Human Embryo Cryopreservation—Methods, Timing, and other Considerations for Optimizing an Embryo Cryopreservation Program

Abstract

The contribution of embryo cryopreservation to the birth rate per in vitro fertilization cycle has escalated from a rare subsidy to a vital tool that is called upon to augment the cycle outcome. Embryology laboratories must identify the embryo stage, quality criteria and methodology that will optimize their ability to preserve each embryo's reproductive potential. This chapter reviews the principles of cryopreservation, outcomes based on embryo stage and cryopreservation method and benchmarks that may be employed by the laboratory to measure the performance of their embryo cryopreservation program.

Keywords

cryopreservation - embryo - blastocyst - pronuclear stage - vitrification - slow freezing

• References

• 1 Ahlström A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (5) 1199-1209
• 2 Ahlström A, Westin C, Reismer E, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (12) 3289-3296
• 3 Racowsky C, Combelles CM, Nureddin A , et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 6 (3) 323-331
• 4 Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (6) 1155-1158
• 5 El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P. IVF results: optimize not maximize. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (2) 322-331
• 6 Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (1) 3-7
• 7 Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (3) 694-700
• 8 Gerris J, De Neubourg D, De Sutter P, Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M. Cryopreservation as a tool to reduce multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7 (3) 286-294
• 9 Schnorr JA, Doviak MJ, Muasher SJ, Jones Jr HW. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (1) 147-151
• 10 Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Härkki P, Vuoristo P, Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2001; 16 (6) 1140-1144
• 11 Bhattacharya S, Kamath MS. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproduction technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28 (2) 191-199
• 12 Griesinger G, von Otte S, Schroer A , et al. Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (5) 1348-1352
• 13 Queenan Jr JT. Embryo freezing to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 169 (1–2) 79-83
• 14 Pattinson HA, Hignett M, Dunphy BC, Fleetham JA. Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1994; 62 (6) 1192-1196
• 15 Oktay K, Buyuk E, Davis O, Yermakova I, Veeck L, Rosenwaks Z. Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (1) 90-95
• 16 Fuller B, Paynter S. Fundamentals of cryobiology in reproductive medicine. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9 (6) 680-691
• 17 Leibo SP, Pool TB. The principal variables of cryopreservation: solutions, temperatures, and rate changes. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 269-276
• 18 Nagy ZP, Vajta G, Chang C-C, Kort H. The human embryo: vitrification. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, , eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK: Informa; 2009: 275-287
• 19 Arav A, Zeron Y, Leslie SB, Behboodi E, Anderson GB, Crowe JH. Phase transition temperature and chilling sensitivity of bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 1996; 33 (6) 589-599
• 20 Leibo SP, Martino A, Kobayashi S, Pollard JW. Stage-dependent sensitivity of oocytes and embryos to low temperatures. Anim Reprod Sci 1996; 42: 45-53
• 21 Ghetler Y, Yavin S, Shalgi R, Arav A. The effect of chilling on membrane lipid phase transition in human oocytes and zygotes. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (12) 3385-3389
• 22 Songsasen N, Yu IJ, Ratterree MS, VandeVoort CA, Leibo SP. Effect of chilling on the organization of tubulin and chromosomes in rhesus monkey oocytes. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (4) 818-825
• 23 Bianchi V, Coticchio G, Fava L, Flamigni C, Borini A. Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (4) 1078-1083
• 24 Pedro PB, Yokoyama E, Zhu SE , et al. Permeability of mouse oocytes and embryos at various developmental stages to five cryoprotectants. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51 (2) 235-246
• 25 Mazur P. Kinetics of water loss from cells at subzero temperatures and the likelihood of intracellular ice freezing. J Gen Physiol 1963; 47: 347-369
• 26 Mazur P, Leibo SP, Chu EHY. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res 1972; 71 (2) 345-355
• 27 Kleinhans FW, Mazur P. Comparison of actual vs. synthesized ternary phase diagrams for solutes of cryobiological interest. Cryobiology 2007; 54 (2) 212-222
• 28 Rall WF, Meyer TK. Zona fracture damage and its avoidance during the cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology 1989; 31 (3) 683-692
• 29 Gao D, Critser JK. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR J 2000; 41 (4) 187-196
• 30 Rall WF. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos, gametes and ovarian tissue. Current issues and progress. In: Wolf DP, Zelinski-Wooten M, , eds. Assisted Fertilization and Nuclear Transfer in Mammals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2001: 173-187
• 31 Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology 2012; 77 (3) 467-482
• 32 Lindberg A, Ortman K, Alenius S, Seroconversion of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in dairy heifers after embryo transfer. In: Forsberg M, Greve T, Gustafsson H, Katila T, Kindahl H, Ropstad E. , eds. 14th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Stockholm, Sweden; 2000: 250
• 33 Drew TW, Sandvik T, Wakeley P, Jones T, Howard P. BVD virus genotype 2 detected in British cattle. Vet Rec 2002; 151 (18) 551-552
• 34 Bielanski A, Nadin Davis S, Sapp T, Lutze-Wallace C. Viral contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 110-116
