J Knee Surg 2016; 29(08): 639-644
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592339
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Innovative Multimodal Physical Therapy Reduces Incidence of Repeat Manipulation under Anesthesia in Post–Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Had an Initial Manipulation under Anesthesia

Morad Chughtai
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Tanner McGinn
2   Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Anil Bhave
2   Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sabahat Khan
2   Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Megha Vashist
2   Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Anton Khlopas
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

20. Juni 2016

28. Juli 2016

Publikationsdatum:
21. September 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is performed for knee stiffness following a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when nonoperative treatments fail. It is important to develop an optimal outpatient physical therapy protocol following an MUA, to avoid a repeat procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare: (1) range of motion and (2) the rate of repeat MUA in patients who either underwent innovative multimodal physical therapy (IMMPT) or standard-of-care physical therapy (standard) following an MUA after a TKA. We performed a retrospective database study of patients who underwent an MUA following a TKA between January 2013 to December 2014 (N = 57). There were 16 (28%) men and 41 (72%) women who had a mean age of 59 years (range, 32–81 years). The patients were stratified into those who underwent IMMPT (n = 22) and those who underwent standard physical therapy (n = 35). The 6-month range of motion and rate of repeat manipulation between the two cohorts was analyzed by using Student t-test and Chi-square tests. In addition, we performed a Kaplan–Meier analysis of time to repeat MUA. The IMMPT cohort had a statistically significant higher proportion of TKAs with an optimal range of motion as compared with the standard cohort. There was statistically significant lower proportion of patients who underwent a repeat MUA in the IMMPT as compared with the standard cohort. There was also a significantly lower incidence and longer time to MUA in the IMMPT cohort as compared with the standard cohort in the Kaplan–Meier analysis. The group who underwent IMMPT utilizing Astym therapy had a significantly higher proportion of patients with optimal range of motion, which implies the potential efficacy of this regimen to improve range of motion. Furthermore, the IMMPT cohort had a significantly lower proportion of repeat manipulations as compared with the standard cohort, which implies that an IMMPT approach could potentially reduce the need for a repeat MUA. These findings warrant further investigation into outcomes of different rehab approaches.