Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42(05): 541-549
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579640
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Assessment of Hemophilic Arthropathy by Ultrasound: Where Do We Stand?

Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
1   Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
2   Unit of Cell and Molecular Biology in Cardiovascular Diseases, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
,
Pasquale Ambrosino
1   Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
,
Gabriele Quintavalle
3   Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
,
Antonio Coppola
1   Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
,
Annarita Tagliaferri
3   Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
,
Carlo Martinoli
4   Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Gianna Franca Rivolta
3   Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 April 2016 (online)

Abstract

Joint hemorrhages represent the most common type of bleeding episode in persons with hemophilia, and recurrent hemarthrosis triggers chronic arthropathy, which is the most frequent chronic complication in these patients. In recent years, in the frame of a comprehensive care approach, a growing attention has been given to the periodic assessment of the joint status in hemophilia patients with the aim to identify early arthropathic changes and to prevent the development of a clinically overt arthropathy. Besides clinical examination, X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently used to evaluate joint status and to monitor the disease progression in hemophilia. Considering the limitations of X-ray and MRI, growing interest has been given to ultrasound (US) as a possible tool to assess joint status and identify early arthropathic changes in hemophilia patients. In the present review, we summarize major literature evidence on the use of joint US for the evaluation of markers of disease activity (joint effusion and synovial hypertrophy) and of degenerative damages (osteochondral changes) in patients with hemophilia. On the whole, being able to identify the presence of intra- or extra-articular fluid, US examination is the fastest and most reliable technique to identify acute conditions, such as hemarthrosis. In addition, the information on joint involvement provided by US in the patient follow-up may influence treatment decisions on a personalized basis. The use of US as part of a routine clinical examination by hemophilia experts may optimize the diagnostic workflow, avoiding additional costs and long waiting lists for patients referred to imaging departments. In the frame of a comprehensive care approach, US might represent a strategy to early detect and monitor synovial hypertrophy and osteochondral changes in hemophilia, thus extending the clinical examination and helping identify joints to be studied with a second-level examination such as MRI.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bolton-Maggs PH, Pasi KJ. Haemophilias A and B. Lancet 2003; 361 (9371) 1801-1809
  • 2 Dalyan M, Tuncer S, Kemahli S. Hemophilic arthropathy: evaluation of clinical and radiological characteristics and disability. Turk J Pediatr 2000; 42 (3) 205-209
  • 3 Luck Jr JV, Silva M, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Ghalambor N, Zahiri CA, Finn RS. Hemophilic arthropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12 (4) 234-245
  • 4 Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Jimenez-Yuste V, Aznar JA , et al. Joint protection in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2011; 17 (Suppl. 02) 1-23
  • 5 Gilbert MS. Prophylaxis: musculoskeletal evaluation. Semin Hematol 1993; 30 (3) (Suppl. 02) 3-6
  • 6 Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (149) 153-159
  • 7 Tusell JM, Aznar JA, Querol F, Quintana M, Moreno M, Gorina E ; Orthopaedic Study Group. Results of an orthopaedic survey in young patients with severe haemophilia in Spain. Haemophilia 2002; 8 (Suppl. 02) 38-42
  • 8 Di Minno MN, Ambrosino P, Franchini M, Coppola A, Di Minno G. Arthropathy in patients with moderate hemophilia a: a systematic review of the literature. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (7) 723-731
  • 9 Colvin BT, Astermark J, Fischer K , et al; Inter Disciplinary Working Group. European principles of haemophilia care. Haemophilia 2008; 14 (2) 361-374
  • 10 Martinoli C, Della Casa Alberighi O, Di Minno G , et al. Development and definition of a simplified scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost 2013; 109 (6) 1170-1179
  • 11 Feldman BM, Funk SM, Bergstrom BM , et al. Validation of a new pediatric joint scoring system from the International Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study Group: validity of the hemophilia joint health score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (2) 223-230
