Readability of Online Sources Regarding Meniscal Tears

Abstract

Meniscal injuries are extremely common, with an incidence of 8.3 per 1,000 person/years in young, active individuals. Patients often turn to the internet to glean information about their injuries, and even to guide decision making about treatment. Much research has been done demonstrating that a reading level of eighth grade or lower is appropriate for accurately communicating written information to patients, yet medical practitioners often fail to meet this requirement. To better examine the information patients receive about meniscal injuries, we set out to evaluate the reading level and content of three commonly used search terms on the three search engines with the largest market share. The authors examined the keywords “meniscus tear,” “meniscus tear treatment,” and “knee pain meniscus” on the three highest market share search engines. The top 10 results from each search were included, and redundancies identified. Unique Web sites were evaluated for source, word count, reading level, and content including advertisements, diagrams, photographs, nonoperative and operative options, and accurate medical information. A total of 23 unique Web sites were identified in our search, including 13 public education sources, 6 academic institutions, and 4 private physicians/groups. Average grade levels of articles ranged from 9.4 to 14.2 (mean, 11.14; standard deviation [SD] 1.46), and Flesch–Kincaid reading ease scores ranged from 23.9 to 68.7 (mean, 55.31; SD, 10.11). Pages from public sources required the highest level of readability (11.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8–13.2), which was significantly higher than private (11.0, 95% CI: 9.3, 12.7]) and academic (10.9, 95% CI: 8.9–12.9), p = 0.007 and p = 0.002, respectively. Further efforts to make appropriate health information available to patients are needed.

Keywords

meniscus - readability - patient communication

• References

• 1 Jones JC, Burks R, Owens BD, Sturdivant RX, Svoboda SJ, Cameron KL. Incidence and risk factors associated with meniscal injuries among active-duty US military service members. J Athl Train 2012; 47 (01) 67-73
• 2 Church S, Keating JF. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: timing of surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (12) 1639-1642
• 3 Trotter MI, Morgan DW. Patients' use of the Internet for health related matters: a study of Internet usage in 2000 and 2006. Health Informatics J 2008; 14 (03) 175-181
• 4 Dolan G, Iredale R, Williams R, Ameen J. Consumer use of the internet for health information: a survey of primary care patients. Int J Consum Stud 2004; 28 (02) 147-153
• 5 Health Online. 2013. One in three American adults have gone online to figure out a medical condition. Published online January 15, 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ . Accessed January 2016
• 6 Weiss BD, Blanchard JS, McGee DL. , et al. Illiteracy among Medicaid recipients and its relationship to health care costs. J Health Care Poor Underserved 1994; 5 (02) 99-111
• 7 U.S. National Library of Medicine. How to write easy-to-read health materials. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html . Accessed August 15, 2016
• 8 Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (10) 2572-2580
• 9 Eltorai AE, Sharma P, Wang J, Daniels AH. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1181-1186
• 10 Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M. , et al. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine 2005; 30 (23) 2695-2700
• 11 Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, Kitay A, Roberts TR, Daluiski A. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (09) 1881-1887
• 12 Duncan IC, Kane PW, Lawson KA, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC. Evaluation of information available on the Internet regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (06) 1101-1107
• 13 Shah AK, Yi PH, Stein A. Readability of orthopaedic oncology-related patient education materials available on the Internet. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23 (12) 783-788
• 14 Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, McCarthy MM, Roberts TR, Daluiski A. Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?. Hand (NY) 2012; 7 (04) 420-425
• 15 Labovitch RS, Bozic KJ, Hansen E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (01) 1-5
• 16 Fabricant PD, Dy CJ, Patel RM, Blanco JS, Doyle SM. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 2013; 33 (04) 361-365
• 17 Heap JC, Dezfuli B, Bennett DM, Chapman E, DeSilva GL. The internet as a source of information for De Quervain's tendinitis. Hand (NY) 2015; 10 (01) 131-136
• 18 comScore February 2016 US Desktop Search Engine Rankings. comScore, Reston VA. Available at: https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Releases-February-2016-US-Desktop-Search-Engine-Rankings . Accessed March 2016