Download PDF
Semin Hear 2015; 36(03): 162-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555119
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of Aging and Cognition on Hearing Assistive Technology Use

Lindsey E. Jorgensen
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota
,
Jessica J. Messersmith
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 July 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Many factors go into appropriate recommendation and use of hearing assistive technology (HAT). The aging auditory system presents with its own complications and intricacies; there are many types of age-related hearing loss, and it is possible that the underlying cause of hearing loss can significantly impact the recommendations and performance with HATs. The audiologist should take into consideration peripheral and central auditory function when selecting HATs for the aging adult population as well as when selecting appropriate types of technology including personal sound amplification products, hearing aids, cochlear implants, and other assistive technology. The cognitive ability of the patient plays a central role in the recommendations of HAT. It is possible that the use of HATs could mitigate some of the effects of cognitive decline and thus should be considered as early as possible. Assessment of ability and appropriate recommendations are crucial to consistent use of HAT devices.

Keywords

Hearing loss - hearing aids - cochlear implants - hearing assistive technology - cognition - adults
 

  • References

  • 1 Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS , et al; The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148 (9) 879-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schuknecht HF. Prebycusis. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 402-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schuknecht HF. Further observations on the pathology of presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80: 369-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schuknecht H. Presbyacusis. Pathology of the Ear. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Humes LE. The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (7) 590-603
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Otto WC, McCandless GA. Aging and the auditory brain stem response. Audiology 1982; 21 (6) 466-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council (CHABA). Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 83 (3) 859-895
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Madden JP, Feth LL. Temporal resolution in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using frequency-modulated stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35 (2) 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tyler RS, Summerfield Q, Wood EJ, Fernandes MA. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72 (3) 740-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Karlin J. A factorial study of auditory function. Psychometrika 1942; 7: 251-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7 (3) 183-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Oxenham AJ, Plack CJ. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101 (6) 3666-3675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Plack CJ, Drga V, Lopez-Poveda EA. Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115 (4) 1684-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Food and Drug Administration. Hearing aids and personal sound amplifiers: know the difference. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm185459.htm . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: regulatory requirements for hearing aid devices and personal sound amplification products. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm127086.htm . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Alexander J. 20q: the highs and lows of frequency lowering amplification. Audiology 2013. Available at: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/20q-frequency-lowering-whole-shebang-11913 . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 AAA Task Force. Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. 2006. Available at: http://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/haguidelines.pdf_53994876e92e42.70908344.pdf . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 AAA Task Force. American Academy of Audiology clinical practice guidelines pediatric amplification. 2013. Available at: http://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/PediatricAmplificationGuidelines.pdf_539975b3e7e9f1.74471798.pdf . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 American Speech Language and Hearing Association. Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. 1998. Available at: http://www.asha.org/policy/GL1998-00012/ . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, Clarrett DM, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore) 2012; 91 (5) 229-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH , et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59 (3) 446-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (8 Pt 1) 1482-1488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wargo M, Lisbona K, Jorgensen L, Cambron N, Messersmith J. Cochlear Implant Performance in the Veteran Population. Orlando, FL: American Academy of Audiology; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Larsby B, Hällgren M, Lyxell B. The interference of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impaired subjects. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (Suppl. 02) S83-S90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Promotion OoDPaH. Healthy people 2020. 2010. Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/ . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 2011; 68 (2) 214-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kochkin S. Marketrak viii: 25 year trends in the hearing healthcare market. Hearing Review 2009; 16 (11)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Amlani A. Will federal subsidies increase the US hearing aid market penetration?. Audiology Today 2010; 22 (3) 40-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (20) 1851-1852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lin FR, Thorpe R, Gordon-Salant S, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66 (5) 582-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 (NIDCD) NIoDaOCD. Cochlear implants. Available at: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/pages/coch.aspx . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kricos PB, Lesner SA, Sandridge SA. Expectations of older adults regarding the use of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1991; 2 (3) 129-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dengerink J, Porter J. Children's attitudes towards peers wearing hearing aids. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1984; 15: 205-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Silverman FH, Klees J. Adolescents' attitudes toward peers who wear visible hearing aids. J Commun Disord 1989; 22 (2) 147-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Iler KL, Danhauer JL, Mulac A. Peer perceptions of geriatrics wearing hearing aids. J Speech Hear Disord 1982; 47 (4) 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Johnson C, Danhauer J. Attitudes towards severely hearing impaired geriatrics with and without hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1982; 4: 41-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mulac A, Danhauer J, Johnson C. Young adults' and peers' attitudes towards elderly hearing aid wearers. Aust J Audiol 1983; 5 (2) 57-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rauterkus EP, Palmer CV. The hearing aid effect in 2013. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25 (9) 893-903
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kochkin S, Rogin C. Quantifying the obvious: The impact of hearing instruments on quality of life. Hearing Review 2000; 7 (1) 8-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Palmer CV, Adams SW, Bourgeois M, Durrant J, Rossi M. Reduction in caregiver-identified problem behaviors in patients with Alzheimer disease post-hearing-aid fitting. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (2) 312-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Discriminating and responsiveness abilities of two hearing handicap scales. Ear Hear 1990; 11 (3) 176-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Granick S, Kleban MH, Weiss AD. Relationships between hearing loss and cognition in normally hearing aged persons. J Gerontol 1976; 31 (4) 434-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gussekloo J, de Craen AJ, Oduber C, van Boxtel MP, Westendorp RG. Sensory impairment and cognitive functioning in oldest-old subjects: the Leiden 85+ Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 13 (9) 781-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Jorgensen L, Palmer C, Fischer G. Evaluation of hearing status at the time of dementia diagnosis. Audiology Today 2014; 26 (1) 38-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, An Y, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM. Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Neuropsychology 2011; 25 (6) 763-770
