Keywords
iliac osteocutaneous flap - superficial circumflex iliac artery - fabricated chimeric
flap - foot and ankle - complex bone defect
In the foot and ankle region, the use of vascularized bone flaps is usually adequate
for managing complex bone defects.[1] Flaps from various donor sites, such as the fibula, deep circumflex iliac artery–iliac
crest, and medial femoral condyle, have been explored,[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] with each type of flap showing positive and negative characteristics. More work
is needed to identify an ideal donor site that can improve functional and aesthetic
results and decrease donor-site morbidity.
The use of free superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) iliac osteocutaneous flaps
has been described for several decades.[8] However, such flaps can be bulky, a drawback, which in combination with the small
diameter of the SCIA, the variations that exist in pedicle anatomy, and the inadequate
supply of blood to bone, has limited their widespread use for long bone reconstruction.
As understanding of the blood supply by SCIA to the skin and iliac bone has improved
and the use of a perforator flap has become accepted, most of the above disadvantages
can now be overcome. Recently, a free iliac osseous flap based on the periosteal branch
of the SCIA was used in a case of maxillary reconstruction.[9] We previously described performing hand reconstruction using an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous
flap.[10] Compared with other vascularized bone flaps, this type of flap is less invasive
and less bulky. Additionally, this type of flap requires only a small volume of the
iliac segment and is taken from an area with thin skin. Although SCIA iliac osteocutaneous
flaps have several characteristics that are attractive for treating foot and ankle
bone defects, their use for such purposes has not been reported to date.
In cases of extensive injury, a single osteocutaneous flap cannot easily cover an
irregularly shaped, three-dimensional defect. In addition, when a potential recipient
vessel is located far from a wound, the use of an osteocutaneous flap for microvascular
anastomosis may be inadequate due to insufficient pedicle length. A combined flap
may be necessary in these circumstances. Compared with other combination flaps, microsurgically
fabricated chimeric osteocutaneous flaps can provide more tissue with better function.[11] However, few studies on the use of fabricated chimeric osteocutaneous flaps for
the reconstruction of complex bone defects in the foot and ankle region have been
reported.
In this article, we reported our single-center experience of using an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous
or a fabricated chimeric SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flap for foot and ankle reconstruction.
Patients and Methods
Following approval by the institutional review board of the Weifang 89th Hospital,
a retrospective review was performed to assess operative outcomes of patients who
underwent foot and ankle reconstruction using an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flap between
2010 and 2015. Patients treated with other flap reconstruction or amputation were
excluded. All procedures and examinations were performed by the same experienced surgeon.
No cases were lost to follow-up. Plain radiographs were obtained at each visit. Foot
function was measured based on American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot
score.[12] The AOFAS score rates pain, function, and alignment using four grading scales (ankle–hindfoot,
midfoot, hallux metatarsophalangeal–interphalangeal, and lesser metatarsophalangeal–interphalangeal
scales), each of which has 100 possible points. Each patient's aesthetic satisfaction
regarding the skin paddle was also evaluated using a self-reported visual analog scale
(VAS) score with a range of 0 to 10, with 10 indicating maximum satisfaction and 0
indicating minimum satisfaction. The scores were categorized as poor (0–2), fair (3–5),
good (6–8), or excellent (9–10).[13] Data for etiology, reconstructed site, flap component, size of graft, recipient
vessel, complications, and outcome were collected.
Surgical Procedures
Flap Design
Flap design was chosen based on defect complexity, wound size, and recipient vessel
status. Before surgery, a handheld Doppler probe was used to confirm the course of
the SCIA and the locations of the perforators and periosteal branch of the deep branch
of the SCIA. If there was ambiguity, the surgical plan was changed. Each flap was
centered along the course of the deep branch of the SCIA and included at least one
perforator. The medial border of the flap was placed lateral to the femoral triangle,
and its lateral border could extend beyond the anterior–superior iliac spine ([Fig. 1A]). A pinch test was performed to confirm primary closure of the donor site. For patients
who underwent surgery to create a combined anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, the ALT
flap was designed from the ipsilateral side ([Fig. 1B]).
