Synlett 2017; 28(15): 1984-1989
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588858
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthetic Strategies for the Modification of Diclofenac

Stephan Schmidt
a   Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Abteilung1: Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien, Richard-Willstätter-Straße 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany   Email: rudolf.schneider@bam.de
b   Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Biotechnologie, Fachgebiet für Bioanalytik, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany
,
Sven Hanelt
c   Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin (VLB) e.V., Forschungsinstitut für instrumentelle Bier- und Getränkeanalytik (FIBGA), Seestraße 13, 13353 Berlin, Germany
,
Carsten Canitz
d   Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Fachbereich Agrarwirtschaft und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Brodaer Straße 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
,
Holger Hoffmann
a   Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Abteilung1: Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien, Richard-Willstätter-Straße 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany   Email: rudolf.schneider@bam.de
e   Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Chemie, Brook-Taylor-Straße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany
,
Leif-Alexander Garbe
b   Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Biotechnologie, Fachgebiet für Bioanalytik, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany
d   Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Fachbereich Agrarwirtschaft und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Brodaer Straße 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
,
a   Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Abteilung1: Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien, Richard-Willstätter-Straße 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany   Email: rudolf.schneider@bam.de
b   Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Biotechnologie, Fachgebiet für Bioanalytik, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany
› Author Affiliations
This study was supported by Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) via the funding programme Zentrales Innovations­programm Mittelstand (ZIM, KF 2201065AJ3 and KF 2132333AJ3)
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 24 March 2017

Accepted after revision: 09 May 2017

Publication Date:
06 June 2017 (online)


Abstract

For many heterogeneous sensor applications as well as the synthesis of hapten antigens to produce antibodies, protein conjugates of the target substance are essential. A requirement is that the target substance already offers or is modified to contain a functionality that allows for coupling to a protein, that is, an amino acid residue. Ideally, to avoid shielding of the compound by the carrier protein, a sufficient distance to the protein surface should be provided. With its carboxyl function diclofenac (DCF) allows for direct binding to lysine residues after in situ synthesis of the NHS ester. One problem is that diclofenac as free acid tends to autocondensation, which results in low yields. Here we describe the ‘insertion’ of a C6 spacer via synthesis of the amide with 6-aminohexanoic acid. To carry out the reaction in solution, first the methyl ester of the amino acid had to be produced. Due to otherwise low yields and large cleaning efforts, solid-phase synthesis on Fmoc Ahx Wang resin is recommended. The crude product is mainly contaminated by cleavage products from the resin which were removed by chromatography. The structure of the highly pure hapten was completely determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Maier MP. De Corte S. Nitsche S. Spaett T. Boon N. Elsner M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014; 48: 2312
  • 2 Zhang Y. Geißen S.-U. Gal C. Chemosphere 2008; 73: 1151
    • 3a Heberer T. Reddersen K. Mechlinski A. Water Sci. Technol. 2002; 46: 81
    • 3b Ternes TA. Water Res. 1998; 32: 3245
  • 4 Saini M. Taggart MA. Knopp D. Upreti S. Swarup D. Das A. Gupta PK. Niessner R. Prakash V. Mateo R. Cuthbert RJ. Environ. Pollut. 2012; 160: 11
  • 5 Water Framework Directive; Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy.
  • 6 Rodil R. Quintana JB. Concha-Graña E. López-Mahía P. Muniategui-Lorenzo S. Prada-Rodríguez D. Chemosphere 2012; 86: 1040
  • 7 Lin C.-H. Lin M.-J. Wu C.-C. Anal. Sci. 2017; 33: 327
  • 8 Chao C.-T. Tsai H.-B. Chiang C.-K. Huang J.-W. Hung K.-Y. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 42030
  • 9 Carvalho JJ. Weller MG. Panne U. Schneider RJ. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010; 396: 2617
  • 10 Oberleitner L. Eremin SA. Lehmann A. Garbe L.-A. Schneider RJ. Anal. Methods 2015; 7: 5854
  • 11 Gärtner S. Carvalho JJ. Emmerling F. Garbe L.-A. Schneider RJ. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 2015; 36: 233
    • 12a Franek M. Kolar V. Deng A. Crooks S. Food Agric. Immunol. 1999; 11: 339
    • 12b Shelver WL. Shappell NW. Franek M. Rubio FR. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008; 56: 6609
    • 12c Liu N. Han Z. Lu L. Wang L. Ni G. Zhao Z. Wu A. Zheng X. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013; 93: 667
  • 13 Ramin S. Weller MG. J. Mol. Recognit. 2012; 25: 89
  • 14 Esteve-Turrillas FA. Parra J. Abad-Fuentes A. Agulló C. Abad-Somovilla A. Mercader JV. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010; 682: 93
  • 15 van der Heide S. Garcia Calavia P. Hardwick S. Hudson S. Wolff K. Russell DA. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015; 250: 1
  • 16 Yang F. Xu L. Zhu L. Zhang Y. Meng W. Liu R. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016; 23: 10714
  • 17 Deng A. Himmelsbach M. Zhu Q.-Z. Frey S. Sengl M. Buchberger W. Niessner R. Knopp D. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003; 37: 3422
  • 18 Huebner M. Weber E. Niessner R. Boujday S. Knopp D. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015; 1
  • 19 Harrer A. Lang R. Grims R. Braitsch M. Hawranek T. Aberer W. Vogel L. Schmid W. Ferreira F. Himly M. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: 1
    • 20a Keuchel C. Weil L. Niessner R. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 1992; 343: 143
    • 20b Lopez-Moreno R. Mercader JV. Agullo C. Abad-Somovilla A. Abad-Fuentes A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013; 11: 7361
  • 21 Reagents All standard chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). All solvents were chromatography grade. Diclofenac sodium salt, 1-N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), piperidine, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 1-hydroxybenzotriazol (HOBT), triisopropylsilane (TIS), chlorotrimethylsilane, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), 6-aminohexanoic acid (Ahx), cyclohexane, and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Fmoc Ahx Wang resin was supplied by Iris Biotech (Marktredwitz, Germany). 