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Ohta RJ, Carlin MF, Harmon BM. Auditory acuity and performance on the mental status questionnaire in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29 (10) 476-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Rees TS, Koepsell TD, Duckert LG. Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. JAMA 1989; 261 (13) 1916-1919
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J , et al; Health ABC Study Group. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173 (4) 293-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Valentijn SA, van Boxtel MP, van Hooren SA , et al. Change in sensory functioning predicts change in cognitive functioning: results from a 6-year follow-up in the Maastricht aging study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (3) 374-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Leake PA, Hradek GT, Snyder RL. Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness. J Comp Neurol 1999; 412 (4) 543-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Leake PA, Stakhovskaya O, Hetherington A, Rebscher SJ, Bonham B. Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and electrical stimulation on survival and function of cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in deafened, developing cats. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2013; 14 (2) 187-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Lin FR. Hearing loss in older adults: who's listening?. JAMA 2012; 307 (11) 1147-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Blood G, Blood I, Danhauer J. The hearing aid effect. Hearing Instruments 1977; 28: 12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kochkin S. Marketrak viii: the key influencing factors in hearing aid purchase intent. Hearing Review 2012; 3: 20-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Fischer ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Klein BE, Klein R, Tweed TS. Determinants of hearing aid acquisition in older adults. Am J Public Health 2011; 101 (8) 1449-1455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Hartley D, Rochtchina E, Newall P, Golding M, Mitchell P. Use of hearing aids and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (10) 642-653
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Kalluri S, Humes LE. Hearing technology and cognition. Am J Audiol 2012; 21 (2) 338-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Wong LLN, Yu JKY, Chan SS, Tong MCF. Screening of cognitive function and hearing impairment in older adults: a preliminary study. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 867852
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Jorgensen L, Palmer C, Pratt S, Erickson K, Moncrieff D. The Impact of Undiagnosed Hearing Loss on the Diagnosis of Dementia: Communication Sciences and Disorders. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Tambs K. Moderate effects of hearing loss on mental health and subjective well-being: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study. Psychosom Med 2004; 66 (5) 776-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Iwashyna TJ, Christie JD. Low use of durable medical equipment by chronically disabled elderly. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 33 (3) 324-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Alzheimer's Association and National Alliance for Caregiving. Families care: Alzheimer's caregiving in the United States. In: Alzheimer's' Association and National Alliance for Caregiving, Ed. Alzheimer's Association. Chicago, IL. 2004. Available at: https://www.alz.org/national/documents/report_familiescare.pdf . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Office for National Statistics. Focus on Older people. Soule A, Babb P, Evandrou M, Balchin S, Zealey L, , Eds. National Statistics under the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Newport, UK 2005. Available at: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ons.gov.uk%2Fons%2Frel%2Fmortality-ageing%2Ffocus-on-older-people%2F2005-edition%2Ffocus-on-older-people.pdf&ei=HjNvVZarNoOesAXvioGYBA&usg=AFQjCNHyLdLN9TRmR3gatI8GjGPjtJ2e5Q&sig2=lyV9eCQlZ6GzHg1ha6gG7w&bvm=bv.94911696,d.b2w . Accessed June 3, 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Schulz R, Martire LM. Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 12 (3) 240-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Palmer CV, Solodar HS, Hurley WR, Byrne DC, Williams KO. Self-perception of hearing ability as a strong predictor of hearing aid purchase. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (6) 341-347
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8 (1) 27-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 McConatha J, Huba H. Primary, secondary, and emotional control across adulthood. Curr Psychol 1999; 18 (2) 164-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Wahl H. Environmental influences on aging and behavior. In: Birren J, Schaie K, , eds. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2001: 215-237
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Stopford CL, Thompson JC, Neary D, Richardson AM, Snowden JS. Working memory, attention, and executive function in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Cortex 2012; 48 (4) 429-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Lunner T, Sundewall-Thorén E. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (7) 604-617
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (6) 600-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Hornsby BW. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (5) 523-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Mick P, Kawachi I, Lin FR. The association between hearing loss and social isolation in older adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (3) 378-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Dolan-Ash S, Schloffman JJ. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117 (3 Pt 1) 255-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Wolfe J, Schafer E. Programming Cochlear Implants. Core Clinical Concepts in Audiology series. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) Version 1.0. For Adult Cochlear Implant Users 2011. Cochlear Corporation, 2011. CD
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Shapiro WH, Bradham TS. Cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45 (1) 111-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Hughes ML, Stille LJ. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2008; 29 (3) 435-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 2004; 25 (5) 447-463
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Gross A. Fitting techniques for the pediatric cochlear implant patient. 2003. Available at: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/fitting-techniques-for-pediatric-cochlear-1128 . Accessed June 3, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Spivak LG, Chute PM. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1994; 15 (2) 184-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Spivak LG, Chute PM, Popp AL, Parisier SC. Programming the cochlear implant based on electrical acoustic reflex thresholds: patient performance. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (10) 1225-1230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants. Audiology 2000; 39 (1) 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Larson VD, Williams DW, Henderson WG , et al; NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: a crossover trial. JAMA 2000; 284 (14) 1806-1813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289 (15) 1976-1985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Seniors Research Group. The Consequences of Untreated Hearing Loss in Older Persons. Washington, DC: National Council on Aging; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N. Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (7) 921-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar