopic techniques, in particular for the expectant mother, is safe and not associated with an increased risk. On the other hand, the current pregnancy makes necessary an adapted approach to the solution of surgical problems to ensure the protection of the unborn child. On the basis of currently available data situation, recommendations are formulated which can be used as a decision-making support for a variety of clinical situations.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Cheek TG, Baird E. Anesthesia for nonobstetric surgery: maternal and fetal considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52: 535-545
  • 2 Gilo NB, Amini D, Landy HJ. Appendicitis and cholecystitis in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52: 586-596
  • 3 Kammerer WS. Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 1987; 71: 551-560
  • 4 Reedy MB, Källén B, Kuehl TJ. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a study of five fetal outcome parameters with use of the Swedish Health Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 673-679
  • 5 Oelsner G, Stockheim D, Soriano D et al. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy in pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 200-204
  • 6 Affleck DG, Handrahan DL, Egger MJ et al. The laparoscopic management of appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 523-529
  • 7 Rollins MD, Chan KJ, Price RR. Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: a new standard of care. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 237-241
  • 8 Lemieux P, Rheaume P, Levesque I et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant patients: a review of 45 cases. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1701-1705
  • 9 Fallon Jr WF, Newman JS, Fallon GL et al. The surgical management of intra-abdominal inflammatory conditions during pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 1995; 75: 15-31
  • 10 Erekson EA, Brousseau EC, Dick-Biascoechea MA et al. Maternal postoperative complications after nonobstetric antenatal surgery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 2639-2644
  • 11 Weber AM, Bloom GP, Allan TR et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 958-959
  • 12 Arvidsson D, Gerdin E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 193-194
  • 13 Costantino GN, Vincent GJ, Mukalian GG et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994; 4: 161-164
  • 14 Curet MJ, Allen D, Josloff RK et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 546-550
  • 15 Soriano D, Yefet Y, Seidman DS et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 955-960
  • 16 Reedy MB, Galan HL, Richards WE et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy. A survey of laparoendoscopic surgeons. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 33-38
  • 17 Glasgow RE, Visser BC, Harris HW et al. Changing management of gallstone disease during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 241-246
  • 18 Barone JE, Bears S, Chen S et al. Outcome study of cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 232-236
  • 19 McKellar DP, Anderson CT, Boynton CJ et al. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 465-468
  • 20 Stepp K, Falcone T. Laparoscopy in the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 485-496
  • 21 Clark SL, Cotton DB, Pivarnik JM et al. Position change and central hemodynamic profile during normal third-trimester pregnancy and post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 883-887
  • 22 Pearl J, Price R, Richardson W et al. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3479-3492
  • 23 Juhasz-Böss I, Solomayer E, Strik M et al. Abdominal surgery in pregnancy – an interdisciplinary challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 465-472
  • 24 Friedman JD, Ramsey PS, Ramin KD et al. Pneumoamnion and pregnancy loss after second-trimester laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 512-513
  • 25 Halpern NB. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a review of published experiences and clinical considerations. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998; 5: 129-134
  • 26 Geisler JP, Rose SL, Mernitz CS et al. Non-gynecologic laparoscopy in second and third trimester pregnancy: obstetric implications. JSLS 1998; 2: 235-238
  • 27 Lemaire BM, van Erp WF. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 15-18
  • 28 Hume RF, Killiam AP. Maternal Physiology. In: Scott JR, KiSaia J, Hammon DB, eds. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1990: 93-100
  • 29 Malangoni MA. Gastrointestinal surgery and pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2003; 32: 181-200
  • 30 Van De Velde M, De Buck F. Anesthesia for non-obstetric surgery in the pregnant patient. Minerva Anestesiol 2007; 73: 235-240
  • 31 Bhavani-Shankar K, Steinbrook RA, Brooks DC et al. Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure difference during laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 370-373
  • 32 Graham G, Baxi L, Tharakan T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy: a case series and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53: 566-574
  • 33 Thomas SJ, Brisson P. Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy during pregnancy: six case reports. JSLS 1998; 2: 41-46
  • 34 de Perrot M, Jenny A, Morales M et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 368-371
  • 35 Schreiber JH. Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnancy. Surg Endosc 1990; 4: 100-102
  • 36 Sadot E, Telem DA, Arora M et al. Laparoscopy: a safe approach to appendicitis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 383-389
  • 37 McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A et al. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205: 534-540
  • 38 Walsh CA, Tang T, Walsh SR. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 339-340
  • 39 Wilasrusmee C, Sukrat B, McEvoy M et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1470-1478
  • 40 Cheng HT, Wang YC, Lo HC et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in pregnancy: a population-based analysis of maternal outcome. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 1394-1399
  • 41 Davis A, Katz VL, Cox R. Gallbladder disease in pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 759-762
  • 42 Ghumman E, Barry M, Grace PA. Management of gallstones in pregnancy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1646-1650
  • 43 Chamogeorgakis T, Lo Menzo E, Smink jr. RD et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy: three case reports. JSLS 1999; 3: 67-69
  • 44 Steinbrook RA, Brooks DC, Datta S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Review of anesthetic management, surgical considerations. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 511-515
  • 45 Date RS, Kaushal M, Ramesh A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in pregnancy. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 599-608
  • 46 Andreoli M, Servakov M, Meyers P et al. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 229-233
  • 47 Printen KJ, Ott RA. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Am Surg 1978; 44: 432-434
  • 48 Scott LD. Gallstone disease and pancreatitis in pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21: 803-815
  • 49 Jelin EB, Smink DS, Vernon AH et al. Management of biliary tract disease during pregnancy: a decision analysis. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 54-60
  • 50 Shalhav AL, Landman J, Afane J et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary hyperaldosteronism during pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000; 10: 169-171
  • 51 Finkenstedt G, Gasser RW, Höfle G et al. Pheochromocytoma and sub-clinical Cushingʼs syndrome during pregnancy: diagnosis, medical pre-treatment and cure by laparoscopic unilateral adrenalectomy. J Endocrinol Invest 1999; 22: 551-557
  • 52 Aishima M, Tanaka M, Haraoka M et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a pregnant woman with Cushingʼs syndrome. J Urol 2000; 164: 770-771
  • 53 Lo KW, Lau TK. Cushingʼs syndrome in pregnancy secondary to adrenal adenoma. A case report and literature review. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998; 45: 209-212
  • 54 Pace DE, Chiasson PM, Schlachta CM et al. Minimally invasive adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 122-125
  • 55 Kim PT, Kreisman SH, Vaughn R et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma in pregnancy. Can J Surg 2006; 49: 62-63
  • 56 Griffiths J, Sia W, Shapiro AM et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005; 27: 771-774
  • 57 Hardwick RH, Slade RR, Smith PA et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy in pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; 9: 439-440
  • 58 Allran jr CF, Weiss 3rd CA, Park AE. Urgent laparoscopic splenectomy in a morbidly obese pregnant woman: case report and literature review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12: 445-447
  • 59 Iwase K, Higaki J, Yoon HE et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001; 11: 53-56
  • 60 Anglin BV, Rutherford C, Ramus R et al. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy: laparoscopic treatment. JSLS 2001; 5: 63-67
  • 61 OʼConnor JP, Biyani CS, Taylor J et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal-cell carcinoma during pregnancy. J Endourol 2004; 18: 871-874
  • 62 Sainsbury DC, Dorkin TJ, MacPhail S et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in first-trimester pregnancy. Urology 2004; 64: 1231.e7-8
  • 63 Romero R, Sibai BM, Sanchez-Ramos L et al. An oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) in the treatment of preterm labor: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with tocolytic rescue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1173-1183
  • 64 Berkman ND, Thorp Jr JM, Lohr KN et al. Tocolytic treatment for the management of preterm labor: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1648-1659
  • 65 Tan TC, Devendra K, Tan LK et al. Tocolytic treatment for the management of preterm labour: a systematic review. Singapore Med J 2006; 47: 361-366
  • 66 Melnick DM, Wahl WL, Dalton VK. Management of general surgical problems in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 170-180
  • 67 Casele HL. The use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 895-905