2-Aminoethanol and sulfuric acid (98%) were purchased from J.T. Baker (Griesheim, Germany). Piperidine was supplied by Roth (Karls­ruhe, Germany). For HPLC the following solvent compounds have been used: ammonium acetate (NH4Ac, analytical grade, 99.3%, Fischer Chemicals, Zurich, Switzerland), acetic acid glacial (AcOH, analytical reagent grade, Fischer Chemicals) and methanol (MeOH, HPLC gradient grade, J.T. Baker). For production of ultrapure water a water purification system (Milli-Q Synthesis A10, Merck Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany) was employed. Instruments HPLC-MS studies were performed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity LC system with binary pump, degasser, autosampler, column heater, and UV detector. The chromatographic separation was carried out on a Kinetex XB-C18, 2.6 μm, 150 mm × 3 mm (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) analytical LC column with UHPLC C18, 3 mm (Phenomenex) column guard. As mobile phases Milli-Q water with 10 mM NH4Ac and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid (A) and MeOH with 10 mM NH4Ac and 0.1% (v:v) AcOH (B) were used. The system was run with a flow rate of 350 μL/min and a column heater temperature of 50 °C. An elution gradient was applied, starting with 80% A for the first 3 min. Within 5 min A is reduced to 5% and maintained at this level for a further 4 min. Then A is again increased to 80% within 2 min and held for 8 min to re-equilibrate the column. 10 μL sample was injected. The mass determination was performed on an ABSciex 6500 triple quad mass spectrometer. For electrospray ionization (ESI) the positive ionization mode was selected. For purification of crude products an Agilent 1200 Series LC System was used with the same method and an identical column. 30 μL sample was injected, and fractions were collected from 12.25–12.45 min. Products were dried in a stream of nitrogen. Structure determination was made by registering 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra under standard conditions with a Bruker Avance 600 MHz NMR spectrometer operating at 600.2 MHz. The substances had been dissolved in CDCl4. Trimethylsilane was used as reference. Synthesis of 6-{[2-(2,6-Dichlorophenylamino)phenyl]acetamido}-hexanoic Acid (DCF-Ahx) 5 g of Fmoc Ahx Wang resin (degree of loading 0.3 mmol/g) were transferred to a glass column and swollen in DMF for 1 h. For optimum mixing the glass column was shaken. For Fmoc deprotection DMF/piperidine (4:1, v/v) was added and shaken for 10 min. After this time the resin was washed twice with DMF and twice with CH2Cl2. The resin was dried and transferred in an argon atmosphere. The resin was loaded with 2 g DCF (sodium salt), 806 mg of NHS, and 1.4 g DCC in 50 mL dry DMF. The reaction mixture was shaken overnight. The next day, the resin was washed four times with MeOH, twice with DMF and twice with CH2Cl2. Cleavage of the product was done by adding TFA/TIS/H2O (95:2.5:2.5, v/v/v). After 2 h reaction time, the resin was extracted once with TFA. The dry resin was washed with TFA again. The combined cleavage and extraction solutions were concentrated at 75 °C on a rotary evaporator. The resulting yellow oil was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using the mobile phase cyclohexane/EtOAc (1:1, v/v). Every fifth fraction was analyzed by HPLC–MS. The fractions which contained the desired purified product were combined and the solvent evaporated on a rotary evaporator. 138 mg (22.5%) of a white solid were obtained. Analytical Data 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.33 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.52 (m, J1 = 7.58 Hz, J2 = 7.58 Hz, J3 = 14.96 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 1.62 (m, J1 = 7.43 Hz, J2 = 7.43 Hz, J3 = 15.13 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 2.31 (t, J1 = 7.36 Hz, J2 = 7.36 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 3.25 (q, J1 = 7.11 Hz, J2 = 13.16 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 3.67 (s, 2 H, CH2), 5.85 (m, J1 = 5.22 Hz, J2 = 5.22 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.50 (dd, J1 = 1.01 Hz, J2 = 8.06 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.91 (t, J1 = 1.19 Hz, J2 = 7.42 Hz, J3 = 7.42 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.99 (m, J1 = 8.07 Hz, J2 = 8.07 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.11 (m, J1 = 1.38 Hz, J2 = 7.50 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.15 (m, J1 = 1.38 Hz, J2 = 7.50 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.33 (d, J = 8.06 Hz, 2 H, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 24.16, 26.17, 29.05, 33.64, 39.57, 40.99 (6 × CH2), 117.28, 121.48, 124.23 (3 × CHAr), 124.43 (qC), 128.05, 128.87 (2 × CHAr), 130.19 (qC), 130.73 (CHAr), 137.38, 142.79 (2 × qC), 171.55 (CO), 178.50 (COOH) ppm. Synthesis Trial for 2-Aminoethyl-2-[2-(2,6-dichlorophenylamino)phenyl]acetate 100 mg DCF (sodium salt) was dissolved in 3 mL 2-aminoethanol. Carefully 1 mL sulfuric acid was added at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h. After this time the reaction mixture was analyzed by HPLC–MS. Synthesis of DCF Methyl Ester (DCFMe) 1 g DCF (sodium salt) was dissolved in 7 mL DMF. After addition of 7 mL MeI, the reaction mixture was stirred overnight. On the next day, the solvent was removed under vacuum. The solid was suspended in EtOAc. The organic solution was washed with water three times. The organic phase was dried with MgSO4. After filtration, EtOAc was removed under vacuum. 893 mg (90%) of a yellow solid was obtained. Synthesis of Ahx Methyl Ester (AhxMe) 1 g Ahx was dissolved in 2 mL chlorotrimethylsilane. After addition of 8 mL MeOH, the reaction mixture was stirred overnight. On the next day, the solvent was removed under vacuum.
  • 22 Piccirillo G. Bochicchio B. Pepe A. Schenke-Layland K. Hinderer S. Acta Biomater. 2017; 52: 187