• 35 Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PC, Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2003; 46 (2) 146-152
• 36 Shaw JM, Kola I, MacFarlane DR, Trounson AO. An association between chromosomal abnormalities in rapidly frozen 2-cell mouse embryos and the ice-forming properties of the cryoprotective solution. J Reprod Fertil 1991; 91 (1) 9-18
• 37 Houghton FD, Barr KJ, Walter G , et al. Functional significance of gap junctional coupling in preimplantation development. Biol Reprod 2002; 66 (5) 1403-1412
• 38 Vincent C, Johnson MH. Cooling, cryoprotectants, and the cytoskeleton of the mammalian oocyte. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1992; 14: 73-100
• 39 Ahn HJ, Sohn IP, Kwon HC, Jo DH, Park YD, Min CK. Characteristics of the cell membrane fluidity, actin fibers, and mitochondrial dysfunctions of frozen-thawed two-cell mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 61 (4) 466-476
• 40 Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (9) 2006-2010
• 41 Rienzi L, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi F , et al. Laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres from cryopreserved embryos that were partially damaged. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (6) 1196-1201
• 42 Karow Jr AM. Cryopreservation: pharmacological considerations. In: Karow Am, Abouna GJ, , Humphries eds. Organ Preservation for Transplantation. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1974: 86-107
• 43 Agca Y, Liu J, Peter AT, Critser ES, Critser JK. Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 49 (4) 408-415
• 44 Kasai M, Edashige K. Movement of water and cryoprotectants in mouse oocytes and embryos at different stages: relevance to cryopreservation. In: Chian RC, Quinn P, , eds. Fertility Cryopreservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010: 16-23
• 45 Sales AD, Lobo CH, Carvalho AA, Moura AA, Rodrigues APR. Structure, function, and localization of aquaporins: their possible implications on gamete cryopreservation. Genet Mol Res 2013; 12 (4) 6718-6732
• 46 Xiong Y, Tan YJ, Xiong YM , et al. Expression of aquaporins in human embryos and potential role of AQP3 and AQP7 in preimplantation mouse embryo development. Cell Physiol Biochem 2013; 31 (4-5) 649-658
• 47 Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine. The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25 (2) 146-167
• 48 Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18 (5) 536-554
• 49 Veeck Gosden LL, Berrios R, Bodine R, Clarke RM, Zaninovic N. The human embryo: slow freezing. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, , eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK: Informa; 2009: 275-287
• 50 Tucker MJ, Liebermann J. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK: Informa; 2007
• 51 Mazur P. Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys 1990; 17 (1) 53-92
• 52 Schneider U. Cryobiological principles of embryo freezing. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986; Feb;3 (1) 3-9
• 53 Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J , et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril 1986; 46 (2) 268-272
• 54 Leibo SP. A one-step in situ dilution method for frozen-thawed bovine embryos. Cryo Lett 1983; 4: 387-400
• 55 Fahy GM, MacFarlane DR, Angell CA, Meryman HT. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology 1984; 21 (4) 407-426
• 56 Reed ML, Said A-H, Thompson DJ, Caperton CL. Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;
• 57 Yavin S, Arav A. Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology 2007; 67 (1) 81-89
• 58 Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983; 305 (5936) 707-709
• 59 Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril 1985; 44 (5) 645-651
• 60 Fahy GM, Rall WF. Vitrification: an overview. Tucker MJ, Liebermann J, , eds. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK: Informa; 2007
• 61 Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature 1985; 313 (6003) 573-575
• 62 Rall WF. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 1987; 24 (5) 387-402
• 63 Kola I, Kirby C, Shaw J, Davey A, Trounson A. Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploid zygotes and malformed fetuses. Teratology 1988; 38 (5) 467-474
• 64 Quinn P, Kerin JFP. Experience with the cryopreservation of human embryos using the mouse as a model to establish successful techniques. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1986; 3 (1) 40-45
• 65 Kuzan FB, Quinn P. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. In: Wolf DP, , ed. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. A Manual of Basic Technique. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1988
• 66 Trounson A, Sjöblom P. Cleavage and development of human embryos in vitro after ultrarapid freezing and thawing. Fertil Steril 1988; 50 (2) 373-376
• 67 Ali J, Shelton JN. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99 (2) 471-477
• 68 Martino A, Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod 1996; 54 (5) 1059-1069
• 69 Kuwayama M, Hamano S, Nagai T. Vitrification of bovine blastocysts obtained by in vitro culture of oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96 (1) 187-193
• 70 Kasai M, Komi JH, Takakamo A, Tsudera H, Sakurai T, Machida T. A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 89 (1) 91-97
• 71 Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (12) 3077-3079
• 72 Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (12) 3434-3440
• 73 Arav A. Vitrification of oocyte and embryos. In: Lauria A, Gandolfi F, , eds. New Trends in Embryo Transfer. Cambridge, UK: Portland Press; 1992: 255-264
• 74 Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12 (6) 779-796