  • 12 Oymak Y, Yildirim AT, Yaman Y , et al. The effectiveness of tools for monitoring hemophilic arthropathy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015; 37 (2) e80-e85
  • 13 Nijdam A, Bladen M, Hubert N , et al. Using routine Haemophilia Joint Health Score for international comparisons of haemophilia outcome: standardization is needed. Haemophilia 2016; 22 (1) 142-147
  • 14 Cross S, Vaidya S, Fotiadis N. Hemophilic arthropathy: a review of imaging and staging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2013; 34 (6) 516-524
  • 15 Doria AS. State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia 2010; 16 (Suppl. 05) 107-114
  • 16 Kilcoyne RF, Nuss R. Radiological evaluation of hemophilic arthropathy. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003; 29 (1) 43-48
  • 17 Funk MB, Schmidt H, Becker S , et al. Modified magnetic resonance imaging score compared with orthopaedic and radiological scores for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2002; 8 (2) 98-103
  • 18 Acharya SS, Schloss R, Dyke JP , et al. Power Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of hemophilic synovitis—a promising tool. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (12) 2055-2061
  • 19 Keshava SN, Gibikote S, Doria AS. Imaging Evaluation of Hemophilia: Musculoskeletal Approach. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41 (8) 880-893
  • 20 Querol F, Rodriguez-Merchan EC. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the musculo-skeletal problems of haemophilia. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3) e215-e226
  • 21 Zukotynski K, Jarrin J, Babyn PS , et al. Sonography for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy in children: a systematic protocol. Haemophilia 2007; 13 (3) 293-304
  • 22 Kidder W, Nguyen S, Larios J, Bergstrom J, Ceponis A, von Drygalski A. Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound is critical for the diagnosis of hemarthroses, inflammation and soft tissue abnormalities in adult patients with painful haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2015; 21 (4) 530-537
  • 23 Klukowska A, Czyrny Z, Laguna P, Brzewski M, Serafin-Krol MA, Rokicka-Milewska R. Correlation between clinical, radiological and ultrasonographical image of knee joints in children with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2001; 7 (3) 286-292
  • 24 Melchiorre D, Linari S, Innocenti M , et al. Ultrasound detects joint damage and bleeding in haemophilic arthropathy: a proposal of a score. Haemophilia 2011; 17 (1) 112-117
  • 25 Muça-Perja M, Riva S, Grochowska B, Mangiafico L, Mago D, Gringeri A. Ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3) 364-368
  • 26 Wilson DJ, McLardy-Smith PD, Woodham CH, MacLarnon JC. Diagnostic ultrasound in haemophilia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69 (1) 103-107
  • 27 Ceponis A, Wong-Sefidan I, Glass CS, von Drygalski A. Rapid musculoskeletal ultrasound for painful episodes in adult haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (5) 790-798
  • 28 Robertson JD, Connolly B, Hilliard P, Wedge J, Babyn P, Carcao M. Acute haemarthrosis of the hip joint: rapid convalescence following ultrasound-guided needle aspiration. Haemophilia 2009; 15 (1) 390-393
  • 29 Beyer R, Ingerslev J, Sørensen B. Current practice in the management of muscle haematomas in patients with severe haemophilia. Haemophilia 2010; 16 (6) 926-931
  • 30 Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Bianchi-Zamorani M, Valle M. Ultrasound of the joints. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (1) 56-61
  • 31 Aznar JA, Pérez-Alenda S, Jaca M , et al. Home-delivered ultrasound monitoring for home treatment of haemarthrosis in haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2015; 21 (2) e147-e150
  • 32 Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS , et al; International Prophylaxis Study Group. Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2005; 11 (2) 109-115
  • 33 Di Minno MN, Iervolino S, Soscia E , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of “healthy” joints in young subjects with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (3) e167-e173
  • 34 Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Haemophilic synovitis: basic concepts. Haemophilia 2007; 13 (Suppl. 03) 1-3
  • 35 Mainardi CL, Levine PH, Werb Z, Harris Jr ED. Proliferative synovitis in hemophilia: biochemical and morphologic observations. Arthritis Rheum 1978; 21 (1) 137-144
  • 36 Roosendaal G, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, De Kleijn P , et al. Synovium in haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 1998; 4 (4) 502-505
  • 37 Convery FR, Woo SL, Akeson WH, Amiel D, Malcom LL. Experimental hemarthrosis in the knee of the mature canine. Arthritis Rheum 1976; 19 (1) 59-67
  • 38 Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, van den Berg HM, Lafeber FP, Bijlsma JW. Cartilage damage as a result of hemarthrosis in a human in vitro model. J Rheumatol 1997; 24 (7) 1350-1354
