Der Klinikarzt 2015; 44(2): 96-101
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1547509
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Mammakarzinom – Adjuvante und neoadjuvante Chemo- und Antikörpertherapie

Breast cancer – Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and antibody therapy
Christoph Thomssen
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale
,
Michael Untch
2   Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2015 (online)

Beim nicht-metastasierten Mammakarzinom ist die konsequente adjuvante systemische Therapie der wesentliche Grund für die substantielle Verbesserung der Prognose. Die Indikation ergibt sich aus dem Rückfallrisiko und der Prädiktion des Therapieeffektes. Prognostische und prädiktive Informationen ergeben sich vor allem aus Östrogenrezeptorstatus (ER), HER2-Expression und Proliferationsrate. Bei der Chemotherapie kommen Anthrazykline, Taxane und Cyclophosphamid zum Einsatz. Dosisdichte Therapien mit verkürzten Therapieintervallen – durch primäre Gabe von G-CSF ermöglicht – haben eine höhere Effektivität bei ähnlicher Toxizität und werden heute vielfach bevorzugt. Die Therapie mit dem anti HER2-Antikörper Trastuzumab über ein Jahr ist Standard bei HER2-positiver Erkrankung. ER-positive Patientinnen erhalten – unabhängig von der Chemotherapie – immer eine endokrine Therapie. Neoadjuvante Therapien ermöglichen eine Therapieanpassung und können die brusterhaltende Therapie erleichtern. Sie sind bei HER2-positiven und bei ER-negativen Karzinomen zu bevorzugen, da bei diesen Tumoren die Tumorremission mit dem rückfallfreien Überleben korreliert. Indikation und Art der (neo)adjuvanten systemischen Therapie werden individuell festgelegt.

In cases of non-metastasizing breast cancer a consequent adjuvant systemic therapy is one of the main reasons for the substantial improvements in prognosis. The indication arises from the recurrence risk and the prediction of a therapeutic effect. Prognostic and predictive information is provided above all by the estrogen receptor status (ER), HER2 expression and proliferation rate. For chemotherapy anthracyclines, taxanes and cyclophosphamide are available for use. Densely dosed therapies with shortened therapy intervals made possible by the primary administration of G-CSF, exhibit a higher efficacy with comparable toxicity and are thus preferred in many cases. Therapy with the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab for one year is now the standard for HER2-positive disease. ER-positive patients, irrespective of their chemotherapy, should always receive an endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant therapies pave the way for therapy adaptations and can facilitate breast-preserving therapies. They are to be preferred for HER2-positive and ER-negative cancers, since tumor remission correlates with relapse-free survival for these tumor types. The indication for and type of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy is selected on an individual basis.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie der AWMF, Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft e.V. und Deutschen Krebshilfe e.V. AWMF-Register-Nummer (032 – 045OL). April 2012. Statement Adj 2.
  • 2 AGO Breast Committee. Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Recommendations 2014. http://www.ago-online.de download 8.12.2014
  • 3 Hofmann D, Nitz U, Gluz O et al. WSG ADAPT – adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer: study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized, investigator initiated phase II/III trial. Trials 2013; 14: 261-261
  • 4 von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD et al. Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3623-3630
  • 5 von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Nuesch E et al. Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 125: 145-156
  • 6 Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 2014; 384: 164-172
  • 7 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 379: 432-444
  • 8 Schlitt A, Jordan K, Vordermark D et al. Kardiotoxizität onkologischer Therapien. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 161-168
  • 9 Jones S, Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy J et al. Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1177-1183
  • 10 Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al. Breast Cancer International Research Group. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1273-1283
  • 11 Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1431-1439
  • 12 Cognetti F, Bruzzi P, De Placido S et al. Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by paclitaxel (T) versus fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by T, all given every 3 weeks or 2 weeks, in node-positive early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). Final results of the gruppo Italiano mammella (GIM)-2 randomized phase III study. Vortrag San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2013;
  • 13 Budd GT, Barlow WE, Moore HCF et al. S0221: Comparison of two schedules of paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (suppl; abstr CRA1008) 2013; 31
  • 14 Moebus VJ, Jackisch C, Lueck HJ et al. Intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide compared with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer: mature results of an AGO-phase-III study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2874-2880
  • 15 NCCN Guidelines. http://www.nccn.org Version 2.2014; download 15.3. 2014
  • 16 Moja L, Tagliabue L, Balduzzi S et al. Trastuzumab containing regimens for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD 006243 2012; 4
  • 17 Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 25-32
  • 18 Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Dang CT et al. A phase II study of adjuvant paclitaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H) (APT trial) for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Vortrag San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2013;
  • 19 Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al. Breast Cancer International Research Group. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1273-1283
  • 20 Jones SE, Collea R, Paul D et al. Adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-amplified early stage breast cancer: a single-group, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 1121-1128
  • 21 von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 747-756
  • 22 Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM et al. Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 13-21
  • 23 Hurley J, Reis IM, Rodgers SE et al. The use of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer that is triple negative: retrospective analysis of 144 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138: 783-794
  • 24 Cameron D, Brown J, Dent R et al. Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 933-942