• 75 AbdelHafez F, Xu J, Goldberg J, Desai N. Vitrification in open and closed carriers at different cell stages: assessment of embryo survival, development, DNA integrity and stability during vapor phase storage for transport. BMC Biotechnol 2011; 11: 29
• 76 Valbuena D, Póo ME, Aguilar-Gallardo C , et al. Comparison of Cryotip vs. Cryotop for mouse and human blastomere vitrification. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (1) 209-217
• 77 Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (1) 19-26
• 78 Edgar DH, Archer J, McBain J, Bourne H. Embryonic factors affecting outcome from single cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (6) 718-723
• 79 Surrey E, Keller J, Stevens J, Gustofson R, Minjarez D, Schoolcraft W. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (3) 411-417
• 80 Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21 (3) 270-274
• 81 Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA , et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (1) 186-193
• 82 AbdelHafez FF, Desai N, Abou-Setta AM, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (2) 209-222
• 83 Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (4) 1061-1066
• 84 Jones Jr HW, Jones D, Kolm P. Cryopreservation: a simplified method of evaluation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (3) 548-553
• 85 Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (1) 84-88
• 86 Noyes N, Reh A, McCaffrey C, Tan O, Krey L. Impact of developmental stage at cryopreservation and transfer on clinical outcome of frozen embryo cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19 (Suppl. 03) 9-15
• 87 Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 344-348
• 88 Beier HM, Beckman JO. German Embryo Protection Act: Gesetz zum Schutz von Embryonen (Embryonenshutzgesetz-EschG). Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 605-606
• 89 Germond M, Senn A. A law affecting medically assisted procreation is on the way in Switzerland. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16 (7) 341-343
• 90 Fugger EF, Bustillo M, Katz LP, Dorfmann AD, Bender SD, Schulman JD. Embryonic development and pregnancy from fresh and cryopreserved sibling pronucleate human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1988; 50 (2) 273-278
• 91 Horne G, Critchlow JD, Newman MC, Edozien L, Matson PL, Lieberman BA. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (3) 542-547
• 92 Senn A, Vozzi C, Chanson A, De Grandi P, Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage. Fertil Steril 2000; 74 (5) 946-952
• 93 Queenan Jr JT, Veeck LL, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. Cryopreservation of all prezygotes in patients at risk of severe hyperstimulation does not eliminate the syndrome, but the chances of pregnancy are excellent with subsequent frozen-thaw transfers. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (7) 1573-1576
• 94 Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a “freeze-all” strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (6) 2029-2033 , 2033.e1
• 95 Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Fortini D, Selman HA, Feliciani E. Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (6) 1457-1460
• 96 Damario MA, Hammitt DG, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn infant from a single oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (4) 767-773
• 97 Marrs RP, Greene J, Stone BA. Potential factors affecting embryo survival and clinical outcome with cryopreserved pronuclear human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (6) 1766-1771 , discussion 1771–1772
• 98 Macas E, Imthurn B, Borsos M, Rosselli M, Maurer-Major E, Keller PJ. Impairment of the developmental potential of frozen-thawed human zygotes obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (4) 630-635
• 99 Damario MA, Hammitt DG, Galanits TM, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril 1999; 72 (6) 1049-1054
• 100 Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994; 9 (9) 1743-1748
• 101 Beyer DA, Amari F, Diedrich K, Al Hasani S. Embryo survival after vitrification of 2 PN oocytes. Mid East Fertil Soc 2011; 16: 45-49
• 102 Al-Hasani S, Ozmen B, Koutlaki N, Schoepper B, Diedrich K, Schultze-Mosgau A. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing?. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (3) 288-293
• 103 Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11 (5) 608-614
• 104 Edgar DH, Bourne H, Speirs AL, McBain JC. A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (1) 175-179
• 105 Prades M, Golmard J-L, Schubert B, Poirot C. Embryo cryopreservation: proposal for a new indicator of efficiency. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 577-82.e1 , 2
• 106 Hartshorne GM, Wick K, Elder K, Dyson H. Effect of cell number at freezing upon survival and viability of cleaving embryos generated from stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 1990; 5 (7) 857-861
• 107 Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Mäkinen S, Karro H, Roos A, Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (9) 2368-2374
• 108 Solé M, Santaló J, Rodríguez I , et al. Correlation between embryological factors and pregnancy rate: development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation programme. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28 (2) 129-136
• 109 Guerif F, Bidault R, Cadoret V, Couet ML, Lansac J, Royere D. Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (5) 1321-1326
• 110 Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A , et al. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human day 3 embryos. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (11) 2943-2949
• 111 Nagy ZP, Taylor T, Elliott T, Massey JB, Kort HI, Shapiro DB. Removal of lysed blastomeres from frozen-thawed embryos improves implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (6) 1606-1612
• 112 Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M , et al. Developmental potential of fully intact and partially damaged cryopreserved embryos after laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres and post-thaw culture selection. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (4) 888-894
• 113 Jericho H, Wilton L, Gook DA, Edgar DH. A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (3) 568-571
• 114 Edgar DH, Karani J, Gook DA. Increasing dehydration of human cleavage-stage embryos prior to slow cooling significantly increases cryosurvival. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19 (4) 521-525
• 115 Wood MJ, Mollison J, Harrild K , et al. A pragmatic RCT of conventional versus increased concentration sucrose in freezing and thawing solutions for human embryos. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (8) 1987-1996
• 116 Fasano G, Fontenelle N, Vannin A-S , et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (2) 241-247
• 117 Cobo A, de los Santos MJ, Castellò D, Gámiz P, Campos P, Remohí J. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (5) 1138-46.e1
• 118 Desai N, Abdelhafez F, Bedaiwy MA, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Clinical pregnancy and live births after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (6) 808-813
• 119 Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B , et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (9) 1976-1982
• 120 Wilding MG, Capobianco C, Montanaro N , et al. Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27 (9–10) 549-554
• 121 Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Sun XX. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (8) 2093-2100
• 122 Guerif F, Lemseffer M, Bidault R , et al. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (5) 1051-1058
• 123 Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2007; 88 (2) 354-360
• 124 Marsh CA, Farr SL, Chang J , et al. Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001–2009. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (8) 2325-2331
• 125 Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, , eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Press; 1999: 378-388
• 126 Van Landuyt L, Stoop D, Verheyen G , et al. Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (3) 527-534
• 127 Goto S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M. Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (3) 948-952
• 128 Honnma H, Baba T, Sasaki M , et al. Trophectoderm morphology significantly affects the rates of ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage in frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (2) 361-367
• 129 Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Verheyen G, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (10) 2939-2945
• 130 Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (1) 20-26
• 131 Liebermann J. Vitrification: a simple and successful method for cryostorage of human blastocysts. In: Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H, , eds. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Springer; 2015: 305-319
• 132 Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Hennessy S, James AN, Yauger BJ, Larsen FW. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (6) 2138-2143
• 133 Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (12) 3246-3252
• 134 Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Kinutani M, Kinutani K. Blastocoele collapse by micropipetting prior to vitrification gives excellent survival and pregnancy outcomes for human day 5 and 6 expanded blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (12) 2884-2888
• 135 Cohen J, Simons RF, Edwards RG, Fehilly CB, Fishel SB. Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1985; 2 (2) 59-64
• 136 Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?. Hum Reprod Update 1997; 3 (4) 367-382
• 137 Ménézo YJR. Blastocyst freezing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115 (Suppl. 01) S12-S15
• 138 Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki AA. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (4) 697-699
• 139 Veeck LL, Bodine R, Clarke RN , et al. High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (5) 1418-1427
• 140 Richter KS, Shipley SK, McVearry I, Tucker MJ, Widra EA. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (4) 862-866
• 141 Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (2) 389-392
• 142 Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, Yokota H, Araki Y. Birth of a healthy baby following vitrification of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (5) 1027-1029
• 143 Sansinena M, Santos MV, Zaritzky N, Chirife J. Numerical simulation of cooling rates in vitrification systems used for oocyte cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2011; 63 (1) 32-37
• 144 Roy TK, Bradley CK, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril 2014; 101 (5) 1294-1301
• 145 Hashimoto S, Amo A, Hama S, Ito K, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (6) 1528-1535
• 146 Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T , et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using CryoLoops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (2) 384-391
• 147 Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (12) 2794-2801
• 148 Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (2) 368-77.e1 , 9
• 149 Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (1) 6-9
• 150 Cohen J, Alikani M. The time has come to radically rethink assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (4) 323-324
• 151 Barnhart KT. Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (1) 1-2
• 152 Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11 (4) 434-437