Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29(02): 110-121
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549050
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reduction and Mastopexy of the Reconstructed Breast: Special Considerations in Free Flap Reconstruction

Sarosh N. Zafar
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Warren A. Ellsworth IV
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 April 2015 (online)

Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction is capable of creating a breast that closely resembles a natural breast. Reduction and mastopexy in this type of reconstruction yields several challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. Revision surgery is common to achieve symmetry; however, reduction, mastopexy, and other revision techniques are sparse in the current literature. Often, these techniques are passed from mentor to student during plastic surgery training or are learned with experience in managing one's own patients. Reviewing anatomical principles unique to this subset of patients is essential. We must also consider factors unique to this group including the effects of delayed reconstruction, radiation, skin paddle size, and flap volume. In this article, the authors describe some of the common principles used by experienced reconstructive surgeons to perform reduction and mastopexy in autologous breast reconstruction to achieve a natural, aesthetically pleasing breast reconstruction. In addition, they have included several case examples to further illustrate these principles.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nahabedian MY. Breast deformities and mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (4) 91e-102e
  • 2 Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (4) 642e-656e
  • 3 Rohrich RJ, Thornton JF, Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Grünert JG. The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (6) 1622-1630
  • 4 Hall-Findlay EJ. The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (6) 1632-1642
  • 5 Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (2) 455-462
  • 6 Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part II—Breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 794-805
  • 7 O'Dey Dm, Prescher A, Pallua N. Vascular reliability of nipple-areola complex-bearing pedicles: an anatomical microdissection study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (4) 1167-1177
  • 8 Jensen JA, Lin JH, Kapoor N, Giuliano AE. Surgical delay of the nipple-areolar complex: a powerful technique to maximize nipple viability following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (10) 3171-3176
  • 9 Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM , et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (6) 1617-1628
  • 10 Moskovitz MJ, Muskin E, Baxt SA. Outcome study in liposuction breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (1) 55-60 , discussion 61
  • 11 Ellsworth WA, Reece GP, Friedman JD. Safety and efficacy of suction-assisted lipectomy on irradiated skin and subcutaneous tissue. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (4) 442-445
  • 12 Millard DR. The Principles and Art of Plastic Surgery. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co; 1957