Phlebologie 1999; 28(01): 7-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617316
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Air Plethysmography: a Critical Evaluation of the Technique in Patients with CVI

L. E. G. Bossuyt
1   Dermatologic Practice, Oostende, Belgium
,
H. A. M. Neumann
1   Dermatologic Practice, Oostende, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 February 1998

accepted after revision: 08 December 1998

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Air plethysmography (APG) was compared with clinical assessment and light reflection rheography (LRR) in 68 patients with venous insufficiency (129 limbs). The aim of this study was to investigate the possibilities and limitations of this device for general phlebological practice. Out of the 68 patients, 9 were not able to perform the total investigation protocol (13%). The reflux measurement and the ejection capacity of the calf muscle pump correlated well with severe venous disease, but poorly with mild or absent signs of venous insufficiency. Abnormal refill time measured with LRR was in accordance in 82% with increased reflux with APG. A normal refill time was only correlated in 60% of the cases with a normal reflux APG test. It was not possible to distinguish between deep and superficial insufficiency. It is concluded that APG did not turn out to be the handy method for quick and accurate screening of venous insufficiency patients. Its place in the clinical evaluation for venous patients is not yet clear.

Zusammenfassung

Die Air-Plethysmographie (APG) wurde verglichen mit der klinischen Untersuchung und der Lichtreflexionsrheographie (LRR) bei 68 Patienten mit chronischer venöser Insuffizienz (CVI). Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der APG in der phlebologischen Diagnostik zu erfassen. Von den 68 Patienten konnten 9 (13%) das Studienprotokol nicht beenden. Die Korrelation von APG und LRR, wie auch von ambulantem venösen Druck (AVP) und APG-Messungen während körperlicher Anspannung war mäßig. Die Korrelation von Auswurffraktion und der Schwere der Krankheit hingegen waren gut. Es war nicht möglich aufgrund der APG zwischen tiefer und oberflächlicher venöser Insuffizienz zu unterscheiden. Schlußfolgernd kann gesagt werden, daß die APG nicht in der alltäglichen phlebologischen Diagnostik eingesetzt werden kann, da es eine zeitintensive Untersuchung ist und ihr diagnostischer Stellenwert noch besser definiert werden muß.

 
  • References

  • 1 Allen J. Volume changes in the lower limb in response to postural alterations and muscular exercise. South African J Surg 1964; 2: 75-90.
  • 2 Bundens WP. Use of the air plethysmograph in the evaluation and treatment of patients with venous stasis disease. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 67-9.
  • 3 Christopoulos D, Nicolaides AN. Noninvasive diagnosis and quantification of popliteal reflux in the swollen and ulcerated leg. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1988; 29: 535-9.
  • 4 Christopoulos D, Nicolaides AN, Szendron G. Venous reflux quantification and correlation with the clinical severity of chronic venous disease. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 352-6.
  • 5 Christopoulos D, Nicolaides AN, Cook A, Irvine A. Pathogenesis of venous ulceration in relation to the calf muscle pump function. Surgery 1989; 106: 829-35.
  • 6 Christopoulos D, Nicolaides AN, Belcaro G. Air plethysmography. Phlebology Digest 1992; 4: 4-10.
  • 7 Gerwen HJL van, Brakkee AJM, Kuiper JP. Noninvasive measurement of venous muscle pump function in the supine position. Phlebology 1992; 7: 146-9.
  • 8 Hübner K. La photoreflexometrie est-elle qualifiée comme méthode de depistage au cabinet médical?. Phlébologie 1986; 39: 691-6.
  • 9 Kuiper JP, Brakkee AJM. Unblutige Venendruckmessung. Eine Methode zur Routine-untersuchung von venösen Zirkulationsstörungen. Hautarzt 1971; 22: 153-9.
  • 10 Kuiper JP. Venous pressure determination (direct method). Dermatologica 1966; 132: 206-17.
  • 11 Neumann HAM, Boersma ID. Light reflection rheography. A noninvasive diagnostic tool for screening for venous disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 425-30.
  • 12 Norgren L, Thulesius O. Pressure volume characteristics of foot veins in normal cases and patients with venous insufficiency. Blood Vessels 1975; 12: 1-12.
  • 13 Nuzzaci G, Mangoni N, Tonarelli AP. et al. Our experience with light reflection rheography (LRR): a new noninvasive method for lower limb venous examination. Phlebology 1986; 1: 231-41.
  • 14 Partsch H. Investigations of the pathogenesis of venous leg ulcers. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 544: 25-9.
  • 15 Payne SPK, Thrush AJ, London NJM. et al. Venous assessment using air plethysmography: A comparison with clinical examination, ambulatory pressure measurement and duplex scanning. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 967-70.
  • 16 Thibault PH. Duplex examination. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 77-82.
  • 17 Weindorf N, Schultz-Ehrenburg U. Der Wert der Photoplethysmographie (Lichtreflexionsrheographie) in der Phlebologie. VASA 1986; 15: 397-406.
  • 18 Widmer LK. Perpheral venous disorders: Prevalence and sociomedical importance observations in 4529 apparently healthy persons. Basel Study II. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag; 1978
  • 19 Wienert V, Blazek V. Eine neue Methode zur unblutigen dynamischen Venendruckmessung. Hautarzt 1982; 33: 498-9.