Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2015; 47(02): 80-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550004
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Therapieentscheidung bei Klasse-I-Borderline-Fällen: Extraktion versus Non-Extraktion

Therapeutic Decision in Class I Borderline Cases: Extraction vs. Non-Extraction
A. Kompacher
1   Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
,
B. Wendl
1   Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
,
M. Pichelmayer
1   Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
,
F. Weiland
1   Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 July 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Entscheidung zur Extraktionstherapie bei Klasse-I-Grenzfällen ist oft sehr schwierig zu treffen bzw. wird von verschiedenen Faktoren beeinflusst.

In dieser Arbeit werden mittels Literaturrecherche unterschiedliche Aspekte zur Extraktionstherapie dargestellt. Dabei werden die häufigsten Extraktionsgründe und Extraktionsmuster, das Auftreten von Wurzelresorptionen, Behandlungserfolge, Zahnbogenveränderungen sowie der Einfluss einer Extraktionstherapie auf die Dauer der Behandlung, der Kondylenposition, mögliche Profil- und Weichteilveränderungen diskutiert. Auch der Zusammenhang zwischen Extraktionstherapie und der Impaktierung von Weisheitszähnen, der Stabilität und des Auftretens eines Frontzahnrezidivs wird erläutert.

Abstract

The decision for an extraction treatment in Class I borderline cases is sometimes difficult and is influenced by many factors.

In this review article different aspects of extraction treatment are presented. The most frequent reasons will be discussed, as well as the occurrence of root resorptions, success of treatment, dental arch changes, influence of extraction on the duration of orthodontic treatment, condylar position and effects on profile and soft tissue changes. Moreover the relation between extraction treatment and third molar impaction rate, stability and the tendency of incisor relapse is explained.

Schlüsselwörter

Klasse I - Extraktionstherapie

Key words

Class I - extraction treatment
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P et al. Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4: 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Carey CW. Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 149-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ et al. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 672-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan, in Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Mosby; St. Louis: 2012. 220-275
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part 1-Interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 297-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth and fractures of the maxilla, Angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg.Co.; 1907
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 407-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Peck S, Peck H. Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 491-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C et al. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Turpin DL. Percentage swings in extraction frequencies. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part II. Analysis of clinicians stated reason for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 393-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions. Progr Orthod 2013; 14: 47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fleischer-Peters A. Therapieplanung bei Engstand unter Berücksichtigung der Wachstumssituation. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1980; 41: 385-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hirschfelder U, Boulouchou O, Müssig D et al. Einfluß des Wachstumstyps auf das Behandlungsresultat nach Extraktionstherapie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1997; 58: 154-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin CH, Short LL, Banding DW. The effects of non-extraction treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group. Aust Orthod J 2012; 28: 37-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20: 17-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Janson G, Maria FR, Bombonatti R. Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systemic review. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 386-395
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Leon-Salazar R, Janson G, Henriques JFC et al. Influence of initial occlusal severity on time and efficiency of Class I malocclusion treatment carried out with and without premolar extractions. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 38-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jung YH, Cho BH. External root resorption after orthodontic treatment: a study of contributing factors. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2011; 41: 17-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny JD et al. Orthodontic relapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S et al. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 681-685
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarelli FP et al. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 270-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Janson G, Nakamura A, Barros SE et al. Efficiency of Class I and Class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions. Journal of Applied Oral Science [online]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Artun J, Osterberg SK. Periodontal status of teeth facing extraction sites long-term after orthodontic treatment. J Periodontol 1987; 58: 24-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Türköz Ç, Ulusoy Ç. Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 572-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kim TW, Årtun J, Behbehani F et al. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extracton of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Tarazona B, Parades V, Llamas JM et al. Influence of first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e760-e766
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gianelly AA, Cozzani M, Boffa J. Condylar position and maxillary first premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 473-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Årtun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position, and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 48-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Major P, Kamelchuk L, Nebbe B et al. Condyle displacement associated with premolar extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 435-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rinchuse DJ, Busch LS, DiBagno D et al. Extraction Treatment Part1 The Extraction vs. Nonextraction debate. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 753-760
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dibbets JMH, van der Weele LT. Extraction, orthodontic treatment, and craniomandibular dysfunction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 210-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Basciftci FA, Usumez S. Effects of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment on Class I and Class II Subjects. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 36-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG et al. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 450-457
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Conley RS, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 59-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 324-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in „borderline“ class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatment on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3-10
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs. nonextraction on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 209-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Johnson DK, Smith R. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 162-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 91-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Some vertical lineaments of lip positon. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 519-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mack MR. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 478-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 948-952
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Strang R. The fallacy of denture expansion. Angle Orthod 1949; 19: 12-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Riedel RA. Review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960; 6: 179-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 359-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Glenn G, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Nonextraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 321-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Boley JC, Mark JA, Sachdeva RC et al. Longterm stability of Class I premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 277-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Picanço PR, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH et al. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 91-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Germec-Cakan D, Taner TU, Akan S. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline class I malocclusion treated with extraction or without extraction with air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 734.e1-734.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 255-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase in the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 393-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Zafarmand AH, Qamari A, Zafarmand MM. Mandibular incisor re-crowding: is it different in extraction and non-extraction cases?. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13: 669-674
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Freitas KM, des Freitas MR, Henriques JF et al. Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 480-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Canuto LFG, Freitas MR, Freitas KMS et al. Long-term stability of maxillary anterior alignment in non-extraction cases. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 46-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Canuto LF, de Freitas MR, Janson G et al. Influence of rapid expansion on maxillary incisor alignment stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 164.e1-164.e6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar