Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(01): V-VIDOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628142 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Schattauer GmbH Comparing the Implementation of CPOE in two Dutch Hospitals Revisited Authors Author Affiliations A. J. ten Hoopen 1 Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands P. E. Zanstra 1 Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands P. F. de Vries Robbé 1 Department of Medical Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen – Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen The Netherlands Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article(opens in new window) Full Text References References 1 Aarts J, Berg M. Same systems, different outcomes – comparing the implementation of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 53-61. 2 Demeester M. Cultural aspects of information technology implementation. Int J Med Inform 1999; 56 1-3 25-41. 3 Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (Suppl. 03) 207-16. 4 Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykanen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems – a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 125-36.