Fig. 1 Perioperative photographs demonstrating designs for two kinds of flaps. (A) Osteocutaneous and (B) Fabricated. ASIS, anterior–superior iliac spine; FA, femoral artery; P, perforator.
Operative Technique
Thorough debridement was performed, and soft-tissue defect dimensions were measured.
Recipient vessels were first isolated to confirm their patency and estimate pedicle
length. Next, an incision was made from the superior border of the skin paddle to
the anterior–superior iliac spine. In most cases, a superficial vein was identified
and preserved. The subcutaneous tissue was subsequently divided superiorly and inferiorly
until the periosteal branch of the SCIA was observed. The flap was then elevated in
the lateral-to-medial direction from above the level of the deep fascia. Cutaneous
perforators of the deep branch could usually be found 1 cm medial to the anterior–superior
iliac spine. Because these perforators often cross the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve
beneath the fascia, care was taken to avoid injuring the nerve. To protect the periosteal
branch, a 0.5-cm wide deep fascia cuff was left intact around each perforator prior
to dissection. The outer surface of the iliac crest was then exposed by dividing the
sartorius, tensor fasciae latae, and gluteus medius at their origins. Based on the
direction of the periosteal branch, the required dimension of the iliac crest was
harvested using an osteotome. Pedicle dissection was then performed in a retrograde
manner, moving toward the femoral vessels. The deep fascia was incised to obtain a
longer pedicle length and larger vessel diameter when needed ([Fig. 2A]). Occasionally, in cases where the deep branch of the SCIA ran deep into the lateral
femoral cutaneous nerve, the nerve had to be transected to preserve the continuity
of the vessels. However, before closure of the iliac donor site, the nerve could be
anastomosed if necessary. The integrity of the circulation was verified by inspecting
the bleeding sites of both the bone graft and the flap ([Video 1]). The technique used for flap inset was tailored to the individual characteristics
of each patient. The bone segment was either bridged into place or connected to the
residual bone end corresponding to the arch of the foot. Fixation with a plate and
screw was performed, and Kirschner (K) wires were used when needed. End-to-end vascular
anastomosis was then performed.
Fig. 2 Intraoperative photographs. (A) Elevated osteocutaneous flap. (B) Fabricated chimeric osteocutaneous flap. ALT, anterolateral thigh; LFCN, lateral
femoral cutaneous nerve; OC, osteocutaneous; SCIA, superficial circumflex iliac artery.
White arrow indicates distal continuation of the lateral circumflex femoral vessel.
Black arrow indicates the vessel pedicle of the osteocutaneous flap.
To create a fabricated chimeric iliac osteocutaneous flap, an ALT flap was harvested
initially in the standard manner. Most of the soft-tissue defect was first covered
with an ALT flap, and its pedicle was anastomosed with recipient vessels. Then, an
SCIA osteocutaneous flap was harvested and inset as described above. The vessel pedicle
of an SCIA osteocutaneous flap was further anastomosed to either a side branch of
the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessel or its distal continuation
([Fig. 2B]).
Results
Four patients who underwent treatment with SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flaps and eight
patients with fabricated chimeric iliac osteocutaneous flaps (combined with ALT flaps)
were identified. Of these patients, 10 were males and 2 were females. The median patient
age at the time of reconstruction was 41 years. Based on conventional anatomical definitions,
10 defects were located in the foot and 2 were located in the ankle. According to
a new subunit classification system for the foot and ankle,[14] four defects involved one subunit, three involved two subunits, and five involved
three subunits. Five patients underwent initial debridement and vacuum therapy prior
to flap coverage because of severe damage caused by high-energy trauma. The primary
tumor diagnosis was pigmented villonodular synovitis.
The iliac segment size ranged from 1 × 3 × 0.7 to 3 × 6 × 1 cm, and the skin paddle
size of the iliac osteocutaneous flaps ranged from 1 × 4 to 8 × 16 cm. The median
length of the SCIA pedicles was 5 cm (range, 3–6 cm). The ALT flap size ranged from
5 × 10 to 11 × 25 cm with a median length of the vascular conduits of 6 cm (range,
5–8 cm). All flaps were approximately 5 to 7 mm thick after primary debulking. Bone
fixation was performed with plates and screws (n = 10), K wires (n = 1), and screws (n = 1). A split-thickness skin graft was required to close one ALT donor site. The
patient demographics and the surgical details are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1
Patient demographics and functional outcomes
Patient
|
Age (y)/Sex
|
Cause
|
Reconstructed site
|
Flap components
|
Size of graft (cm)
|
Recipient vessels
|
Complications
|
Follow-up (mo)
|
Time to bone union (mo)
|
AOFAS score
|
FSVAS
|
Bone
|
Skin
|
1
|
28/M
|
Crush injury
|
L. distal fibula
|
OC
|
1 × 3 × 0.7
|
8 × 16
|
Branch of ATA, CV
|
None
|
18
|
5
|
93
|
9
|
2
|
38/M
|
Crush injury
|
L. total 3rd Mb
|
OC + ALT
|
1 × 4 × 1
|
4 × 8; 11 × 25[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
Distal portion necrosis of ALT
|
24
|
3
|
75
|
6, 4[b]
|
3
|
52/M
|
Blast injury
|
R. distal 80% of the 2nd and 3rd Mbs
|
OC + ALT
|
3 × 6 × 1
|
2 × 7; 10 × 20[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
18
|
5
|
90
|
8, 7[b]
|
4
|
44/M
|
Crush injury
|
R. subtotal 1st to 3rd Mbs
|
OC + ALT
|
2 × 8 × 1
|
3 × 6; 10 × 15[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
24
|
4
|
88
|
6, 5[b]
|
5
|
57/M
|
Crush injury
|
R. medial and intermediate cuneiform bones and base of the 1st Mb
|
OC + ALT
|
2 × 4 × 0.6
|
6 × 8; 10 × 16[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
18
|
3
|
72
|
7, 7[b]
|
6
|
37/F
|
Motor vehicle crash
|
R. 1st to 3rd Mbs
|
OC + ALT
|
2 × 4 × 0.6
|
6 × 8; 10 × 20[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
12
|
5
|
56
|
6, 8[b]
|
7
|
43/M
|
Crush injury
|
R. distal 75% of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Mbs
|
OC + ALT
|
3 × 4 × 1
|
6 × 12; 9 × 15[a]
|
DPA, superficial vein, and CV
|
None
|
24
|
4
|
65
|
7, 7[b]
|
8
|
28/M
|
Motor vehicle crash
|
R. total medial cuneiform
|
OC
|
3 × 5 × 1
|
6 × 18
|
Branch of ATA, CV
|
Marginal necrosis of OC
|
24
|
3
|
65
|
5
|
9
|
33/F
|
Oncological resection
|
R. 1st Mb
|
OC
|
1 × 4 × 1
|
3 × 5
|
DMA, CV
|
None
|
12
|
5
|
72
|
6
|
10
|
17/M
|
Motor vehicle crash
|
R. total medial and intermediate cuneiform bones
|
OC
|
3 × 4 × 0.8
|
3 × 7
|
MTA, superficial vein, and CV
|
None
|
12
|
2
|
97
|
9
|
11
|
47/M
|
Fall from height
|
L. anterior malleolus
|
OC + ALT
|
2 × 5 × 1
|
1 × 4; 5 × 10[a]
|
ATA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
18
|
5
|
62
|
6, 7[b]
|
12
|
58/M
|
Blast injury
|
R. 40% of 1st, subtotal 2nd to 5th Mbs
|
OC + ALT
|
2.5 × 7 × 1
|
5 × 14, 3 × 5; 9 × 20[a]
|
DPA, 2 CVs
|
None
|
12
|
4
|
59
|
6, 7, 7[b]
|
Abbreviations: ALT, anterolateral thigh flap; AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle
Society; ATA, anterior tibial artery; CV, concomitant vein; DMA, dorsalis metatarsal
artery; DPA, dorsalis pedis artery; F, female; FSVAS, flap satisfaction visual analog
scale; L, left; M, male; Mb, metatarsal bone; MTA, medial talar artery; OC, osteocutaneous;
R, right.
a Dimension of the ALT.
b FSVAS of the anterolateral thigh flap.
The distal portion of one ALT flap developed necrosis because of inadequate circulation
caused by thinning; this complication was resolved by creating a filleted hallux flap.
One SCIA osteocutaneous flap had to be revised 1 day after surgery because of vein
thrombosis. After the thrombus was removed, reanastomosis was performed. Marginal
necrosis occurred, which required a skin graft. However, the normal bone healing process
was not affected ([Fig. 3A] and [3B]). All other flaps survived completely. The median follow-up time was 18 months.
Nine implants were removed, and two ALT flaps were simultaneously debulked. No late
flap instability was observed. The median time to bone union was 4 months. All patients
regained full weight-bearing ability at a median time of 6 months. No stress fractures
were observed. Remodeling and hypertrophy of the transplanted iliac segment were observed
in three patients who had undergone metatarsal bone reconstruction. The patient who
underwent tumor resection showed no sign of tumor recurrence. All patients were able
to walk in normal footwear. No limitations in daily activities were reported. The
AOFAS scores and VAS satisfaction scores regarding the flap at the last follow-up
are presented in [Table 1]. The scars at the donor sites healed well without pain.
Fig. 3 A patient who sustained a total medial cuneiform bone defect. (A) Bone scintigraphy displayed viability by virtue of increased tracer uptake 11 days
after reconstruction (black arrow). (B) Lateral radiograph obtained 3 months after surgery; union is noted at the site of
arthrodesis (black arrows indicate the transplanted iliac segment).
Case Reports
Case 1
A 28-year-old male patient had been involved in a machine injury on his left ankle
and distal lower leg ([Fig. 4A] and [4B]). After fracture fixation of the distal tibia, the fibular defect was reconstructed
with the iliac segment of an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flap, and the soft tissue defect
was covered with the skin paddle of the osteocutaneous flap ([Fig. 4C]). The clinical presentation showed good contour and ankle function at 18 months
after surgery ([Fig. 4D] and [4E]).
Fig. 4 Case 1: A patient suffered complex defect on his left ankle resulting because of
a machine injury.(A) Preoperative clinical and (B) radiograph views. (C) The harvested osteocutaneous flap. (D) Appearance and (E) radiograph views after implant removal at 18 months after surgery (black arrows
indicate the transplanted iliac segment).
Case 2
A 43-year-old male patient had been involved in a traffic accident that caused a right
foot crush injury. He had lost most of the soft tissue over the dorsum of the foot,
including the distal 75% of the first, second, and third metatarsal bones ([Fig. 5A] and [5B]). The first metacarpal bone defect was reconstructed using the iliac segment of
an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flap, and the soft tissue defect was reconstructed using
an ALT flap and the skin paddle of osteocutaneous flap ([Fig. 5C]). The patient had an acceptable contour and foot function ([Fig. 5D] and [5E]).
Fig. 5 Case 2: A patient suffered extensive loss of the dorsal skin of the foot, including
most of the first, second, and third metatarsal bones, resulting because of a traffic
accident. (A) Preoperative clinical and (B) radiographic views. (C) Appearance of the foot after both flaps were inset. (D) Appearance and (E) radiograph views at 24 months after surgery. ALT, anterolateral thigh; OC, osteocutaneous.
Discussion
Previous reports have demonstrated favorable results using free vascularized osseous
flaps for the reconstruction of foot and ankle bone defects.[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] Favorable outcomes, when using this approach, are mainly associated with missing
bone volume, amount of soft tissue available to cover exposed bone and tendon, and
surgeon preference. For defects larger than 4 cm, Bishop et al[7] have advocated the use of a fibula flap, whereas a deep circumflex iliac artery–iliac
crest flap is typically used for defects smaller than 4 cm. However, it is important
to consider the location of a skin perforator flap if bone is to be transferred with
skin using such flaps. In the published data, the use of vascularized osseous flaps
has not been exempted from major complications at harvest sites. Haddock et al[1]
[5] favored the use of the medial femoral condyle for small bone defects (less than
3.5 cm). However, the medial femoral condyle bone flap does not always have a convenient
perforator supplying either the muscle or skin paddle, and thus, the use of a medial
femoral condyle osteocutaneous flap, although possible in some patients, remains problematic[15] and can leave a long scar on the medial aspect of the thigh. To the best of our
knowledge, this report is the first case series describing the management of foot
and ankle complex bone defects using an SCIA iliac osteocutaneous and fabricated iliac
osteocutaneous flap.
Compared with traditional vascularized bone flaps, the major advantages of using an
SCIA iliac osteocutaneous flap are easy accessibility from a well-concealed donor
site and the ability to perform a unicortical, bicortical, or tricortical harvest,
thereby reducing morbidity. An iliac bone segment can be raised with minimal soft
tissue inclusion because the artery nourishing the harvested iliac segment originates
from the periosteal branch of the deep branch of the SCIA. Another advantage is that
it provides a relatively small- or medium-sized vascularized iliac bone flap along
with a medium-sized thin perforator flap. This characteristic is suitable for reconstruction
of complex defects in wounds involving the dorsal foot and ankle, since the use of
a bulky flap may interfere with proper shoe fitting and prevent efficient ambulation.[14] The blood supply from the SCIA to the iliac bone is inferior to that of the deep
circumflex iliac artery, which can be a problem when a long bone defect is being reconstructed.
Taylor and Watson[8] suggested that based on the SCIA, at least 8 cm of the iliac crest can be raised.
In two cases of that series in which the bone segment length was 8 cm, fresh bleeding
was observed at the osteotomized sites before vascular pedicles were divided. Meanwhile,
the maximum size of a transferred iliac segment also depends to some extent on its
curvature. In our series, the iliac segment selected to reconstruct a bone defect
was less than 8 cm. The third advantage is that it can be fabricated as a chimeric
osteocutaneous flap with an ALT flap. Multiple reports have shown that a medium-sized
skin flap can be harvested based on the SCIA system.[16]
[17] However, weaknesses associated with this procedure, such as a limited flap width
affecting closure and a short pedicle length, limit its use for soft tissue defects
that involve more than one subunit or are too large to be covered by a single SCIA
osteocutaneous flap and in cases in which the pedicle length of the SCIA is inadequate
for anastomosis. In these circumstances, we prefer to use a microsurgically fabricated
chimeric flap. An ALT perforator flap is our preferred additional flap because its
thickness can be tailored to facilitate foot resurfacing. The descending branch of
the lateral circumflex femoral artery can provide a suitable vascular conduit for
the SCIA.[18] However, in patients with a higher body mass index (greater than 23), an ALT flap
will require secondary debulking to achieve a desirable contour. In this series, the
maximum width of a skin paddle for an SCIA osteocutaneous flap was limited to 8 cm
to permit primary closure, although Chao et al[19] reported that the donor wound of an SCIA flap with a width less than 11 cm can generally
be closed.
We acknowledge three main weaknesses in the current report. First, the number of patients
is relatively small, and the patient characteristics are heterogeneous. This limitation
should be considered when interpreting the results. Second, the position of a reconstructed
metatarsal head is usually difficult to judge in cases of extensive longitudinal arch
injury. To aid in determining the positions of the reconstructed metatarsal heads
included in this series, the planes of the heel pad and the forefoot pad beneath the
remaining metatarsal heads were measured using a large, sterilized square basin while
the ankle was held in a neutral position. The injured metatarsal head could then be
reconstructed to conform to this plane. The iliac segment was subsequently apposed
to the greatest extent possible with the shaft of the remaining metatarsals. Third,
this report did not include dynamic pedography evaluations to objectively analyze
changes in gait and loading of the foot. The AOFAS score measures the overall ability
of an individual to perform a list of activities specific to the affected foot; therefore,
the values obtained may represent foot morbidity.
Conclusion
The use of free SCIA iliac osteocutaneous and fabricated chimeric iliac osteocutaneous
flaps provides an alternative for treating small- and medium-sized bone defects (smaller
than 8 cm) along with soft tissue defects in the foot and ankle region. These flaps
offer several advantages, including easy size adjustment, an acceptable contour, and
low donor-site morbidity.