  • 39 Doria AS, Keshava SN, Mohanta A , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204 (3) W336-47
  • 40 Sierra Aisa C, Lucía Cuesta JF, Rubio Martínez A , et al. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and follow-up of joint lesions in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (1) e51-e57
  • 41 Blobel CP, Haxaire C, Kalliolias GD, DiCarlo E, Salmon J, Srivastava A. Blood-Induced Arthropathy in Hemophilia: Mechanisms and Heterogeneity. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41 (8) 832-837
  • 42 Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS. Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response—preliminary observations. Radiology 1996; 198 (2) 582-584
  • 43 Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and prophylaxis for chronic hemophilic synovitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (343) 6-11
  • 44 Roosendaal G, Vianen ME, Wenting MJG , et al. Iron deposits and catabolic properties of synovial tissue from patients with haemophilia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (3) 540-545
  • 45 Martinoli C, Di Minno MN, Pasta G, Tagliafico A. Haemosiderin detection with Ultrasound: reality or myth?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206 (Suppl. 01) W30
  • 46 Roosendaal G, Lafeber FP. Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2006; 12 (Suppl. 03) 117-121
  • 47 Lafeber FP, Miossec P, Valentino LA. Physiopathology of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2008; l 14 (Suppl. 04) 3-9
  • 48 Valentino LA, Hakobyan N, Rodriguez N, Hoots WK. Pathogenesis of haemophilic synovitis: experimental studies on blood-induced joint damage. Haemophilia 2007; 13 (Suppl. 03) 10-13
  • 49 Valentino LA, Hakobyan N, Enockson C , et al. Exploring the biological basis of haemophilic joint disease: experimental studies. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3) 310-318
  • 50 Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG , et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43 (12) 2762-2770
  • 51 Grassi W, Lamanna G, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1999; 28 (6) 398-403
  • 52 Roosendaal G, Lafeber FPJG. Blood-induced joint damage in hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003; 29 (1) 37-42
  • 53 Björkman S, Folkesson A, Jönsson S. Pharmacokinetics and dose requirements of factor VIII over the age range 3-74 years: a population analysis based on 50 patients with long-term prophylactic treatment for haemophilia A. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 65 (10) 989-998
  • 54 Fischer K, Pouw ME, Lewandowski D, Janssen MP, van den Berg HM, van Hout BA. A modeling approach to evaluate long-term outcome of prophylactic and on demand treatment strategies for severe hemophilia A. Haematologica 2011; 96 (5) 738-743
  • 55 Coppola A, Tagliaferri A, Di Capua M, Franchini M. Prophylaxis in children with hemophilia: evidence-based achievements, old and new challenges. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38 (1) 79-94
  • 56 Martinoli C, Di Minno MN, Pasta G, Tagliafico A. Point-of-care ultrasound in haemophilic arthropathy: will the HEAD-US system supplement or replace physical examination?. Haemophilia 2016; 22 (1) 20-21
  • 57 Ng WH, Chu WC, Shing MK , et al. Role of imaging in management of hemophilic patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (5) 1619-1623
  • 58 Olivieri M, Kurnik K, Pfluger T, Bidlingmaier C. Identification and long-term observation of early joint damage by magnetic resonance imaging in clinically asymptomatic joints in patients with haemophilia A or B despite prophylaxis. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3) 369-374
  • 59 Pavlova A, Oldenburg J. Defining severity of hemophilia: more than factor levels. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (7) 702-710
  • 60 Jayandharan GR, Srivastava A. The phenotypic heterogeneity of severe hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34 (1) 128-141
  • 61 Coppola A, Franchini M, Tagliaferri A. Prophylaxis in people with haemophilia. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101 (4) 674-681
  • 62 Tagliaferri A, Feola G, Molinari AC , et al; POTTER Study Group. Benefits of prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment in adolescents and adults with severe haemophilia A: the POTTER study. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (1) 35-45
  • 63 Aledort LM, Haschmeyer RH, Pettersson H ; The Orthopaedic Outcome Study Group. A longitudinal study of orthopaedic outcomes for severe factor-VIII-deficient haemophiliacs. J Intern Med 1994; 236 (4) 391-399
  • 64 Jelbert A, Vaidya S, Fotiadis N. Imaging and staging of haemophilic arthropathy. Clin Radiol 2009; 64 (11) 1119-1128
  • 65 Foppen W, van der Schaaf IC, Fischer K. Value of routine ultrasound in detecting early joint changes in children with haemophilia using the ‘Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound’ protocol. Haemophilia 2016; 22 (1) 121-125