Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(03): 296-303
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582233
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Impact of Facial Lipofilling on Patient-Perceived Improvement in Facial Appearance and Quality of Life

Brankica Tepavcevic
1   BT-Clinic Aesthetic Surgery Center, Belgrade, Serbia
,
Djordje Radak
2   Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases “Dedinje,” Belgrade, Serbia
,
Milan Jovanovic
3   Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
,
Sandra Radak
2   Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases “Dedinje,” Belgrade, Serbia
,
Darija Kisic Tepavcevic
4   Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Institute of Epidemiology, Belgrade, Serbia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 June 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

An investigation of the effect of facial lipofilling on patient's satisfaction is a challenging and ongoing research area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of aesthetic intervention on self-perceived improvement in facial appearance and quality of life (QoL) after 1- and 6-month follow-ups. In the period from October 1, 2014, to March 1, 2015, a total of 63 consecutive subjects who underwent a facial lipofilling were included in the study. The satisfaction with facial appearance was estimated by using the Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall scale. QoL was assessed by using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms was quantified by using the Hamilton depression and anxiety rating scales. The self-esteem was assessed by Rosenberg self-esteem scale. The average Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall scale score at baseline was 45.5 ± 13.0, while this score reached values of 84.5 ± 16.2 after 1 month (Z = −6.744, p < 0.001) and 82.7 ± 12.6 after 6 months (Z = −6.545, p < 0.001) of follow-up. The mean change of Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall scale score from baseline to 1-month follow-up was 38.9 ± 21.2 and from baseline to 6-month follow-up was 37.1 ± 18.9. Statistically significant improvement in QoL at each subsequent time point, compared with those at baseline, was detected for all domains of the SF-36 except for subscales of physical functioning and pain. It has been highlighted that advanced social life was strongly associated with improvement in satisfaction with facial appearance, better self-esteem, and lower level of anxiety and depression during the period of follow-up after facial lipofilling. The results of this study supported the hypothesis that the level of self-confidence and mental health–related QoL could be significantly improved following facial lipofilling treatment.

Keywords

lipofilling - facial appearance - self-esteem - quality of life - follow-up
 

  • References

  • 1 Papadopulos NA, Kovacs L, Krammer S, Herschbach P, Henrich G, Biemer E. Quality of life following aesthetic plastic surgery: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (8) 915-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr WF, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson Jr CM. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3 (3) 198-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alsarraf R, Alsarraf NW, Larrabee Jr WF, Johnson Jr CM. Cosmetic surgery procedures as luxury goods: measuring price and demand in facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002; 4 (2) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (1) 469-480 , discussion 481–482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Klassen A, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Goodacre T. Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (4) 1209-1210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kavin T, Jagadesan AG, Venkataraman SS. Changes in quality of life and impact on patients' perception of esthetics after orthognathic surgery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4 (Suppl. 02) S290-S293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Most SP, Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr WF. Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18 (2) 119-124
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL , et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (6) 1819-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL. Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (1) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic AL. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 98e-106e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Litner JA, Rotenberg BW, Dennis M, Adamson PA. Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (2) 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lam SM, Glasgold MJ, Glasgold RA. Complementary Fat Grafting. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Buckingham ED. Fat transfer techniques: general concepts. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31 (1) 22-28
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (2) 249-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 SF-36 Health Survey (Original version) Language Recalls. Available at: http://www.qualitymetric.com
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: Nimrod Press; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6 (4) 278-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959; 32 (1) 50-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49 (7) 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Meningaud JP, Benadiba L, Servant JM, Herve C, Bertrand JC, Pelicie Y. Depression, anxiety and quality of life among scheduled cosmetic surgery patients: multicentre prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29 (3) 177-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Meningaud JP, Benadiba L, Servant JM, Herve C, Bertrand JC, Pelicier Y. Depression, anxiety and quality of life: outcome 9 months after facial cosmetic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31 (1) 46-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sarwer DB, Gibbons LM, Magee L , et al. A prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2005; 25 (3) 263-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Castle DJ, Honigman RJ, Phillips KA. Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing?. Med J Aust 2002; 176 (12) 601-604
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cole RP, Shakespeare V, Shakespeare P, Hobby JA. Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using Quality of Life indices. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (2) 117-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar